AbsoluteKnight
Member
Why’s that so sexyHave a good day.
ALK vials Flurotec stoppers
TREN A 105mgView attachment 342886View attachment 342887
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why’s that so sexyHave a good day.
ALK vials Flurotec stoppers
TREN A 105mgView attachment 342886View attachment 342887
If it bends those slin pins then you know you got a problemI just scooped 6000 Flurotec stoppers, because I can't pass on a good deal.
Try to Pierce one of those Flurotec stopper and understand what I meant when I said until you try you don't understand, careful not using a too thin needle, it will bend![]()
A real anabolic masterpiece. OEP's got some stiff competition lmao!It's so light...and so....clear
Correct me if I’m wrong but shouldn’t it be negative pressure for the brew process.Think positive pressure and yes with AC
Clean rooms should be positive pressureCorrect me if I’m wrong but shouldn’t it be negative pressure..
Makes sense I had it confused with other clean rooms dealing with pathogensClean rooms should be positive pressure
You want it to have clean air going in the room.
But it does make me wonder whether my 29G and 30G needles will bend. I have both with 1/2 needles and I use the 30G when I’m pinning very low volume like Tren A daily.If it bends those slin pins then you know you got a problem![]()
I dont have any issue with SHA. Just ensure clean 90 deg angle on the way in. Those stoppers are butyl rubber hockey pucks.But it does make me wonder whether my 29G and 30G needles will bend. I have both with 1/2 needles and I use the 30G when I’m pinning very low volume like Tren A daily.
It will not, I Pierce Flurotec stopper normally with a 29G insulin syringe and it works fine.But it does make me wonder whether my 29G and 30G needles will bend. I have both with 1/2 needles and I use the 30G when I’m pinning very low volume like Tren A daily.
29G insulin syringe
They can not handle the work load to be honest. It’s much different now that China is not a big player. Their prices for material is quite outrageous their controlling the market big time. In regards to clean up the MastE was absolutely flawless new and 98% pure. They are manufacturing brand new material but can’t keep up and turning down clients. We are definitely in a transitioning periodWhat's your take on the Indian raws you have used? They need "cleanup" or you use "as is"?
Thank you.
Thanks for the info. If you ask Jano you can actually get the raw data for the HPLC results for raws purity testing. Hence he will report out in xx.xx% format rather than the yy%+ format.They can not handle the work load to be honest. It’s much different now that China is not a big player. Their prices for material is quite outrageous their controlling the market big time. In regards to clean up the MastE was absolutely flawless new and 98% pure. They are manufacturing brand new material but can’t keep up and turning down clients. We are definitely in a transitioning period
Yessir I’m open to ideas and will notate what you mentioned about JanoThanks for the info. If you ask Jano you can actually get the raw data for the HPLC results for raws testing. Hence he will report out in xx.xx% format rather than the yy%+ format.
I personally think the yy%+ format confuses people.
You have been very generous chatting and sharing. I have another idea given your experience.
He wont listen to me. Some people still think he cant measure raws purity. I think the default notation he uses doesnt help the situation.Yessir I’m open to ideas and will notate what you mentioned about Jano
I believe Jano is pretty spot on in my personal experience. For instance that MastE that came back at 98% let’s say it was 98.00% pure. I brewed a batch and the target for my milligram was 208mg/ml. A client did a blind sample and the target was 218mg/ml. I can post the hplc report but will have to ask permission from client or at least remove his info on report.He wont listen to me. Some people still think he cant measure raws purity. I think the default notation he uses doesnt help the situation.
