More reta = more fat loss?

[Jason_orange12]

Is it as simple as that or not ive seen people saying they have taken more and they can “eat what they want” and lose fat and ive seen others say after the supression goes 15mg does no more than 8mg

What is your experience? If your getting zero appetite suppresion when you up it are you just burning your money?

 

[shredded.lyfe]

So I was right, you just admitted it right here... And 10 mg, look you're not in a decent enough shape, you sound fat. I got strength and recomp at .5 - 2 mg/week.

The devil is in the dosage!!! BROSCIENCE for the win. He shoots and scores!!

I use it for insulin sensitivity and maintaining a weight class you little bitch, I can promise I can outlift you in every metric while being leaner than you.

 

[shredded.lyfe]

On cycle? What dosage?

250 c, 100 primo

 

[Trenunaki]

The devil is in the dosages. An active person would be not bright, if they took the same amount as some fat, diabetic, with a fatty liver. Look at the ppl in the study, if they fit the study, then go by that.

Using Tirz, you will lose muscle and fat, depending on if you will counter-balance the muscle loss. Reta has the glucagon aspect, that can make you recomp, indirectly/directly gain more muscle, etc...

Glucagon has 0 anti-catabolic effect. If anything it will drive more catabolism as a depleted liver glycogen (which glucagon does) is a primary driver of muscle protein breakdown when cutting, as the uses the muscle proteins to make glucose and stabilize the blood.

Theres nothing inherently catabolic about tirz and sema and their GLP1/GIP agonism. Youre Clueless.