MK-677 & Ostarine?

[Genghis K.]

Little help please. It's my first time with these. Is either compound more effective upon waking, before bed, Pre or Post-workout? Best to stack them?

The information I have researched on both could be more consistent, so personal experience feedback is appreciated.

 

[Joeblack]

I prefer before bed. Like 90 min to 2 hours before

 

[Dr JIM]

It's important to understand although the use of MK 677 was associated with a "statistically significant" rise in IGF (from 188-234 ng/ml), such a change would not be clinically significant!

Similar IGF changes are noted with essentially all GH secretagogues!

 

[antipcman]

My personal opinion on LGD and Ostarine is that the price is not worthwhile. The cost:benefit is very below average. If you can get oats or LGD extremely cheap, I.e. $30-$50 for a full cycle, it may be worth it. However I feel your money is better spent on other items.

 

[Dr JIM]

My personal opinion on LGD and Ostarine is that the price is not worthwhile. The cost:benefit is very below average. If you can get oats or LGD extremely cheap, I.e. $30-$50 for a full cycle, it may be worth it. However I feel your money is better spent on other items.

I suspect that's the case with ALL supplements, a bonafied cost benefit analysis.

Unfortunately the only variable that is know is the COST bc few if any reliable benefit studies have been conducted on these substances.

 

[antipcman]

I agree. First comes authenticity. Where is the product coming from? How has it been handled? Has the supplier cut the product to the people who are pushing it? How good is Company XYZ at measurement? Then comes the clinical trials; which I've seen little of. I have seen logs where SARMs have suppressed the libido. If that is the case, why not take a minimal dose of Anavar? That's my logic anyway.

 

[DIE KRAFT]

What about YK-11?

 

[Dr JIM]

What about YK-11?

What about it, if you have any evidence based data I'd like to review it.

 

[CAswole]

What about it, if you have any evidence based data I'd like to review it.

So Dr Jim what I'm getting from you is fuck sarms, correct?

 

[Dr JIM]

So Dr Jim what I'm getting from you is fuck sarms, correct?

Not at all bc SARMS do exhibit a certain degree of anabolic activity IN-VIVO.

The problem (as I see it anyway) like many PEDs, is their COST:BENEFIT RATIO compared to ESTABLISHED anabolic drugs such as AAS!

I see many folk on Meso discussing non-AAS drugs like they are the best thing since the invention of the protein shake, yet these same folk haven't maximized their Diet, Exercise routine OR the AAS they have on hand.

It's like they believe the difference between a successful and an unsuccessful BB/lifer is the DRUGS they are or are not using, and if they could only get THE COMBINATION RIGHT..... WRONG!

Many of these same "weekend warriors" wonder why they "aren't growing" well SURPRISE, PEDs are an AID to muscular hypertrophy or lifting successfully, the rest is WORK, dare I use that term!