MESO "Specialized" Testing Group Fund

damn well what the term fishing expedition means to people skilled in the art
This is the second time a refuted post by @AlexDavis43 has turned into a semantics discussion. At this point, I believe there is no real argument to be found here but purely someone who enjoys trolling. Which I fully respect and enjoy, but perhaps find a more suitable thread.
 
Have you nothing to say you coward @phenominal34? Sitting back there lurking and reacting to AD's shitposting. Damn dude. I see why the terms "cuck" and "cunt" became so popular on the boards.

How do we hybridize those terms into one?
 
Is this really a semantics issue with respect to the term "fishing expedition" though?

Especially when a clear hypothesis was stated from the get go.
The important question is rather - Is it worth my time replying to known contrarians? They'll argue with you no matter which side you take.
It's not their fault, really. They learned discourse at an early age from places like Reddit and 4chinz.
 
The GLP soccer moms do group testing on their peptides constantly. They do all kinds of storage and degradation testing just to find out. Some things degrade, others don’t. Was it a waste of time to find out something doesn’t degrade and you don’t need to treat it like a newborn baby? I don’t get why a group test is so taboo here. Maybe I took advantage of @readalot and everyone else?
I wanted to see the results and only had to pay a small portion of multiple GCMS tests. Maybe we all mutually benefited. @readalot did the leg work, i got the results, so i came out on top?
 
Just spoon feed me your list please. I am obviously too stupid and keep engaging with these trolls. I really wanted to believe.
Phenominal is the only one I've pointed out publicly. I'd prefer the others stay in the dark, lest they create new accounts. I'm sure you have noticed at least 2-3 more in this thread though, whether you realize it enough to actually hit the button or not.
 
Is this really a semantics issue with respect to the term "fishing expedition" though?

Especially when a clear hypothesis was stated from the get go.
It seems @AlexDavis43 is hiding behind the terminology while clearly knowing there is a negative connotation attached to it. It’s purely lawyer type shysterism as a loophole to back pedal from limp wristed claims.

I’ve hit my monthly rational thought limit, so any further responses will be in the form of dildo pics. Good day gentlemen
 
The GLP soccer moms do group testing on their peptides constantly. They do all kinds of storage and degradation testing just to find out. Some things degrade, others don’t. Was it a waste of time to find out something doesn’t degrade and you don’t need to treat it like a newborn baby? I don’t get why a group test is so taboo here. Maybe I took advantage of @readalot and everyone else?
I wanted to see the results and only had to pay a small portion of multiple GCMS tests. Maybe we all mutually benefited. @readalot did the leg work, i got the results, so i came out on top?
My apologies for duping you Bro. Nonsense.
 







There was a clear hypothesis posed from the start and you know very well what the term fishing expedition means to people skilled in the art. Who is trying to dupe people here?

You have a PhD in a scientific field but don't know what the term "fishing expedition" means?

Make this make sense. I'll wait.

Yes, fishing expedition

A non-targeted approach; in this case, looking to see if GCMS detects a mystery compound at low levels in the light tren, medium in the intermediate tren, and high in the dark tren (or low in the first two and high only in the dark one, etc)

Then see if it makes sense; for example if the mystery compound could explain the color, or if it was toxic, or maybe it has no clear connection

That wasn't too hard, was it?
 
For all your fans to see ….

Poor sad pathetic little man

I’m just here trying to watch some NFL football like a normal human.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4237.webp
    IMG_4237.webp
    139.5 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG_4238.webp
    IMG_4238.webp
    120.8 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG_2498.gif
    IMG_2498.gif
    630 KB · Views: 34
One more time...


"Well in full disclosure we could not find any smoking gun in the light vs darker tren for the experiments we did. So starting with a very high purity raw disproved the hypothesis there was a TRA degradation product imparting the color. It is was just HPLC there may have been some lingering doubt, but GCMS was clean as well."

Null hypothesis was rejected. Only fuckery explains your actions @AlexDavis43. Or come and plead ignorance?


giphy.com-media-oOTTyHRHj0HYY-giphy.gifgiphy.com-media-Q09lToTa0H3Es-giphy.gifgiphy.com-media-2XdOCuEVqXQLeN38DB-giphy-downsized.gifgiphy.com-media-3oz8xJIDVJ1KANEUfK-giphy.gif
 
horror blood GIF by Shudder
 
Last edited:
Back
Top