sionnach
Banned
I thought everyone had that poor guy on Ignore by now.So it’s just a guy you have a beef with trying to wind you up.
Don’t even stress about it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought everyone had that poor guy on Ignore by now.So it’s just a guy you have a beef with trying to wind you up.
Don’t even stress about it.
The right thing to do IMO is bring the info to the thread so donors are aware. I am trying to provide full transparency so further projects aren't derailed by this BS. We have a chance to build real momentum here.I thought everyone had that poor guy on Ignore by now.
Hey, never any doubt from me - > towards you @readalot or @Sampei as 'fund control assistent' or something..These are serious claims by @phenominal34. My commitment stands to refund anyone who thinks they were duped or manipulated.
Thanks.
cc'ing @Sampei since he was trustee and all the BTC is accounted for.
I don't want any doubt over the way this project was handled.
Thanks for taking the time to share that. You too.Hey, never any doubt from me - > towards you @readalot or @Sampei as 'fund control assistent' or something..
So take a deep breath - And just exhale All the sh!T... And don't waste your energy on it...
I am just Happy to be a part of this little adventure.... Don't care what the outcome turns out to be, in the end - if that helps a bit...
Nice day to you'all
Well in full disclosure we could not find any smoking gun in the light vs darker tren for the experiments we did. So starting with a very high purity raw disproved the hypothesis there was a TRA degradation product imparting the color. It is was just HPLC there may have been some lingering doubt, but GCMS was clean as well within detection limits.
The right thing to do IMO is bring the info to the thread so donors are aware. I am trying to provide full transparency so further projects aren't derailed by this BS. We have a chance to build real momentum here.
Seems extremely unethical for someone to try and sabotage all this work throwing baseless accusations. Nevertheless, the info was shared for the donors.
So indirectly then?To my knowledge, no one accused you of skimming from the donations to line your pockets directly. Kudos.
Who gets the data once it is made available?The "for your personal gain" comment would be like if I wanted to use a compound but had questions about it's safety, wanted more comprehensive testing, but didn't want to pay for the tests myself
In your opinion it was an elaborate story?Then craft some elaborate story (for example, "toxic metabolites in tren related to the color") and convince Meso members that this project is about Harm Reduction, and they will be viewed as "thoughtful and open-minded" and not knuckle draggers for donating to this noble cause
You asked who was going to pay for it. I offered my answer.When I suggested this round of testing was a fishing expedition and not a giant leap for Harm Reduction, instead of agreeing, you got pissed
Tbh, convincing people to fund your project to give you peace of mind to run tren is far from the worst thing someone could do; just explaining how the "for your personal gain" comment doesn't mean you were stealing people's money
What would you call this shit? What is it? Where does it come from?Guys come on, not this shit again. Just leave each other alone. FFS
I mean it's not worth your time to keep wasting it on responding to these low jabs and accusations.What would you call this shit? What is it? Where does it come from?
And folks wonder why it is so difficult to have organized group testing here.
Send each other salty memes and gifs like real menIf you guys have a personal beef
We will also refund any money plus 10% as well. @readalot actually give a shit. What he is doing for this community should not go unnoticed.So indirectly then?
Who gets the data once it is made available?
In your opinion it was an elaborate story?
You asked who was going to pay for it. I offered my answer.
It is a shared project where the data goes to everyone. Including those who paid nothing.
My records indicate I spent $250 myself and my time trying to kick off a group testing fund after discussion with Spaceman Spiff. The testing got done.
If you are unsatisfied or feel deceived, how much money can I return to you? I will refund your donation plus 10%
Send each other salty memes and gifs like real men
I certainly don't think anyone got duped; I would've stated very clearly why I thought so if I had
I said this was a fishing expedition because that's exactly what it was... some people took that as a negative thing (?) but it has a specific meaning and happens all the time
Fishing expedition describes a situation in which the researcher has no particular aims for the research at hand. Generally, the term may refer (often in a negative way) to situations where researchers do not form hypotheses based on prior research but simply search for results to discuss as if on a “fishing expedition.” More specifically, it may also describes situations in which statistical data are crunched without any particular guiding hypotheses in the hope of finding statistically significant relationships because, if one uses the .05 level of significance, there isa1in20 chance that a significant result will be found.
A fishing expedition is an informal, pejorative term for a non-specific search for information, especially incriminating information. It is most frequently organized by policing authorities.
I challenge you to make your ignore list as big as mine.
Fishing expedition - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
There was a clear hypothesis posed from the start and you know very well what the term fishing expedition means to people skilled in the art. Who is trying to dupe people here?
You have a PhD in a scientific field but don't know what the term "fishing expedition" means?
Make this make sense. I'll wait.
Well in full disclosure we could not find any smoking gun in the light vs darker tren for the experiments we did. So starting with a very high purity raw disproved the hypothesis there was a TRA degradation product imparting the color. It is was just HPLC there may have been some lingering doubt, but GCMS was clean as well within detection limits.
Literally wasting my time. Unreal. Really.I challenge you to make your ignore list as big as mine.
Ok Cowboy, Challenge accepted => Let me see your *ignore list*I challenge you to make your ignore list as big as mine.
