Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services

Venom Test C, retested god knows how many times, because we were getting results between 280 and 295 mg/ml with over 2% RSD, so we wanted to have a proper statistical sample for the result. Also, this amount of tests means we ran into negative profit on this test, but what could we do.


1770558458001.webp
 
Defiant Nandrolone Decanoate: I gave it a thorough review - possible analyst bad judgement. Signal too strong, might affect linearity of results - ordered diluted testing. Not sure if it will yield different result, but I will check.

View attachment 378109

Despite detector having claimed linearity to 2500, I'd rather stay on the safe side here just to be sure.
Thank you for doing this without me even asking. Had no idea but I greatly appreciate it.

Please let me know the results when you get them back.

D.
 
Defiant Nandrolone Decanoate: I gave it a thorough review - possible analyst bad judgement. Signal too strong, might affect linearity of results - ordered diluted testing. Not sure if it will yield different result, but I will check.

View attachment 378109

Despite detector having claimed linearity to 2500, I'd rather stay on the safe side here just to be sure.

I used his calculator on all of my samples that just went to Jano.

So if the tests come back unsatisfactory I'll just blame @dinfar1337 ;)
Thank you for doing this without me even asking. Had no idea but I greatly appreciate it.

Please let me know the results when you get them back.

D.
1770631721506.webp

No significant difference FYI.
 
its janoshik stealing your trenbolone not me!!!!
you put some danish wizard magic in your calculator which magically siphons off a tiny bit of the raws used for brewing.
Don't think we are not catching on, we all know how much you want to get your hands on Tren Hex, even if its just a few grams...
People are waking up to your magical trickery.
Count your days, wizard of the tall lands.
 
TNE Arail:
View attachment 378105

As per Arail: "We believe the TNE was crashed from the looks of the sample picture"

I can't deem so, the sample is oil in *amber* vial. I have ordered heat, shake and retest.
Significantly reheated and shaken sample arrived a bit higher, amber vial didn't help with noticing crashing, so it probably deserved more heat than we used before. We can't just randomly overheat oils, in case they contain something thermally labile and there's a fine line here we have to balance...

RSD 6%, but given it's still more than 10% under target dose it won't mean reissued report. What do you think?
 
Significantly reheated and shaken sample arrived a bit higher, amber vial didn't help with noticing crashing, so it probably deserved more heat than we used before. We can't just randomly overheat oils, in case they contain something thermally labile and there's a fine line here we have to balance...
its just a guess

but all of these injectables are arriving crashed, maybe you're accidetally purifying the samples with impurities which co-eluded before. its the only guess being left in my brain.

but its hard to figure out, you would have to get a standard for the impurities and compare before and then crashing it, waiting for 30 days shipping time and reheat.
 
its just a guess

but all of these injectables are arriving crashed, maybe you're accidetally purifying the samples with impurities which co-eluded before. its the only guess being left in my brain.

but its hard to figure out, you would have to get a standard for the impurities and compare before and then crashing it, waiting for 30 days shipping time and reheat.
I apologize, I have no idea what exactly do you mean.

Welp, not the result I was hoping for. Thanks again for rechecking it though.

Still don't know where I could have gone wrong on my measurements. I came out with the correct amount of vials I should have on the batch so this is a head scratcher for sure.
Well, if it was that, it would take simple change in the process for us to fix that, but nope. Leaves only the stipulation I had in your thread earlier a couple days ago. No better ideas so far.
 
Announcement:

We detected unauthorized access on Feb 2, took affected services offline to contain it, patched the entry point, and restored service early Feb 3. Later we found out the attacker copied database data and later attempted extortion.

What did not happen: we have no evidence of customer funds being stolen and no evidence that email inboxes were accessed (no evidence emails were stolen/read).

The main practical risk is phishing/impersonation using stolen order/report/shipping details. Please don’t engage with extortion messages.

We’ll post updates on leak.janoshik.com. If you receive anything suspicious referencing Janoshik, forward it to dedicated email security@janoshik.com
 
Back
Top