MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services
- Thread starter janoshik
- Start date
We are getting a bit overwhelmed so I might be missing social media / forum questions.
Guaiacol is only qualitative.
EO is only semi-quantiative via GCMS screening.
BA is actually *too* volatile to encompass in a screening which is supposed to show also high boiling point compounds, unfortunately.
Quote number #25043 :
-------------------------
1x BA/BB testing x 30 USD = 30 USD
1x Guaiacol in AAS oil x 15 USD = 15 USD
1x GCMS screening x 170 USD = 170 USD
-------------------------
TOTAL: 215 USD
This offer remains valid until May 31, 2025.
Guaiacol is only qualitative.
EO is only semi-quantiative via GCMS screening.
BA is actually *too* volatile to encompass in a screening which is supposed to show also high boiling point compounds, unfortunately.
Quote number #25043 :
-------------------------
1x BA/BB testing x 30 USD = 30 USD
1x Guaiacol in AAS oil x 15 USD = 15 USD
1x GCMS screening x 170 USD = 170 USD
-------------------------
TOTAL: 215 USD
This offer remains valid until May 31, 2025.
If you feel like we are not answering emails, please, always check your spam folder, try a different email and change your email password and ensure you really are writing to JANOSHIK.COM email.
Thank you all.
Thank you all.
RustyVault
New Member
Just had Jano test some tc and te for me. Process was simple and laid out clearly. Their team responded to my emails quickly, they received my samples yesterday and I had results when I woke up this morning.
Thank you very much @janoshik and his team.
Thank you very much @janoshik and his team.
Ateam2023
Member
will you be posting the Jano test results to the Meso community? Or did i miss them? Tia
RustyVault
New Member
Absolutely sharing with the community.
TC250 from Devon: MESO-Rx Sponsor - DEVON ONE STOP SHOP - US DOMESTIC
TE300 from JY: JY pharma | community testing
Photon
Member
Theres Jano reports for SLU floating on this forum.
AlexDavis43
Member
Yes, someone posted their results.
Photon
Member
Hi @janoshik
Would like some feedback on raw purity testing.
The usual approach is to send a raw sample of min .2g for testing, and obtain a raw purity %.
I have an alternative suggested approach.
(1) Take 5 grams of raws, by sampling many different parts of raws.
(2) Fill to 10ml using 100% guaiacol, which ensures everything is dissolved.
(3) Send all 10ml for testing.
We have 10ml consisting of 5 grams of raws fully dissolved.
We have mg/ml per HPLC.
We have displacement.
We can work out purity % easily.
(1) Would this approach work?
(2) Would it be more accurate?
(3) What would you suggest is a good sample size %? 5 gr of raws out of 1kg is only 0.5%.
(4) For the margin error of 5%, do you have any suggestions on how we can narrow it down?
Would like some feedback on raw purity testing.
The usual approach is to send a raw sample of min .2g for testing, and obtain a raw purity %.
I have an alternative suggested approach.
(1) Take 5 grams of raws, by sampling many different parts of raws.
(2) Fill to 10ml using 100% guaiacol, which ensures everything is dissolved.
(3) Send all 10ml for testing.
We have 10ml consisting of 5 grams of raws fully dissolved.
We have mg/ml per HPLC.
We have displacement.
We can work out purity % easily.
(1) Would this approach work?
(2) Would it be more accurate?
(3) What would you suggest is a good sample size %? 5 gr of raws out of 1kg is only 0.5%.
(4) For the margin error of 5%, do you have any suggestions on how we can narrow it down?
If you trust your scales and volume measurement, why not.
I'd expect roughly double margin of error with this approach under usual circumstances.
I'd expect roughly double margin of error with this approach under usual circumstances.
Good point. High quality scale and mass everything. At least it somewhat addresses sample heterogeneity if that's a thing.
Email us, team will guide you through it. We are pretty flexible, but we have recommended way of doing things.
Insanely much.
Detecting, IDing and quantifying *complete* unknowns is insanely expensive and difficult.
Eg. mannitol is OK, but requires us to use a completely different dilution and method, so even something as stupid adds steps into the process and additional tests, so the quantity of it gets expensive.
Now a random component of machine cleaning liquid in trace amount? Just imagine that.
Detecting, IDing and quantifying *complete* unknowns is insanely expensive and difficult.
Eg. mannitol is OK, but requires us to use a completely different dilution and method, so even something as stupid adds steps into the process and additional tests, so the quantity of it gets expensive.
Now a random component of machine cleaning liquid in trace amount? Just imagine that.
Photon
Member
Anyone got a outbound pack to Jano get lost before?
Ive got about 10 samples with no tracking updates for a week, Its pretty much lost by now and UPS has told me to file a claim. (Like what am i going to claim? lol 10 vials? of mysterious substance worth..$1?)
I'm hoping PirateShip will just refund but I havn't gone that route yet.
For incoming packs, you'd usually wait for a while and they'd turn up..but is this still the case when sending out? Its stuck somewhere in US..
Ive got about 10 samples with no tracking updates for a week, Its pretty much lost by now and UPS has told me to file a claim. (Like what am i going to claim? lol 10 vials? of mysterious substance worth..$1?)
I'm hoping PirateShip will just refund but I havn't gone that route yet.
For incoming packs, you'd usually wait for a while and they'd turn up..but is this still the case when sending out? Its stuck somewhere in US..
I would wait it out. Could turn up. Has happened before with UPS.
did you attach a commercial invoice to the package?
Photon
Member
Never had to for all my past shipments.
In fact, the forms that u attached for customs purposes, are actually digital transmitted for majority of the countries, implemented years ago. It's no longer required for majority of the countries, but it's just something people still do because it was done in the past.
Similar threads
