Jano the results I'm getting are not the one that I should. Can you have a look at it, it will probably reduce the work you gotta have to go back and forth fixing the reports afterwards.It's okay to send it in like that, but we love when people ask
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jano the results I'm getting are not the one that I should. Can you have a look at it, it will probably reduce the work you gotta have to go back and forth fixing the reports afterwards.It's okay to send it in like that, but we love when people ask
As far as I am aware, the only issue is that some of your reports were missing raw data and us not authorizing some additional custom requests, am I mistaken?Jano the results I'm getting are not the one that I should. Can you have a look at it, it will probably reduce the work you gotta have to go back and forth fixing the reports afterwards.
Yeah I was referring to the raw data not being attached, I'm a bit unhappy about the "custom request" because I had requested the specific purity of the RAWS since the first time I ordered the tests and I wasn't challenged on it so I assumed it was going to be provided as I requested and now when the results are coming in I'm being told I won't get it that way.As far as I am aware, the only issue is that some of your reports were missing raw data and us not authorizing some additional custom requests, am I mistaken?
Thank you.
I have few quite important questions to be answered on the raw data just received on the purity tests of raw, I would prefer for now to do it in private, so please check your private messages here.Understandable.
I've scolded the mailbox team both for not refusing that outright request and for not clearing the raw data with me first.
Please, mind it is not necessary to mirror the questions in DMs, email and urge about them in the thread as well. Thank you.I have few quite important questions to be answered on the raw data just received on the purity tests of raw, I would prefer for now to do it in private, so please check your private messages here.
Please, mind it is not necessary to mirror the questions in DMs, email and urge about them in the thread as well. Thank you.
You gotta expand Jano, create an empire. You are young you can definitely do it.We always sign ourselves in the email and only I sign as "Janoshik."
Before any email gets to me, my team tries to handle it first.
Our email shows 30000 conversations ( I could estimate average to be 5 emails per conversation ) in past 365 days.
If there was no filter between me and people, I couldn't handle it.
I'm on verge of handling the demand as it is and we're refusing a lot of business due to that already. Unfortunately.
We can tell whether something is there or not usually. Other stuff we cannot afford to take on right now.@janoshik are you able to identify & quantify excipients in HGH? I would be curious to see the testing between Serostim vs popular chinese UGL hgh since the "anabolic bodybuilding" crew and "experts" over there discuss UGL containing "polymers" probably just mannitol...
1) I strongly don't believe it is so."its all the additives added to UGL hgh that change the daltons, molecular weight of the hgh, that effect absorption" - Big Paul
"when you then add Biloxone, polymers and all these other fillers it doesnt seem to absorb at the same rate, and youve changed the molecular weight of the whole thing" -Kurt Havens
No problem, that's actually a good question that deserves to be reiterated here and there.Sorry if this has already been answered. I had a look and I couldn’t find the answer.
As different compounds cost different amounts to test, how does blind testing work?
Thanks for the spoon feeding. It’s very tasty. Does that mean no blind testing for aromatase inhibitors or pde5is?No problem, that's actually a good question that deserves to be reiterated here and there.
Blind testing is offered only for particular groups of samples, eg. blind test for common anabolic steroids only or blind test only for peptides that we routinely test etc.
Blind testing, as in you send something completely unknown doesn't exist and no laboratory in the world will accept something like that.
Cheers
Common AI's (letrozole, anastrozole and exemestane) are actually included in the AAS test.Thanks for the spoon feeding. It’s very tasty. Does that mean no blind testing for aromatase inhibitors or pde5is?
Thanks, man. I’ll be making an order when my raws get here.Common AI's (letrozole, anastrozole and exemestane) are actually included in the AAS test.
1x Blind common anabolic steroid and aromatase inhibitors screening - orals (pills, tablets, capsules) x 120 USD = 120 USD
1x Blind common anabolic steroid and aromatase inhibitors screening - raws x 120 USD = 120 USD
PDE5s are too complicated - there's a different test for tadalafil, different one for sildenafil and different one for vardenafil. Not even talking about anavafil, amino tadalafil etc etc.
There's very litlle demand for blind testing those so any demand for such will get a personalized offer, but expect it to be much more expensive, solely due to amount of additional work necessary.
Thank you!I have used their service, it is quite good.
It would be even better if they have a local branch in the United States.
