Janoshik Accuracy Worries Address

Either way, if the powder is not a mixed compound like sustanon and if it was uniformly mixed as a powder, then whether it melts or not shouldn't matter when sent for testing? Are we not melting raws and making a homogenous solution?
you're right.

i think brother the squat had a raw powder which tested well below 60-70%

60-70% of the steroid is uniform, rest is not.

make sense to stir it if its cut with shit. probably a very extreme case, usually not needed with trusted manufacturers.

if we get used to below 80% shit its a different story

you can usually confirm its uniform by seeing all white/yellow crystals look similar sized.
 
Oh yeah I do believe they dilute EQ because unlike other raws it's easy to disguise it.
I'm still trying to get through the lies of Tracy and the sticky EQ lol, what bullshit that was.

You want sticky or regular, I'll pass but thank you, lol!
 
I'm still trying to get through the lies of Tracy and the sticky EQ lol, what bullshit that was.

You want sticky or regular, I'll pass but thank you, lol!
I admit I did believe her at that time lol
I should have been more critical but I wasn't into raw at that time so my ignorance got the best of me
 
you're right.

i think brother the squat had a raw powder which tested well below 60-70%

60-70% of the steroid is uniform, rest is not.

make sense to stir it if its cut with shit. probably a very extreme case, usually not needed with trusted manufacturers.

if we get used to below 80% shit its a different story

you can usually confirm its uniform by seeing all white/yellow crystals look similar sized.
I don't want below 94% but won't piss and moan if 90% comes my way these days either.

But I would expect improvement on future batches if 90%
 
I admit I did believe her at that time lol
I should have been more critical but I wasn't into raw at that time so my ignorance got the best of me
Lol, sticky EQ.

I think after they got busted and came back in the manner they did is what opened more eye on Tracy.

Was easy for many to just take the bullshit at them prices at the time, $370 a kg of test c, $1100 100g Primo E.

It was ridiculously low and only Mike could compete with that.
 
I'm still trying to get through the lies of Tracy and the sticky EQ lol, what bullshit that was.

You want sticky or regular, I'll pass but thank you, lol!

i dont know, but if anyone knows where i can buy 98% sticky please let me know. Axel had suposedly sticky EQ raws that crashes at 200mg/ml.

I wanna buy some to take a look. It might be a collectors item in 30 years.
 
I never had melted raw for now, so I'm. Not well versed on how to handle them or if you need to stir etc.

Something im gonna start doing is, I'm gonna shake the shit of mg raw bag and pick a sample deep down in the middle and. Not just on the top.
I always dig deeper and move it around!
 
I think there maybe confusion with the testing maybe. Say I send in a sample for related substances/purity testing on raw BU and it comes back at 82%. Test reveals the main impurity is mainly unbound boldenone, some partially hydrolyzed ester and then some other small minor impurities.

Now I also send in a sample of brew that I did with these same raws, but did the brew based on 96% because I'm a moron that couldn't wait for results. Or I maybe just brewed a quick sample and included the oil depot sample with raw sample. And to my surprise it hit the target mg/ml on the assay. How could this be if only 82% pure BU and I figured 96%? Are we getting assay method or related substances/purity method on the oil? Assay would show the boldenone, bound or not. So your mg/ml would look like you hit target. This doesn't change the fact that it is still only 82% BU. Just shows there is at least 96% boldenone related content there that matchs your brew.

Is this correct @janoshik
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top