Jano filtering cloudy HGH before testing?

[Elektrobot]

Saw this on a Jano test sheet

"Samples were filtered prior to analysis due to cloudiness".

I've only been in the HGH game for about 6 months, but this was the first time I've seen that on a Jano test.

Is this common?

I know it's not his responsibility give a use or don't use ruling.

Does seeing the test numbers after filtering cloudy hgh change any thoughts on using cloudy HGH?

I'm not suggesting that it should. Just a curiosity.

 

[adversi]

The 60iu green tops from a US source on here had they same thing on there jano report. They were discontinued because of users reporting cloudiness.

 

[Photon]

Saw this on a Jano test sheet

"Samples were filtered prior to analysis due to cloudiness".

I've only been in the HGH game for about 6 months, but this was the first time I've seen that on a Jano test.

Is this common?

I know it's not his responsibility give a use or don't use ruling.

Does seeing the test numbers after filtering cloudy hgh change any thoughts on using cloudy HGH?

I'm not suggesting that it should. Just a curiosity.

AAS compounds are filtered to prevent damage to the machine.
Now as to why for peptides, im not entirely sure but im going to assuming it might be the same reason.

Post in thread 'Are we all wasting our HGH?'

Jan 27, 2023

Maybe @janoshik can reply on his thoughts. Would be interesting to hear/read how he’s reconstituting to run his analysis.

Not because I think there is any truth to this but because it would be interesting to read his thoughts and methods of testing.

Mix, look if cloudy, shake gently, repeat.

If still cloudy sonicate gently in ultrasonic bath. If it doesn't work, filter to avoid particulates.

Total time: <2 minutes

• janoshik

• 

Post in thread 'Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services'

Nov 4, 2020

@janoshik does the oil have to be filtered prior to sending off?

No Sir, I filter the samples before they are analyzed so that the accidental impurities don't foul my system anyway, so it's not a problem.

• janoshik

 

[bate]

In this interview Per mentioned they use "ultra pure water"

View: https://youtu.be/shgk3-u51Ys?si=ysymQ_T_yiEPrSQM&t=2700

 

[Ghoul]

All samples must be filtered prior to being analyzed. Then the columns themselves change the nature of the sample, for instance, by “disentangling” some of the small aggregates that make it past the filtration stage.

Every method of analysis has certain limitations, which is why no single method ever gives a complete picture.

Cloudy peptides / rHGH, have always been around, yet until recently you never saw a mention of them on reports:

It’s not that HPLC is bad, but it has limitations.

Only being able to analyze samples that have been filtered is one of them.

Common sense should tell you that if you’re not filtering too, what you’re injecting is likely very different from the “99% purity” on the report people equate with “safety”.

A lot of people can’t seem to grasp this.

Peptide / rHGH Jano report = after being purified through a .22um (pores smaller than bacteria) filter.

Unfiltered peptide / rHGH you’re injecting = what’s in the report + whatever shit was caught in the filter. Bacteria, aggregates, metal, glass, plastic particles.

It’s like sending a sample of your drinking water to a lab to be analyzed.

They ultra-filter it before testing, and based on that report you feel safe drinking straight from the tap.

 

[Photon]

All samples must be filtered prior to being analyzed.

For all?
I know its done for AAS but for peps it does seem to imply filtering only if it's cloudy. I don't mind asking in his thread but i'm not sure if he's addressed it before

Post in thread 'Are we all wasting our HGH?'

Jan 27, 2023

Maybe @janoshik can reply on his thoughts. Would be interesting to hear/read how he’s reconstituting to run his analysis.

Not because I think there is any truth to this but because it would be interesting to read his thoughts and methods of testing.

Mix, look if cloudy, shake gently, repeat.

If still cloudy sonicate gently in ultrasonic bath. If it doesn't work, filter to avoid particulates.

Total time: <2 minutes

• janoshik

• 

 

[Ghoul]

For all?
I know its done for AAS but for peps it does seem to imply filtering only if it's cloudy. I don't mind asking in his thread but i'm not sure if he's addressed it before

Post in thread 'Are we all wasting our HGH?'

Jan 27, 2023

Maybe @janoshik can reply on his thoughts. Would be interesting to hear/read how he’s reconstituting to run his analysis.

Not because I think there is any truth to this but because it would be interesting to read his thoughts and methods of testing.

Mix, look if cloudy, shake gently, repeat.

If still cloudy sonicate gently in ultrasonic bath. If it doesn't work, filter to avoid particulates.

Total time: <2 minutes

• janoshik

• 

This has been asked before. All samples must be “clarified” or there’s a risk of serious damage to the equipment. This is standard practice in every lab analyzing peptide / protein samples with HPLC.

It seems to make some people’s heads explode because of how they assumed “purity” is determined.

And after you get passed blowing up that paradigm, you can get into an entire discussion of how “purity” in the context of this type of analysis is not what they think that means, either. How 2 peptides / rHGH samples with exactly the same purity could produce very different results because of the nuanced differences that can be “hidden under the curve”.

 

[deadbeef]

For all?
I know its done for AAS but for peps it does seem to imply filtering only if it's cloudy. I don't mind asking in his thread but i'm not sure if he's addressed it before

He uses a 0.22um PTFE filter for peps.