High Test Versus Low Test Cycles

[Nick_Vaz]

Wanted to get a gauge on peoples experiences running cycles with high test / low additional anabolics and visa versa. In particular experiences with Npp, Primo/EQ, and mast. Wondering whether its worth running test just over TRT levels and adding in these compounds or just sprinkling them on top of a generous test base. I know everyone is different and cycles should be built upon bloodwork but I am curious the experiences others have had.

In addition to this I know oral are generally frowned upon but I often either hear of their use as "kickstarters" or "finishers" have any of yall had any experiences with either or and why do you feel your way works best.

 

[rebornmuscles]

Hi bro,
Like you say it's individual, like if someone take 500mg test and his estrogen hit the roof, high dht, prostate growth... well this guy need less test but higher of other compounds, another guy take 2g test and low dosahe of other compounds without any problem at all, it's very individual you have to make bloodcheck and see what works for you

 

[Psychokoak]

I tried mostly
-1.6gr of testosterone alone with a bit of exemestan
- 500 test 500 primo 600 mast
- 300 test 400 npp
And other and other lol

Currently I am doing 900mg of test and 1000mg of primo. Leave the possibility of seeing what primo really gives in high doses.

In fact I like a high testo because I tolerate it well. No sides from test.

But alone I lose what's interest in other steroids. The DHT derivated gives an interesting cosmetic gain honestly.
Npp gives an interesting muscle size too.

There is no perfect solution or ratio, as said above, choose a testosterone level that is manageable for you and fill the gap if necessary with others.
And if you tolerate 2gr of testosterone then you could do with just that to build muscle.