MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

Hgh vs more AAS

Prince Charming

Prince Charming

New Member
Sup dudes, I’m planning my 3rd blast which will be in a couple months and trying to decide if permanently adding HGH or just increasing the amount of AAS will be a better bang for my buck. I’m planning to run 750 test e, 500 eq, 250 mast p ( too hard to get ahold of primo so would like to try a combo of eq/mast as I have a good stash of both). 1st cycle was 500 test with some anavar last 6 weeks. 2nd cycle was 500 test, 300 primo. This will be my biggest cycle so far but am wondering if it would be better to just run 500 test, 250 eq, 250 mast, and 4-6iu hgh (starting at 2 and slowly working up to 4-6 by start of the cycle, then staying there as long as sides can be maintained).

What draws me to HGH is the quality of life improvements it offers but don’t know if I’m gonna see much out of 4iu. 4 would be preferred obviously due to price but I can budget up to 6iu a day. Another thing is that I’m only 27, probably too young to be considering HGH, and would like some opinions on that.

TLDR: Give me your opinions on
1) 750 test, 500 eq, 250 mast vs 500 test, 250 eq, 250 mast, 4-6iu HGH.
2) appropriate age to start considering HGH.

Thanks guys
 
Prince Charming said:
Sup dudes, I’m planning my 3rd blast which will be in a couple months and trying to decide if permanently adding HGH or just increasing the amount of AAS will be a better bang for my buck. I’m planning to run 750 test e, 500 eq, 250 mast p ( too hard to get ahold of primo so would like to try a combo of eq/mast as I have a good stash of both). 1st cycle was 500 test with some anavar last 6 weeks. 2nd cycle was 500 test, 300 primo. This will be my biggest cycle so far but am wondering if it would be better to just run 500 test, 250 eq, 250 mast, and 4-6iu hgh (starting at 2 and slowly working up to 4-6 by start of the cycle, then staying there as long as sides can be maintained).

What draws me to HGH is the quality of life improvements it offers but don’t know if I’m gonna see much out of 4iu. 4 would be preferred obviously due to price but I can budget up to 6iu a day. Another thing is that I’m only 27, probably too young to be considering HGH, and would like some opinions on that.

TLDR: Give me your opinions on
1) 750 test, 500 eq, 250 mast vs 500 test, 250 eq, 250 mast, 4-6iu HGH.
2) appropriate age to start considering HGH.

Thanks guys
Click to expand...

2) if you're taking GH for anti-aging, can start now or wait till whenever...

30? sure

40? sure

50? definitely

If you're taking it for bodybuilding, whenever you're bodybuilding, which seems like now

Either way, get your GH and IGF1 measured at baseline
 
Yep I’m due for bloods within a couple weeks I’ll make sure to add them in. Thank ya sir. Also good to hear, I’ll probably end up incorporating it into my daily routine and try to use a little less gear.
 
I would go with the one with GH and gradually increase the EQ to 400-600 as long as it doesnt crash your estrogen. Im not sure what your idea is with the masteron, but at that low of a dose, i might as well just run more test and EQ together with the GH and call it a blast.
 
eery said:
I would go with the one with GH and gradually increase the EQ to 400-600 as long as it doesnt crash your estrogen. Im not sure what your idea is with the masteron, but at that low of a dose, i might as well just run more test and EQ together with the GH and call it a blast.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the input. I’ve made up my mind to start HGH. My goal with the masteron is more so the feelz, I figure a combo of eq/mast will give a more pronounced effect similar to primo. Harder muscles, general state of happiness, vascularity, and e2 management via the eq. Not really expecting it to be adding a lot of mass, just want the icing on 500 test. I know that’s not a lot either but I’ve had satisfying results from it in my mind.
 
HGH 4-6 is a great stable for any cycle. For gains and other benefits like recovery, sleep, possible hyperplasia.

Seeing as how EQ will be a new introduction for you this cycle, I would suggest titrating up on this. EQ is extremely erythropoietic, unlike primo, and will drive up your hematocrit, especially alongside 500 test, which already does so mildly. Watch the sides (anxiety, heart rate, BP) and ramp it up slowly while keeping test constant would be my suggestion. You would be able to see how your e2 is as well while it ramps.
 
tehducky599 said:
HGH 4-6 is a great stable for any cycle. For gains and other benefits like recovery, sleep, possible hyperplasia.

Seeing as how EQ will be a new introduction for you this cycle, I would suggest titrating up on this. EQ is extremely erythropoietic, unlike primo, and will drive up your hematocrit, especially alongside 500 test, which already does so mildly. Watch the sides (anxiety, heart rate, BP) and ramp it up slowly while keeping test constant would be my suggestion. You would be able to see how your e2 is as well while it ramps.
Click to expand...
thanks and that’s a good idea regarding eq. I’m starting at the end of this month and am gonna start with a 2:1 ratio test:eq. Gonna take bloods 8 weeks in then I’m gonna adjust depending on how labs look.
 
IndividualMan said:
4-6IU GH, easy way to get a better look short term and great progress in the long term.
just make sure to start at 1-2 IU/day and titrate up by 1 IU every week and a half-2weeks or so.
and have taurine at hand.
Click to expand...
That’s the way I ended up doing it. Started at 2iu and worked up to 4 starting this week. Only issue was sleep but I’m trying it out morning today to see how it goes tonight.
 
Prince Charming said:
Sup dudes, I’m planning my 3rd blast which will be in a couple months and trying to decide if permanently adding HGH or just increasing the amount of AAS will be a better bang for my buck. I’m planning to run 750 test e, 500 eq, 250 mast p ( too hard to get ahold of primo so would like to try a combo of eq/mast as I have a good stash of both). 1st cycle was 500 test with some anavar last 6 weeks. 2nd cycle was 500 test, 300 primo. This will be my biggest cycle so far but am wondering if it would be better to just run 500 test, 250 eq, 250 mast, and 4-6iu hgh (starting at 2 and slowly working up to 4-6 by start of the cycle, then staying there as long as sides can be maintained).

What draws me to HGH is the quality of life improvements it offers but don’t know if I’m gonna see much out of 4iu. 4 would be preferred obviously due to price but I can budget up to 6iu a day. Another thing is that I’m only 27, probably too young to be considering HGH, and would like some opinions on that.

TLDR: Give me your opinions on
1) 750 test, 500 eq, 250 mast vs 500 test, 250 eq, 250 mast, 4-6iu HGH.
2) appropriate age to start considering HGH.

Thanks guys
Click to expand...
I am running a similar cycle now
750 test
600 eq
300 mast
4iu gh
my E2 came back at 8, I just started week 3 of dropping the EQ and my elbows don’t feel like they are going to blow out. So keep an eye on your E2.
 
1Megaman said:
I am running a similar cycle now
750 test
600 eq
300 mast
4iu gh
my E2 came back at 8, I just started week 3 of dropping the EQ and my elbows don’t feel like they are going to blow out. So keep an eye on your E2.
Click to expand...
What's the mast for are you bulking or cutting ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Test, Deca, EQ, Mast, Primo HGH Cycle
2
Replies
26
Views
499
xrayphoton13
xrayphoton13
C
  • Question Question
Hgh dosage plan
Replies
13
Views
580
KOArtist
KOArtist
S
Masteron Shortage
2
Replies
28
Views
1K
trtbuilder
trtbuilder
ToastEater
Adding EQ last minute b4 a beach holiday...
Replies
8
Views
246
ToastEater
ToastEater
D
No more deca
Replies
10
Views
484
Elektrobot
Elektrobot

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top