Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, thanks for the reply. Well, I will try another 3mg for a week and if I don't see any effect, I will switch to Tirz.
Does it make sense to take a break?
Assuming I switch to Tirz, how high should the initial dose be?
no it's gone, just got worried for nothing sorry.Yes right after injection it can happen. It should dissipate soon. Is it still like this?
Anyone else experienced troath pain with tirz? as soon as i injected my troath started hurting a little. it's been about 5hours and it still hurts(it's just a minor pain but never heard of this) not swollen and I can breathe and eat fine
second. last week 2.5 noticed slower digestion but nothing else. did 5mg today, immediatly noticed I felt fuller after eating a much smaller lunch than usual but got a sore throat, no acid reflux, no nausea.Like sore? Acid reflux is common. But is this your first dose? That's really fast if it is.
second. last week 2.5 noticed slower digestion but nothing else. did 5mg today, immediatly noticed I felt fuller after eating a much smaller lunch than usual but got a sore throat, no acid reflux, no nausea.
Assuming I switch to Tirz, how high should the initial dose be?
that's right. Might as well take clen at that pointAnd the UGL/compounded stuff is less than worthless, since they don't have the absorption enhancers that allow even the tiny bit that manages to get absorbed from the pharma version get through.
I'm not very knowledgable on the matter but I would think that any anti-oxidant/ anti inflammatory molecule would help liver funcion.Would appreciate any experience, supplement recommendations, medications and so on!
o o

This was published by Altimmune in Jan 2025.
View attachment 315947
Page 15
I dont think any source carries Pem yet.
I believe that Pem is equally split between GLP1 and GCGR whereas Reta is higher GIP and the remainder balanced between GLP1 and GCGR. (Someone please correct me if i'm wrong). That would mean that Pem has higher GCGR (vs Ret) and that the lean loss isnt due to GCGR?
Could the difference in lean loss be due to Pem having a longer half life (7d vs Tirz and Reta) and that the doses in Reta were escalated too quickly (36 weeks study)?
The difference is because they’re pretending that MRI scans and DEXA scans are measuring the same thing. And they’re pretending that you can make a meaningful comparison between different drugs by looking at an obesity trial for one and a diabetes trial for another. Bonus points because they did both of these things at the same time.This was published by Altimmune in Jan 2025.
View attachment 315947
Page 15
I dont think any source carries Pem yet.
I believe that Pem is equally split between GLP1 and GCGR whereas Reta is higher GIP and the remainder balanced between GLP1 and GCGR. (Someone please correct me if i'm wrong). That would mean that Pem has higher GCGR (vs Ret) and that the lean loss isnt due to GCGR? It should not be due to GIP either because Tirz has much higher GIP (vs GLP1).
Could the difference in lean loss be due to Pem having a longer half life (7d vs Tirz and Reta) and that the doses in Reta were escalated too quickly (36 weeks study)?
Wasn't the loss of lean mass just due to calorie deficit and lower protein intake without resistance training? I'd think that lean mass loss would just increase with longer duration of the treatmenet and higher doses/stronger drugs because of prolonger/steeper deficit and lower protein.This was published by Altimmune in Jan 2025.
View attachment 315947
The lean mass lost is mostly all bullshit in these trials because they haven't checked it on ppl resistance training and eating healthy food with good amount of protein.This was published by Altimmune in Jan 2025.
View attachment 315947
Page 15
I dont think any source carries Pem yet.
I believe that Pem is equally split between GLP1 and GCGR whereas Reta is higher GIP and the remainder balanced between GLP1 and GCGR. (Someone please correct me if i'm wrong). That would mean that Pem has higher GCGR (vs Ret) and that the lean loss isnt due to GCGR? It should not be due to GIP either because Tirz has much higher GIP (vs GLP1).
Could the difference in lean loss be due to Pem having a longer half life (7d vs Tirz and Reta) and that the doses in Reta were escalated too quickly (36 weeks study)?
I suspect a lot of that "muscle loss" is actually glicogen and intramuscular water loss. If you were at maintnance/surplus and got a dexa scan, then went into a deficit for 4-6week and got another the scan would show a significat muscle loss, but in reality that's mostly water and glicogen.The lean mass lost is mostly all bullshit in these trials because they haven't checked it on ppl resistance training and eating healthy food with good amount of protein.
There are few big users here smashing 10/15mg of reta and tirz and sure as hell they ain't losing muscle xD
Of course if you starve yourself you are gonna lose muscle and fat....it's not like glp-1 are muscle sparing like some fat burner substances.
It’s helpful to understand what “lean mass” is. Our friends at Altimmune helpfully provided MRI scan data for body composition changes with Pemvidutide. Maybe other pharma companies could do the same, that would be nice. MRIs provide quite nice specificity about that.Wasn't the loss of lean mass just due to calorie deficit and lower protein intake without resistance training? I'd think that lean mass loss would just increase with longer duration of the treatmenet and higher doses/stronger drugs because of prolonger/steeper deficit and lower protein.
Or do GLPs have a direct effect on muscle mass?
Also they are using MRIs and DEXAs to determine muscle loss and fat loss. A lot of that apparent muscle loss could just be loss of glicogen and intra-muscular water because of calorie deficit.
A better metric to determin muscle loss would be to test muscle strenght (like grip strengh, leg extension strenght, chest press 1rm strenght, etc).
Also the different agonim of the different drugs will probably have different outcomes. Sema probably causes the most nause and therefore people will probably be more incline to eat more palatable food (that are lower protein and higher fat/sugar), while the less nausea from tirz/reta and the fact that they also decrease the general desire for pleasure (junk food, alchool, sigarettes, drugs, porn) might make people eat simpler food that also happen to be more nutrient densne/higher protein.
It's all speculation tho.
I personally noticed that sema (I had an ozempic pen like 2 years ago to try) gave me terrible nausea and stomach pain but mentally I still had cravings, only used it for 2 weeks and gave up.
This time with tirz I have gotten no side effects and mentally I feel much less inclined to eat. Even when phisically hungry I can just choose to not eat and feel fine.
Might be the agonism of different receptors has different effects on the body/brain and its way of dealing with food.
