GigaloRob
Banned
FBI Randomly Used Malware on TORMail Users While Busting Pedophiles
By Ryan De Souza on January 24, 2016
Report Hints on Possible Invading of TORMail users Privacy for Capturing Global Child Porn Gang by the FBI
In 2013, the Federal Bureau of Investigation seized one of the most popular dark web email platform called TorMail and soon after the department began to rifle through the contents of the server.
Back then, the researchers suspected that the FBI deployed an NIT (network investigative technique) as well to infect the users of the site. The NIT is a term used to refer to a hacking tool used by the FBI.
However, the campaign wasn’t confirmed at the time but now the Washington Post’s report proves that the FBI do relies upon NIT usage. Yet there are now more questions than ever particularly it is unclear if the hacking was conducted on such a large scale as being speculated or not.
Most importantly, what did the FBI do with the data received from the privacy-oriented email service?
The last two paragraphs of the Washington Post report talk about the TorMail issue, which informed that the email service of Tor was allegedly used by fraudsters, child pornographers, drug vendors and Silk Road employees.
Washington Post’s report states: “This week, people familiar with the investigation confirmed the FBI had used an NIT on TorMail.”
The article further informed readers that the agency obtained a warrant for hacking certain email accounts, owned by people suspected to be involved in child pornography activities.
“Using a privacy-preserving communication service is not an invitation, or a justification, for the government to hack your computer.”
This implies that the FBI was busy in targeting specific users instead of invading the privacy of innocent users. However, considering the previous reports on the way the FBI deployed the NIT previously, it seems quite unlikely that the hacking was targeted, states the Washington Post report.
The question that arises in a common person’s mind is that how could the FBI target specific email accounts owned by perpetrators of child pornography.
According to American Civil Liberties Union’s principal technologist Christopher Sohogian, “there were certainly large numbers of TorMail users who were not engaging in any criminal activity.”
“If the government, in fact, delivered an NIT to every single person who logged into TorMail, then the government went too far; using a privacy-preserving communication service is not an invitation, or a justification, for the government to hack your computer,” he added.
Sohogian opines that “this case was from 2013: we still don’t have the NIT order, or the NIT application,” which means that it is yet unclear if the judge who approved NIT really understood what was being authorized.
An FBI’s spokesperson Christopher Allen when asked to give his opinion on the recent report from the Washington Post, said that: “I would not be able to comment one way or the other on your specific question.”
Much later in 2015, the FBI conducted a yet unprecedented hacking spree in which the agency deployed malware infections on at least 1000 computers, which were being used for visiting a particular child pornography website. This particular move was part of an extensive operation called Operation Pacifier.
Operation Pacifier was a huge, multi-agency investigation into the growing issue of child pornography on the dark web.
By Ryan De Souza on January 24, 2016
Report Hints on Possible Invading of TORMail users Privacy for Capturing Global Child Porn Gang by the FBI
In 2013, the Federal Bureau of Investigation seized one of the most popular dark web email platform called TorMail and soon after the department began to rifle through the contents of the server.
Back then, the researchers suspected that the FBI deployed an NIT (network investigative technique) as well to infect the users of the site. The NIT is a term used to refer to a hacking tool used by the FBI.
However, the campaign wasn’t confirmed at the time but now the Washington Post’s report proves that the FBI do relies upon NIT usage. Yet there are now more questions than ever particularly it is unclear if the hacking was conducted on such a large scale as being speculated or not.
Most importantly, what did the FBI do with the data received from the privacy-oriented email service?
The last two paragraphs of the Washington Post report talk about the TorMail issue, which informed that the email service of Tor was allegedly used by fraudsters, child pornographers, drug vendors and Silk Road employees.
Washington Post’s report states: “This week, people familiar with the investigation confirmed the FBI had used an NIT on TorMail.”
The article further informed readers that the agency obtained a warrant for hacking certain email accounts, owned by people suspected to be involved in child pornography activities.
“Using a privacy-preserving communication service is not an invitation, or a justification, for the government to hack your computer.”
This implies that the FBI was busy in targeting specific users instead of invading the privacy of innocent users. However, considering the previous reports on the way the FBI deployed the NIT previously, it seems quite unlikely that the hacking was targeted, states the Washington Post report.
The question that arises in a common person’s mind is that how could the FBI target specific email accounts owned by perpetrators of child pornography.
According to American Civil Liberties Union’s principal technologist Christopher Sohogian, “there were certainly large numbers of TorMail users who were not engaging in any criminal activity.”
“If the government, in fact, delivered an NIT to every single person who logged into TorMail, then the government went too far; using a privacy-preserving communication service is not an invitation, or a justification, for the government to hack your computer,” he added.
Sohogian opines that “this case was from 2013: we still don’t have the NIT order, or the NIT application,” which means that it is yet unclear if the judge who approved NIT really understood what was being authorized.
An FBI’s spokesperson Christopher Allen when asked to give his opinion on the recent report from the Washington Post, said that: “I would not be able to comment one way or the other on your specific question.”
Much later in 2015, the FBI conducted a yet unprecedented hacking spree in which the agency deployed malware infections on at least 1000 computers, which were being used for visiting a particular child pornography website. This particular move was part of an extensive operation called Operation Pacifier.
Operation Pacifier was a huge, multi-agency investigation into the growing issue of child pornography on the dark web.
