Dutch Labs - test reports

Placed my first order from Dutchlabs! Quick question John, is the Mast Prop the same batch as tested that you show on the jano results?
Anyone running this?
 
Placed my first order from Dutchlabs! Quick question John, is the Mast Prop the same batch as tested that you show on the jano results?
Anyone running this?
If I'm not mistaken you can find the Jano test sheet of the current batch for sale, on the product page at all times.
 
yes you can, just wondering if its gonna be the same batch. I guess im getting a little ancy waiting on it. Has anyone run this mast prop???
 
@Photon @readalot

What is the latest consensus on GCMS testing? Is it still useful for raws with lower purity? (e.g. my Tren E has ~ 85%)

I remember reading it had limitations and could not be relied upon for detecting toxic substances, but it did catch plastics or something?

I'm willing to do a test on it for science, but only if it's useful still.
 
@Photon @readalot

What is the latest consensus on GCMS testing? Is it still useful for raws with lower purity? (e.g. my Tren E has ~ 85%)

I remember reading it had limitations and could not be relied upon for detecting toxic substances, but it did catch plastics or something?

I'm willing to do a test on it for science, but only if it's useful still.
Yes with the right person interpreting the test.

Careful with the AutoIDs.


Commentary above or search GCMS for many examples with raws and oils. Vendors can no longer hide their resold Chinese oils now.
 
@Photon @readalot

What is the latest consensus on GCMS testing? Is it still useful for raws with lower purity? (e.g. my Tren E has ~ 85%)

I remember reading it had limitations and could not be relied upon for detecting toxic substances, but it did catch plastics or something?

I'm willing to do a test on it for science, but only if it's useful still.

It looks like you might have gotten the same batch of raws I got from AASRaws which I'm hoping to get refunded for...

There are limitations with it -- it only detects volatile substances. A low purity raw with non-volatile toxic substance will turn up clean, unfortunately. We have no other test besides this for contamination, which does limit our options.

85% is a little low for TRE, especially given how some vendors are receiving 96% TRE and 98% TRA. If you plan to use it, I'd GCMS, probably not for science but for assurance it's good to sell or use.

Thank you for offering to help out with the science :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top