MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
MESO-Rx Sponsor Driada Medical
- Thread starter Driada Medical
- Start date
TyLu17
Member
I think you misunderstood...
The question was whether the data leak came from Driada itself or from the German negotiator.
You know, nobody's infallible, not even the biggest UGL‘s….
and that's it!
Exactly. If our system had actually been compromised, the first thing anyone would have seen wouldn’t be customer data — there’s simply too much of it for authorities to realistically process even 10%.
They would have seen our internal data first. And trust me, at that point you would understand immediately what was going on.
It would be so obvious that there wouldn’t even be a debate like “did it happen or didn’t it happen.” There would be no one left here to argue with — you’d be sitting alone in this thread, just like what happened back in the Cat Cafe days.
What honestly amuses me is how anxious some so-called “dominant alpha males” turn out to be — guys injecting testosterone, flexing their biceps in the mirror — genuinely believing that police are about to kick down their doors, twist their arms, and haul them away over 10 vials and two aromatase inhibitors
And of course, the best part: the idea that simply switching to another brand suddenly puts you into some magical “safe zone” where nothing can happen to you. That’s genuinely hilarious.
We are responding only because many people on this forum buy steroids without truly understanding what that means in terms of legal responsibility and potential risks.
So we often have to explain things very plainly — almost like to small children — that as end users they are of no real interest to authorities, and to calm them down so they don’t start wasting money on lawyers, “legal insurance,” or even psychiatrists out of pure panic.
As for us: we closely monitor situations like this involving any companies or major resellers, regardless of which brands are involved.
In most cases, large resellers don’t deal with just one brand anyway — they usually carry three or four brands plus counterfeit pharmaceutical products (especially when we’re talking about regions like Bulgaria or Moldova).
We track these cases to understand how often such incidents occur, which regions are higher risk, and how severe the legal consequences actually are in each situation. This gives us a broad and realistic understanding of how these processes work, how they usually end, and what precautions actually make sense if someone wants to minimize risk.
Of course that’s the case — just like the names of all other well-known brands appear in investigations.
That’s a fact and it doesn’t require any special verification.
In fact, the longer a brand has been on the market, the more often its name will show up. Just imagine how much data exists on brands that have been active in Europe for 10+ years — and there are plenty of those, even on this very forum.
So please, before posting or making claims, try to think about the logic behind what you’re saying. At least a little.
Don’t worry, mate. You — are not of any interest to the authorities. If there had been any kind of data leak, the focus would be on us, not on individual customers likes you.
Let’s go through everything step by step.
I repeat this from one of my previous messages:
"It’s important to understand the context: this person is a content creator. His format relies on provocation, fear, and then offering “help” via private messages. In reality, this is advertising his services. He directly encourages people to contact him, purchase legal or “criminal” insurance, and so on — in other words, he profits from creating panic.
At the same time, he makes assumptions about an alleged data breach without any facts or understanding of what actually happened. There has been no breach of our system, and as of now there has not been a single seizure of packages from our customers. We are always aware of such situations because we closely monitor them, and in the case of any confiscations we receive information directly from customers through our support team. Orders and shipments are operating normally, with no reason for concern."
So next,
What actually happened
In April 2025, a large investigation was launched involving the transportation of prohibited goods (primarily weapon parts) from Europe to Russia through Eastern European countries. One logistics company was involved in this operation. During the investigation, law enforcement conducted mass inspections and seizures of parcels passing through this logistics chain.This company was used by nearly all major European brands, including us. That is why most brands experienced serious shipping issues in May and throughout the summer, and some are still affected today.
As part of this operation, a large number of shipments were seized, including parcels containing Driada Medical products. This is the sole reason why some customers may have received standard customs letters. There was no data leak and no targeted investigation against our brand.
All attempts to link these events to a “database hack” are nothing more than speculation from someone who does not know the real situation and is inventing their own narrative.
About system security
We regularly commission professional cybersecurity audits from companies that specialize in penetration testing and simulated hacking attacks.The results show that our system is fully protected against unauthorized access. A breach of our IT infrastructure and access to customer data is not possible. As the largest company in Europe in this field, system security is a top priority for us, and we have taken care of this accordingly. From this perspective, there is nothing for you to worry about.
About letters and “risks” for customers
The parcel seizures that occurred in April last year are the only real reason why some customers may have received notifications from customs. This is a standard administrative procedure, not something extraordinary. Looking at the entire history of the anabolic steroid market in Europe, there is not a single case where an end user suffered serious consequences. Customers have never received prison sentences, and this is logical — end users are not of interest to law enforcement. Occasionally, especially in Germany and Austria, administrative fines of €150–300 may be issued. That’s where it ends. These are minor administrative matters that are not of systemic interest to the authorities. The focus is always on sellers and distributors, not users.About “data tracking” and payments
There is also a lot of fear around data storage, payments, and cryptocurrencies. In reality, this is greatly exaggerated.The most vulnerable point has always been and remains physical delivery, not the payment method. Neither bank transfers, nor crypto payments, nor the mere storage of data constitute proof of illegal activity. In the vast majority of cases, matters are limited to a confiscated package, an administrative fine, and case closure. No further action is taken against the buyer.
About searches and resellers
Yes, one large reseller in Germany was detained in the autumn, and the investigation is ongoing. But this is not a unique case.If you look broadly, all major European brands appear from time to time in cases involving large resellers. From time to time, customs intercept large volumes and investigations begin — this is a normal and long-established process. This has no direct relation to our store, and attempts to tie everything into one story are simply a way to attract attention and gain clients for legal services.
Similar threads
