CNraws, Private source for members only

Not alarming and still respectable for these days.

Dbol is usually from 96% to 98%

Winstrol can vary from 90% to 98%, it's one of those hit or miss compounds.

Jano variance is 5%.
I think we should focus more on what impurities are (GCMS) as long as purity is above a certain threshold, due to the testing variances..
 

3. Blind common anabolic steroid and aromatase inhibitors screening - raws (purity testing):
1. Margin of error: 5%
3. Detection limit cutoff: 50%.

Maybe this it outdated?
I think he offers a higher on paper but if you talk to him personally it's lower. It's like an expiration date, number is much sooner than reality.

Mast oils are very problematic and EQ raws are not great with homogeneity, if I recall correctly. @janoshik
 
@Photon not arguing you, just known of him since he 1st showed up and do time from time have these conversations with him privately.

I'll always follow something like this with him tagged for him to correct me if I'm wrong and if correct help the rest of us.

I got some tren e off QSC 1 week before they left that tested 87.93%, he found 9% moisture in it. So beside wondering about the impurities, find out if it's moisture also.

They can be rushing through the drying process leaving moisture behind that is costing us the drop in purity as well. This had been the main issue with tren a for decades but never tren e.

I had never seen in over 15 years tren e that low, nor Jano, it was the beginning of lower purity last year. Moisture was the issue with that batch.
 
@Photon not arguing you, just known of him since he 1st showed up and do time from time have these conversations with him privately.

I'll always follow something like this with him tagged for him to correct me if I'm wrong and if correct help the rest of us.

I got some tren e off QSC 1 week before they left that tested 87.93%, he found 9% moisture in it. So beside wondering about the impurities, find out if it's moisture also.

They can be rushing through the drying process leaving moisture behind that is costing us the drop in purity as well. This had been the main issue with tren a for decades but never tren e.

I had never seen in over 15 years tren e that low, nor Jano, it was the beginning of lower purity last year. Moisture was the issue with that batch.

I know.
I'm just trying to figure out the variance levels, since it does make a difference between raws being labeled as "crap/usable/good". Sadly there isn't much info on each, especially not for each product.

i believe a conservative estimate of 5% is reasonable in abscence of such data, but it does make it hard to gauge if let's say 90% raws are actually 85% or 95%.

(Ofc there's distributions too..but that's getting too specific)
(Oils are usually overdosed/overfilled..so I don't think it's that much of an issue)


Masteron oils, especially mast e, tend to be difficult indeed.

Raw situation recently been wild.

Would you by any chance have updated variance levels for popular RAWS or should we just stick to 5%?
Test
EQ
Mast
Primo
 
Last edited:
Are you saying if we put CNRaws on the report you'll give $120USD credit for each report?
After ordering stuffs from us, when you want to analysis whichever batch whenever you want to, please confirm with us and to list our brand on the report, then, the analysis cost can be covered as credit in next order. :cool:
 
I finally got around to testing the DHB I bought.
1751894976670.webp

Emailed Jano and i received this
1751894608794.webp

Looks like I did not get DHB..but an unknown ester which might be related to it..
Which got me really curious.
It gave me the worse pip ever.
Could not straighten my quad for days

Has anyone bought DHB from this source before?
I wonder if its worth to pay more to get it identified. I wont use it..pip's too bad.
 
Last edited:

Sponsors

Back
Top