Clear Pharma testing results

[jitterbug128]

It ends up there from the manufacturer. These raws came from AAS raws. .
As for why it's in there there is a lot of unknowns. Storage condition's? Synthesis? It's minor in any case and likely nothing to be concerned about all things considering.

We are basically at a point of dimishing returns. Janos on raws for this coming at 96+ purity. I'd be more concerned if raws was below that.

View attachment 380217

Yeah not so much concerned as just curious about the intricacies, is that bit in the red actually distinguishable from standard mct?

 

[Walter Hype]

Yeah not so much concerned as just curious about the intricacies, is that bit in the red actually distinguishable from standard mct?

Kinda. We need more gcms data from sources. It's actually more rare to get a source to openly post gcms than it is not as it exposes the source to more criticism. We need more sources to post gcms to get that kinda of data your wanting answers to. I got nothing to compare myself to......I did use mig 812 but what if it has zero difference? Would be a shocker to me to say the least but I'll keep using it as it does indeed filter smoother than any oil I've used so far. That pays for itself

 

[Walter Hype]

@dinfar1337 how many gcms on MCT based testing results for test cyp exist publicly I can look over. Better yet any with sources claiming to use mig 812??

 

[Photon]

I did use mig 812 but what if it has zero difference? Would be a shocker to me to say the least but I'll keep using it as it does indeed filter smoother than any oil I've used so far. That pays for itself

There's no difference in GCMS 812 vs MCT.
It's C8 C10.

Unfortunately, also means any vendor can claim it, as long as they use pure MCT.

You can compare against this if you want.
There's probably a test for Mig812 but I'm not sure if its necessary.

Janoshik Analytical

 

[jitterbug128]

There's no difference in GCMS 812 vs MCT.
It's C8 C10.

Unfortunately, also means any vendor can claim it, as long as they use pure MCT.

You can compare against this if you want.
There's probably a test for Mig812 but I'm not sure if its necessary.

Janoshik Analytical

If the gcms is identical, how is mig 812 even different in applicaton? Is the ratio of c8/c10 just different in mig 812

 

[Photon]

If the gcms is identical, how is mig 812 even different in applicaton? Is the ratio of c8/c10 just different in mig 812

That's not really the purpose of GCMS, which is why you don't see any difference. The testing that we mainly use right now focuses on dosage (most common - mg/ml) and contamination (rarely done - GCMS). Nobody actually talks about about testing oil quality.

 

[jitterbug128]

That's not really the purpose of GCMS, which is why you don't see any difference. The testing that we mainly use right now focuses on dosage (most common - mg/ml) and contamination (rarely done - GCMS). Nobody actually talks about about testing oil quality.

Ah, that makes sense i suppose i misunderstood gcms in general, what would actually test for oil quality?