MESO-Rx Sponsor AASraw: GMP-Certified Steroid and Peptide API Manufacturer

It's be much easier if they were on this board or are even willing to answer questions. It's hard enough paying AB to run tests.

Id think the labs are all using different reference standards for detecting compounds. Jano makes their own I believe, where does AB come from? I recently approached a lab for testing of some weird compound and they pretty much told me they had to order the standard, gave me the link of the company they're ordering for and said they will charge it to me for it. (E.g Sigma Aldrich)

There was recent testing done by a vendor for both Jano and AB and it's clear that there exists a 3-5 difference in results as purity starts to drop. Something is obviously being missed out by one party or added incorrectly by the other. Also pretty clear from the Tren raws that I and this vendor tested. Both came back 85% but AB gave an extra 10%! Where's that come from?
This I can agree on, AB and Lab4Tox are very good but communication is horrible most the time, I don't know if it's a language barrier.

Some feel AB comes from Lab4Tox, employees that is, they seem to be very identical. So the whole Lab4Tox is good but AB isn't makes no sense as some believe they are a branch off of Lab4Tox, just in a different city.

I feel for the last year Jano's team can be off, as he said mistakes happen.

None are going to come on here like Jano, I even got Jano on a private board of ours. Jano has 0 communication issues.

All that matters is people are working to be better and we have options, most won't have the patience of Lab4Tox or AB. Jano suits the mass population.
 
View attachment 377780

Received more Test C today. Label with Ship date 1.22.26. Small test batch dissolved fine, appears ok. Smells like that chemical pineapple smell.

Raws from this batch already otw to jano for testing.
Well yours behaved better than my batch from mid November. Mine has the pineapple smell, but did NOT dissolve okay in solution.
However, the sediment filtered out just fine and the injection is PIP free. I have not taken enough of it yet to judge the potency, but I'll assume it's decent or else this source would be getting steam rolled in the comments
 
I read back through the posts thanks for adding that background. It does seem uniform to me, but I'll pour a larger amount of it out and take a close up picture for clarity.
remaining the same in all cases and at all times; unchanging in form or character.

heres uniform definition for you

"unchanging in form" dosent look like the crystals are same sized to me xd
 
TRANSPARENCY.
BUYER BEWARE.


1) Reps giving different prices for raws at the same time.


2) Selling products and collecting payment without informing customers it's a pre-order. Constantly changing delivery dates after payment is received.


3) Advertising with fake reports. TNE advertised as 98% but 3rd party tested twice as 87% and once at 83%. MENT advertised as 98%, 3rd party tested 88%. Refusing to acknowledge delivery of poor quality products.


4) Advertising with Jano reports but refusing to acknowledge low purity 3rd party ones even for the ones they send it. Tren 85%, tested by vendor and 3rd party, both ignored, claiming lab is wrong.


5) Raws completely won't dissolve, vendor claiming residual solvents are present. Raws with residual solvents are not safe to use and should not be sold.


6) Claiming to reship but refusing when product seized.


7) Selling really poor quality NPP raws, smelly, dark yellow, filled with debris. Advertised as 98% pure with useless internal testing reports. Only reimbursed with 10% credit.


The best part is that this is only the past few months.
So much more crap if you start from the start of the year.
I'm not going through that shit.


I'm going to update this and create a new thread on it's own.
Additional issues are
(1) screw found in raws
(2) sending different batches of raws (two bags of TC raws purchased, sent on same date, one brews, other doesn't, yet both advertised with same test results.)
(3) multiple reports of unusable TC

Is there anything else i may have missed?
 
Last edited:
I'm going to update this and create a new thread on it's own.
Additional issues are
(1) screw found in raws
(2) sending different batches of raws (two bags of TC raws purchased, sent on same date, one brews, other doesn't, yet both advertised with same test results.)
(3) multiple reports of unusable TC

Is there anything else i may have missed?
The corresponding nut was never delivered to the customer.

Jk jk couldn't help myself.

I agree and it is a pity for those who were unfortunate to get the unusable raws and had to discard them. Even if you get happy with what you receive, you are afraid of giving a good review because it can lead to someone else's loss. @AASraw should have just handled it differently and listened to customers instead of being intransigent.

I also think @Millard or whoever handles these things should take a look, since this is a forum sponsor.
 
millard wont handle this, this is a community issue. normally they would get filtered out instantly but there is really not much public better option out there so it stays relevant for now.

he is doing his job right

That last line reminds me of one of my favorite quotes on Futurama. And I do think it applies to Millard. I'm so glad we have this board and it looks nothing like ProM or SST
"When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all."
 
millard wont handle this, this is a community issue. normally they would get filtered out instantly but there is really not much public better option out there so it stays relevant for now.

he is doing his job right
That last line reminds me of one of my favorite quotes on Futurama. And I do think it applies to Millard. I'm so glad we have this board and it looks nothing like ProM or SST
"When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all."
I understand, this is a better way.
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top