A Reply to a PM.......

BBC3

New Member
10+ Year Member
I have reached a point where I disagree with steroid use in many, and due to underlying principles. I have been exactly where you are and plateaued in my attemp to restore my fitness right about where you have.

You are a classic - ME. Your excessive body fat is causing too much estrogen aromatiztion that cannot begin to be quantified by a single SERUM COUNT. Research some of my posts on this. The workout and diet have got you about as far as I did, however, you have reached a point where the remaining excess estrogen has limited your success (and probably you diet and time in the gym). Make no mistake. As an adult, if you eat in excess of 2000 calories you are gonna stay fat as the human body is a WORK MACHINE that requires many miles or work per day.

Serms and AI's, IMO, will get you nowhere in the long run as I suspect the body circumvents them to whatever extent is required to meet current demands. This WILL NOT SHOW IN SERUM COUNT EVEN IF NUMBER GO LOW. Serum count, IMO, is nothing more than ACTIVE BLOOD SURPLUS. Consider, how do you konw the actual count of hormones being exchanged? You dont. But you can bet they are.

Your gyno will be a problem till you have it surgically removed. I have found that ANY supplementation will activate and feed once in place. The SERM is the best bet to stave off growth otherwise. This tissue also has the propensity to metabolise Free T into estrogen, etc.. and I speculate at a good rate. Further, no one seems to know the lifespan of estrogens, and how far they go one once created at a receptor site (gyno, fat, etc..) to act on other receptors. (Does a pre-manufactured E2 molecule have a stronger propensity to find and stick with a receptor?, etc..)

I think there may be a lot to diet, BLOOD SUGAR & INSULIN, drugs on the liver, etc.. that impacts hormone metabolism significantly.

I see you hormonal issue as follows, you have maintained success to date based solely on work and diet as they relate to your previous weight. You are a one-eyed squirrel who could gather enough nuts to get so far, but now the lack of the other eye is causing loss to competition. The competition is now the estrogen more than even as the balance equalizes. (your efforts have to be slacking by now as well I suspect). Most likely WORK & diet have been the primary MODE to your success to date, and the hormones and drugs have been a VAST Overkill and hendrance not noted due to.

Consider this. Initially, Your body MAY HAVE limited TT production in order to protect from further estrogen based growth. The body is a DEMAND BASED ENVIRONMENT/MACHINE. So if TT was limited based on estrogens, then androgen receptors are left to suffer, and "just get by at best". So how much sythetic TT does it actually take to BE EFFECTIVE in countering this estrogen donminant starvation taking place? Not much.

The CYCLE can result in a VICIOUS outcome if left unacknowledged or addressed. This is the birth of today's LOW-T MALE. Imagine you are young and healthy. You get out of college and go to work no longer getting to the gym. As you get fat, estrogens will soon predominate. Your body says "whoa!", and shuts down TT production (as a top of the chain reaction). So now predominant estrogens (relative to intended physical genetic makeup) take control of supply remaining. You feel like shit and cant develop androgen based tissue readily. You check out of the gym early (on the day you actually found the time), go home and eat, and the muscles never got the work to create the demand. Now continue this cycle for years. FAT REMAINS AT LEAST THE SAME, but Androgen based tissue continues to dwindle. So now you are left with a body which supplies enough TT to feed REALLY predominating estrogen based tissues with EVEN LESS androgen based tissue to order a demand, or function normally. There has to be an effective curve with this as I am sure once estrogen tissues have a strong majority - they are going to snap up all the free T that comes along. The cycle continues till you are a fat helpless jellyroll, like me:). And now you are fucked in ways you can not even comprehend so any attempts to normalize fail quickly.

What is my solution? I have been down the TRT road (and much higher). I have PROVEN to myseft that the issue is infractructure demand and NOT SUPPLY. You can pour SynT in and get nothing once estrogens predominate. Nothing but bad that is. I am planning the following:
(1) No alcohol - as a calorie reduction primarily.

(2) To continue to refine the diet in a month moving to soft drinks out.

(3) I am going to make another run at TRT, but this time more logically. MORE IS NOT BETTER.

(4) I am planning a 200mg injection of cyp per month as a SUPPLEMENT. The human body metabolises a speculated amount of 7-10 mgs of TT per day. However, I believe this concept is based on measuring require supplementation in males castrated. So it does not account for SHRINKAGE. the figure may very well be half of this. The concept is to provide a STEADY TRICKLE of 1-3 mgs of TT per day over the month. This accomplishes the restoration of Estrogen bottlenecked TT production while NOT ALLOWING for excecssive amounts of TT for Estrogen armomatization. The ONLY WAY THIS WILL WORK is if you are exercising daily. You may find even more success in this method than the 200mgs per week, and you are not feeding an ESTROGEN INFERNO that is countering your productivity.

(5) AI's are useless as they work on the enzyme level. Estrogen
based tissue WILL GET FED REGARDLESS if you E2 level is 100, or 20. They will get it at the SAME RATE. Remember the tissue is the driving force at the point of the receptor. So with regard to AVAILABILITY of Free T to make hormonal conversions to estrogens OR ANDRGENS, again, the issue is not whether you measure 20 of them boucing aound the receptor, or 5000. ONE IS ALL IT NEEDS. Again, SERUM COUNTS ARE WORTHLESS.!!!

(6) As for your gyno. You will need to have that nipped out IMO. This is going nowhere. It may subside in fullness due to minimized estrogen/prolactin activity as a result on no homonal supping, or even an AI (as a vehicle to disrupt the Prolactive that is filling the tissue with male lactate). But the best way to protect from further breast development if you are not ready to have it cut out, is to use TAMOXIFEN (SERM). This will BLOCK the estrogen at the site. Still, I will limit my Monthly SynT to three month training intervals in order to limit the application of ancillary drugs (if Tamox does prove necessary at this dose and on this exercise regimen). You MAY need it for sure if significant gyno is in place.

(7) You also have to consider the implications of breast cancer in men. This is THE GREATEST oversight in steroid use as TRT that I could imagine. Consider even that in the past steroid use has been confined publicly to pro body builders who do not have enough estrogen to develop gyno (usually). The new wave of TRT for the "Low-T Male" is going to prove DISASTEROUS down the road - medically. As in short, all this new trend of treatment is goint to do is procreate an ENTIRE GENERATION OF BITCH TIT.... Who I fear will be suffering from breast cancer as early as their Sixties. I saw a study published here that stated the breast cancer rate in men with Nodules, gyno, or "bb's" present was 50% !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We are the next great social BETA TEST I fear, and release COMPLETELY UNEDUCATED, IGNORANT, and with ONE OF THE POOREST documented medical practices in a while at this SCALE....

HGH - My verdict is not in.. However, I would lean toward that LONG BEFORE IGF-1. This boils down to a concept I am working on as to whether the applcation of HGH can restore tissue at the MOST FUNDAMENTAL LEVELS, thus creating new healthy. VS suspected IFG-1 only thowing fuel on a fire of who knows what...

HCG - Worthless and a hindrance over all.

Anavar - Surely leading to the destruction of the esophagus in many I SUSPECT. LOL

Keep in mind. The REAL FIX for the low T male is the application of TRUE Finished product androgens, or a close as possible. THIS IS NOT WHAT TESTOSTERONE IS. I am not familiar enough with the other steroids available which may have this profile to speculate (tren, etc).. I am also unsure the negative co-effects that could result (side effect of other roids). You may NEVER see androgens prescribed on ANY LEVEL. I equate this to Adderall vs. the more strongly bonded amphetamines closer to METH, as speaking politically, not directly comparitively.

I think YOU are referring to using a testosterone cream. At 10% you are getting probably 5MGs per day. Still too much. But the furher issue there would be the direct application to adipose tissue (fat), moreso than an intramuscular application.

I am also considering pellet implants. Everyone I have seen using this has had GREAT SUCCESS in comparison to even IM TRT. or PATCHES/GELS. Its ALL going in the muscle and going MORE DIRECTLY to the intended tissue, IMO. You get the slow dispersion and not even an ester to worry with. Keep in mind a Cyp ester must probably go a good 2-4 weeks to stabilize and disperse steadily if injected properly. This is not an issue with creams. So I WOULD recommend you investigate pellet implants. But: Creams ='s skin>
='s BACK THROUGH THE FAT>
='s estrogen aromatization.
Again, a massive failure in modern medicine due to ignorance and lack of study.

PROP - Good ester for megadosing in BB. Not necessary.

TREN - Illegal, not necessary for OUR Goals, too many other complications. OUR fix is PRIMARILY IN LIFESTYLE AND DIET. A LITTLE SynT May not hurt to catch a ride on the way... Watch the Gyno and Use Tamox if it persist in minimal SynT application and you are not meriting surgey.:)

YOU ASKED. You got it. This if probably my most succinct conglomeration of OPINION that I have ever distribute and based on 5 solid years of person research - And thanks to THIS SITE has made it possible!

One Further note on SERM use to stimulate HPTA. I have come to suspect that the is no DIRECT Stimulation of TT production through SERM use. But an indirect stimulation serving iva the receptor blockage (antagonist) as a means to RESET predominating site affinity (andrgoen vs. estrogen), and also to stimulate HPTA via the actual agaonist effects in high muscle content males via the induced estrogenic activity at sites otherwise involved with adrogens as a result of excess androgen activity prolonged, thus re-triggering production. So I am not saying SERMS dont work to stimulate HPTA. I AM saying they do it by means of receptor interaction and not at the brain (as many think). I am also saying that a SERM RESET may be critical in high body fat LowT Males as a means to restoration. And effective in as little as two weeks total application from time to time. Anyone who wishes to argue this is welcome, Just show me where an elevated TT serum count give ANY indication of hormone metaboism rates (other than a slowdown, IMO), or show me where it is documented that the effect even in measured serum count can last more than a brief while. I feel the elevated TT counts, especially in Male BBs is a direct reflection of slowed ACTUAL TT Metabolism rates due to estrogenic activity resulting in receptors otherwise inudated and current involved with androgens, now blocked by drug induced estrogen control. I am still hypothesizing that one. So YES limited SERM use can also CORRECT receptor imbalances thus leading to a more natural hormone metabolism profile me thinks.

YES, I am going to turn this world UP SIDE DOWN...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D;)

The REST,,,,,,, IS all HORSE SHIT... IMO...




forevergreat said:
hello,

i am wondering if you can help me.
i was diagnosed with low t , gyno, andro, pre -diabetes, high cholestorol.
I lost 75lbs i am 38 5'11 190 25%bf, my goal is to get to 14%bf.


one doc put my on hgh, arimidex 1mcg,hcg, and test cyp/pro 10%
i was doing ok but i wasnt getting any stronger or building up lean body mass with my workouts, and my general well being was starting to slow down.
then i went on the same regimen, hcg, hgh, armidex, test ethanathe, anavar, cytomel. i am doing ok but still no major changes.
a friend recommended to try tren, and prop. i felt great my first day and then after that i am not feeling the major pump i got the first day when i added it to my other concoctions.
i have noticed since using the tren, my ed went worse.

i was told i should go back to old cycle and ad proviron with the anavar and test and that should help me advance.

i thank you in advance for reading this and i hope you can give me some advise. thank you.
 
(4) I am planning a 200mg injection of cyp per month as a SUPPLEMENT. The human body metabolises a speculated amount of 7-10 mgs of TT per day. However, I believe this concept is based on measuring require supplementation in males castrated. So it does not account for SHRINKAGE. the figure may very well be half of this. The concept is to provide a STEADY TRICKLE of 1-3 mgs of TT per day over the month. This accomplishes the restoration of Estrogen bottlenecked TT production while NOT ALLOWING for excecssive amounts of TT for Estrogen armomatization. The ONLY WAY THIS WILL WORK is if you are exercising daily. You may find even more success in this method than the 200mgs per week, and you are not feeding an ESTROGEN INFERNO that is countering your productivity.

BBC3, this is a horrible idea. You want logical TRT do LOW doses frequently. Do 24-32 mg EOD. You will not need an AI.

Get your exercise in and get your diet in check. In check (to me) now means eating ~2,000 cals per day, predominantly fats, protein, miniscule amount of carbs, and miniscule or NO sugar.

I have been following this formula for a few months now and I cannot count the number of compliments I have been receiving on my (far from perfect) physique. I can still stand to lose about 15 more lbs...and I will.
 
I knew your bell would toll to this early on. I disagree strongly and believe this practice by Urologist primarily, may be the correct one for todays "LowT Male".

If you are comprehending a word I am saying about estrogen induced Free T deficiency for Androgen demands starving as a result. And you can acknowledge the negatives associated with feeding an estrogen inundated body. You will HAVE to agree. The ester is the key you are missing. The pellets may be the ultimate logical response.

You COULD continue to keep megadosing yourself with testosterone at absurd and unusable rates ( with the exception of the negative estrogen production will use it for sure in Low T males). Or you could back off and try the lower Uro recommended dose for 6 months and see if it provides a more lucrative fix. NO SYN T supping is a fix is no lifestyle/exercise is not implemented. Its all negative then. You have not created any new androgen demands above the current which are allready STARVE down to a dwindling but SATISFIED AT DWINDLING/LOW level..

You can not argue the logic. No one here has documented ANY SUCCESS. I have seen a few Uro bases dosers come and go for brief inquiry. But how many are still HERE - and comlaining. And I GUARANTEE you there are as many if not more URO based TRT patients as other fields. Do not throw it under the bus until you try.

Most TRT candidates BLOW right past the threshold of "productive therapy" in the second week of treatment. Then there are nothing by complaints. Yet they still cling to the "Success" from that first two weeks when the dose was not too high, and continue to punish themselves with estrogen fueling megadoses. MORE IS NOT BETTER. I AM CERTAIN OF THIS REGARDIN THE LOW T MALE...

And I Repeat - Any more than 2-3 mgs a day becomes negative in obese sedentary Low T males - IMO....

BBC3, this is a horrible idea. You want logical TRT do LOW doses frequently. Do 24-32 mg EOD. You will not need an AI.

Get your exercise in and get your diet in check. In check (to me) now means eating ~2,000 cals per day, predominantly fats, protein, miniscule amount of carbs, and miniscule or NO sugar.

I have been following this formula for a few months now and I cannot count the number of compliments I have been receiving on my (far from perfect) physique. I can still stand to lose about 15 more lbs...and I will.
 
Last edited:
I knew your bell would toll to this early on. I disagree strongly and believe this practice by Urologist primarily, may be the correct one for todays "LowT Male".

If you are comprehending a word I am saying about estrogen induced Free T deficiency for Androgen demands starving as a result. And you can acknowledge the negatives associated with feeding an estrogen inundated body. You will HAVE to agree. The ester is the key you are missing. The pellets may be the ultimate logical response.

You COULD continue to keep megadosing yourself with testosterone at absurd and unusable rates ( with the exception of the negative estrogen production will use it for sure in Low T males). Or you could back off and try the lower Uro recommended dose for 6 months and see if it provides a more lucrative fix. NO SYN T supping is a fix is no lifestyle/exercise is not implemented. Its all negative then. You have not created any new androgen demands above the current which are allready STARVE down to a dwindling but SATISFIED AT DWINDLING/LOW level..

You can not argue the logic. No one here has documented ANY SUCCESS. I have seen a few Uro bases dosers come and go for brief inquiry. But how many are still HERE - and comlaining. And I GUARANTEE you there are as many if not more URO based TRT patients as other fields. Do not throw it under the bus until you try.

Most TRT candidates BLOW right past the threshold of "productive therapy" in the second week of treatment. Then there are nothing by complaints. Yet they still cling to the "Success" from that first two weeks when the dose was not too high, and continue to punish themselves with estrogen fueling megadoses. MORE IS NOT BETTER. I AM CERTAIN OF THIS REGARDIN THE LOW T MALE...

And I Repeat - Any more than 2-3 mgs a day becomes negative in obese sedentary Low T males - IMO....


Guess we should just ignore the fact that 2-3 mg a day will do nothing but shut you down Lol. Because all of what you say is fact. How dare anyone try and disagree with your quite obvious research/ hours you must have spent coming up with your "facts". Either way, its quite fun.:drooling:
 
If you are comprehending a word I am saying about estrogen induced Free T deficiency for Androgen demands starving as a result.
Yeah, I get it, you are saying that E2 is the problem, and is a result of mostly adipose tissue. Nothing will work until E2 is under control. Got it. Your other points are basically that serum counts don't matter and what really matters is WHAT the body can use. I don't think I agree, but OK.

And you can acknowledge the negatives associated with feeding an estrogen inundated body.

I do agree.
You will HAVE to agree.
You COULD continue to keep megadosing yourself with testosterone at absurd and unusable rates ( with the exception of the negative estrogen production will use it for sure in Low T males).
Huh? I am suggesting ~12 mg per day plus or minus. This is hardly a megadose.
Or you could back off and try the lower Uro recommended dose for 6 months and see if it provides a more lucrative fix.

Your "lower uro recommended dose" is 200 MG ONCE PER MONTH. The ester will not work the way you envision it!! It will not all be stored and trickle out 2-3mg per day. It will release a LARGE amount into your body initially and slowly taper off over the course of ~2 weeks. You will end up with a MEGADOSE (T levels in the 1,500-2,000s) and E levels that are OFF THE CHARTS.


No one here has documented ANY SUCCESS.
Are you kidding me? There are MANY success stories here and elsewhere. I am PERFECT at 24-32 mgs EOD. Better towards the lower end but I digress.
Yet they still cling to the "Success" from that first two weeks when the dose was not too high, and continue to punish themselves with estrogen fueling megadoses
.
200 mg ONCE per month is ONE megadose and a bunch of failure!!!


Bax is correct.

What are suggesting (200mg once per month) has been tried by MANY doctors/patients. It always ends in failure because the ester does not keep the TT levels high enough throughout the month.
 
BAX, I have to say I TRUELY DISTAIN YOUR ENTITY. Not many people can get that one from me. FIRST OFF, exogenous testosterone ONLY shuts down to the DEGREE it is applied. It is pretty common knowledge that even a 200mg per week dose will only achieve 75% shutdown (Idiot). The CONCEPT of the once a month dose is based on the ESTER. A PROPERLY INJECTED CYP ESTER WILL TAKE ROUGHLY 60 Days to completely clear. That is COMPLETELY. THis is the concept. For the testosterone injection, or DEPOT to be effective, it must first release from FAT, and then get into circulation. So ITS SAFE TO SAY ONE WOULD BE RELEASING A 200mg dose for the period of AT LEAST ONE MONTH.

There is a notion out there that an application of this type HAS NO EFFECT ON HPTA. Here is why... FIRST, Serum counts MEAN JACK SHIT. Second a release of 2-3 mgs per day if the principle/patient is now exercising, or attempting to generate/restore androgen systems/demands, will supply ONLY THE NEW DEMAND. Therefore there is no excess to reverse feedback. PLUS you get the bonus of the body sensing the new stimulus which also in turn promotes proper testicular function.

In a single 200mg dose of test cyp, if sunk nice and correctly into the heart of a large muscle, SHOULD EFFECTIVELY Add about 10-20 mgs tops on the injection date, and then trickle there on...

While its nice to have a NEW Conci around. And a meaner one. At least show a little common knowlege and then gather your senses for some good behavior.. I agree, it is fun WHEN I AM BORED. You dont even get me loafing....:p

Guess we should just ignore the fact that 2-3 mg a day will do nothing but shut you down Lol. Because all of what you say is fact. How dare anyone try and disagree with your quite obvious research/ hours you must have spent coming up with your "facts". Either way, its quite fun.:drooling:
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I get it, you are saying that E2 is the problem, and is a result of mostly adipose tissue. Nothing will work until E2 is under control. Got it. Your other points are basically that serum counts don't matter and what really matters is WHAT the body can use. I don't think I agree, but OK.

NO - You dont get it. E2 is not a product of testosterone. ITS A PRODUCT OF RECEPTOR DEMAND. Testosterone is simply required to convert. So we are not worried so much with getting E2 under control. We are worried with getting THE CAUSE OF E2 UNDER CONTROL.



I do agree.
You will HAVE to agree.
YES - I COMPEL YOU TO AGREE> LOL

Huh? I am suggesting ~12 mg per day plus or minus. This is hardly a megadose.

I think its too much. Even after "shinkage and waste is considered you wind up with 6mgs/day minimum, but more like 8 or 9 i would guess (2-300mgs/month). So we ARE on the same page here. The difference is you are not understanding ester application. Here is the Problem. You are creating a NEW ester DEPOT every time you pin. Thus the (1) instant and wastefull release associated with the injection and (2) a smaller DEPOT to delay release. Consider a depot may act as a UNIT and larger size MAY illicet longer release. But #1 is the issue primarily.

Your "lower uro recommended dose" is 200 MG ONCE PER MONTH. The ester will not work the way you envision it!! It will not all be stored and trickle out 2-3mg per day. It will release a LARGE amount into your body initially and slowly taper off over the course of ~2 weeks. You will end up with a MEGADOSE (T levels in the 1,500-2,000s) and E levels that are OFF THE CHARTS.
I disagree if pinned properly. I recall my first bout with test and it taking almost 6 weeks to feel anything at 400mgs plus per week. This is a COMMON complaint by newbies in the Steroid Column.



Are you kidding me? There are MANY success stories here and elsewhere. I am PERFECT at 24-32 mgs EOD. Better towards the lower end but I digress.
.
200 mg ONCE per month is ONE megadose and a bunch of failure!!!


Bax is correct.
I dont think Bax has been correct here a day in his life....

What are suggesting (200mg once per month) has been tried by MANY doctors/patients. It always ends in failure because the ester does not keep the TT levels high enough throughout the month.

This notion is incorrect due to SERUM COUNTS MEAN SQUAT. It would take roughly 1MG released into circulation at once to tecnically blow serum counts to 10,000 or higher. Serum counts are merely Blood Buffer Levels. WHY DOES Serum count never go way high. ITs a matter of SHBG. There is only so much you can SATURATE the blood Proteins. PERIOD. So 95% of that above MG is PISSED OUT... Consider two factors for serum counts as they related to TRUE TT METABOLISM RATES. (1) SHBG and (2) Real Metabolism rate. Serum counts are a genetic function with growth and development of tissue factored in. This is a LONG PROCESS. Serum count (buffer supply in circulation) is going to change at AN INCREASING RATE OF RETURN given actual tissue demands. The ability of the blood volume to HOLD/RETAIN TT in SHBG IS FIXED/LOCKED for the most part due to the fact that blood VOLUME will not CHANGE - at least in the short term. THEREFORE THIS PROVES that SERUM COUNT MUST GO HIGHER AT A FASTER RATE AS TRUE TT DEMANDS INCREASE. and with another FLUX FACTOR given for natural scenarios or testicular production capability. Consider. If one day ( in a natural scenario) you are using 5 mgs of TT per day. And this requires a serum count of 250ngs/dl. Now after a year of heavy lifting you are metabolising 8 7 mgs per day. The Blood volume remains the same. Therefore, there MUST be a larger stockpile in the blood to make the LARGER CONVERSION of MORE MOLECULES !!! And as this rate increases, so must the buffer levels. All the testosterone in your body at any second adds up to about a few billionths of a gram.!! Thats the entire load turned over every second. Consider the "every second" RATE will NEVER CHANGE. Therefore to increase from 5 to 7 mgs per day, ones Blood buffer levels MUST go up THE SAME PERCENTAGE AT LEAST.. 2 Mgs looks like a small number, however this equates to a 40% increase. That takes Serum count from 250 to 400 minimum. But the kicker is the SPEED OF THE METABOLISM AT THE MOMENT OF CONVERSION. If a whole day burns as much as 7mgs, consider how slowly this is generated. The process of generating the testosterone at the testicles per say, CAN NOT BE THIS DYNAMIC, at least on a dime. Therefore we have a FURTHER increase in serum counts To BUFFER THE FASTER RATE, and climbing much higher than the 40%. Two factors will mitigate this. Learnined behavior of the physical demand and teaching the body to respond, and two the time it takes to further train SHBG to carry more TT. SHBG is a function of tissue and blood composition which changes ONLY based on your physical composition ...

BACK on track. The notion of the once a month pin does work I think.. However poor injection technique even ONCE can render this ineffective. Hence the pellets I am thinking...
 
Last edited:
Guess typing in blue is supposed to make one seem smarter. I never knew. As fr your diatrobe above, Im quite shaken that I raise your Ire to such a degree. But you are posting your own personal opinions as Fact and stating we should all agree with you. Its fine to have thoughts about new ways of approaching things but, frankly your way of typing can induce migraines in even the most analytical of readers. And im sorry, but 200mg of T enth,cyp per month is a terrible idea. Shutdown will occur you cant just "top up" the HPTA. Plus I hope your not intending to inject all at once, as your estrogen problem which you propose in todays "low t male" will be excacerbated tenfold. Good day sir.
 
The BLUE is my way of separating answers from previous postings. I have not learned the captioning deal as I dont spend my life on forums selling snake oil....

You can listen, but clearly incapable of HEARING.... How in the F%$K is a single injection of TCP going to shut one down WHEN IT CAN NOT EVEN BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE BODY!?!?!?!!!!!! ESTERS............ ESTERS........... DEPOT.............. ESTERS.......... DEPOT.... LaLaLa You are pointless. The best part is that I speculate you ARE a practicing physician.. You are the proof in the one fact I will NEVER REVERSE on. It only takes a memory to be successful in the pursuit of education. This is a MAJOR FAILURE WITH MANY INSTITUTIONS.... TALENT, SKILL, MORALS, and THE ABILITY TO THINK is never given in life. The are both genetic AND LEARNED. You have been failed on BOTH COUNTS... I have said enough. Its all right there.

I only add personality to data I observe. I extrapolate the OBVIOUS and COMMON SENSE. And mostly - I DEBUNK Jackles like yourself....:)

Guess typing in blue is supposed to make one seem smarter. I never knew. As fr your diatrobe above, Im quite shaken that I raise your Ire to such a degree. But you are posting your own personal opinions as Fact and stating we should all agree with you. Its fine to have thoughts about new ways of approaching things but, frankly your way of typing can induce migraines in even the most analytical of readers. And im sorry, but 200mg of T enth,cyp per month is a terrible idea. Shutdown will occur you cant just "top up" the HPTA. Plus I hope your not intending to inject all at once, as your estrogen problem which you propose in todays "low t male" will be excacerbated tenfold. Good day sir.
 
Last edited:
The fact that you think injecting 200mg of T a month at once is a good idea just tells me I should disregard the rest of your innane babble. And fwiw, I am the furthest thing from a doctor. But Ill take it as a complement that I speak in tones that are clearly above your education levels and therefore you label me as something you quite clearly could never be. Enjoy your Coors. Actually, thats probably too highbrow for you. Natural light is more your speed.
 
Last edited:
Only a doc based on you obtuse billigerence. But i am pretty sure you are selling something. Again with the beer. You display a COMPLETE FAILURE to even ingest the dialoge to which you are participating. You dont even take to time to acknowledge a simple avatar.

But you have completely decloaked yourself at this time only revealing an ibecile with a dictionary handy. :popcorn:

The fact that you think injecting 200mg of T a month at once is a good idea just tells me I should disregard the rest of your innane babble. And fwiw, I am the furthest thing from a doctor. But Ill take it as a complement that I speak in tones that are clearly above your education levels and therefore you label me as something you quite clearly could never be. Enjoy your Coors. Actually, thats probably too highbrow for you. Natural light is more your speed.
 
Only with the beer comments again because you have to be drunk. Have to be. And as far as you thinking I would actually take the time to pick words out of a dictionary to quarrel with a lesser such as yourself only indicates to me how far out over your head you are. But again, I appreciate the intimation. So Im a doctor and I type like out of a dictionary. If this is your idea of arguing your doing a right poor job sweetheart. Must be all the excess estrogen from that whalloping 200mg of T you just stuck in your old wrinkled bottom. Tell the misses I said hi.
 
Here's my problem with your theory BBC -

You say the body cannot use all of the testosterone in the bloodstream - right? That most of it is wasted - it's all about the body's demand for testosterone. Right? You (If I'm wrong correct me) believe that TRT does not work because the body cannot use the extra testosterone. Right?

Then why does AAS work for building extra muscle?
 
Yes, I am saying that Estogen factors are NOT the reason TRT fails. I am saying the lack of androgen generating tissue IS. This is a result of Estrogen dominance due to sedentary behavior thus leading to increased body fat, thus leading to estrogen controlling TT production, thus leading to a VICIOUS cycle of the andrgens remaining one step behind one the balance has been swayed...

No, I said the body only needs whatever is short. Which is open to speculation based on the principle. IN LowT males, the issue is tissue prevalance. Estrogen demanding tissues are in place thus evoking the shortage that has contributed to the demise of androgen based tissue (receptors). Its the receptors that determine what testosterone will become. So when trying to restore a middle aged male who has already suffered the end resulting demise of Low T male progression, any excess SynT supplementation above the remaining lacking androgen demands, OR new androgen demands hopefully now being stimulated in the gym, will go to the a) estrogen factors in place which are causing the shutdown in the first place, b) metabolized out unused, or c)cause unneccesary strain/confusion/shutdown by presence there of.

Regaring the usage. No. I said the hormones in the blood will get turned over at an etremely fast rate to any of the above. But yes, how is one going to "use" a TT/FT molecule if there is no where to "park it"... So whats the point in excess dosing?

It is really and truely A MATTER OF TRAINING which is equally influential as Estrogen factors. You can go to the gym and curl barbells once a week and feel good about yourself - but you have done NOTHING. You can go to the gym and work hard to three days per week and you have done more than nothing. You can go to the gym and workout hard and properly with a SPOT, and really put a strain on your muscles thus leading to androgen tissue receptor development. Keep in mind the MOLARITY, or potential density of androgen receptors has GREAT VARIANCE depending on current muscle status and genetic propensity. GREAT VARIANCE indeed. NOW, Go to the gym on a proper workout requiring a spot, with good diet consistently for 2plus years and you have some androgen factors in place that could potentially turn over some serious testosterone...!!!!

The concept of "execise" and training for muscular development is foreign to 99.5 percent of the population, and 70% of those "exercising". The WORK, and DEDICATION that go into muscle development is truely known to few... Lets put it this way. Steroids and GH did not get Vince McMahon of the WWF the body he has today. It was hard work and dedication MOST can not even FATHOM. The man probably has not had a french fire in 15 years.... Most only THINK they are working out - at best... Consider these forum contain MOST or Many of the serious steroid using athletes. Now how many is that considered??? Also note that natural BBs have serious obvious limitations.

In AAS application, you are dealing with someone who has an incredible androgen infrastructure in place. In fact, I speculate that there is no actual shutdown type deficiency in profession BBs, but the simple fact that their body can not naturally support the muscle without exogenous applcation. After all, it takes the extra to get them where they are for a reason. Also when you consider heavy androgen composition and minimal estrogen generating tissue in place, the you are only left with conversion to androgens and waste elimination/shrinkage. There is also some notion I have of receptor domination by presiding presence and presiding conversion propensity controlling by current status. In short, and a body in motion, stays in motion. And Visaversa. The popensity to metabolise testosterone into adrogens is CLEARLY a natural state in men, and thus demonstrated by the androgenic effects when supplemented in young, leaner males. This is also the proof of the negative corrolation of estrogenic metabolism propensity in older obese and sedentary males. Keep in mind we are on the subject of TESTOSTERONE Replacement Theory, and not steroid use. This is a whole different animal in which testosterone is though of as being the GIVEN BASE to other steroids which have better androgenic properties. Hell, even though Dbol is touted as being estrogenic as shit, the propensity for THIS PARTICULAR MOLECULAR STRUCTURE to turn into/behave like androgens, appears greater.

So its not that young male BBs are not "using the testosterone". They are infact metabolizing a much greater amount. This is further proof that SERUM COUNTS MEAN SQUAT. And foremost with regard to TOTAL TESTOSTERONE FIRST. Two factors create variance from the LowT Male here. The younger body with androgen receptors in use, and the lack of body fat and other Estrogen factors that develop we men age. Consider that the difference in 10 million active and androgen receptors and 1 million in a males right arm (for examples sake) per say, may not even be related so directly to size, but functionality, genetic quality, and LEVEL OF USAGE.....:) Now add size (volume and MASS) and consider the number of active androgen receptors.

Testosterone is far from the best steroid for AAS and growing muscle in many. And considered only a solid "foundation" in BB application.. There is no Superman cape in testosterone....

Here's my problem with your theory BBC -

You say the body cannot use all of the testosterone in the bloodstream - right? That most of it is wasted - it's all about the body's demand for testosterone. Right? You (If I'm wrong correct me) believe that TRT does not work because the body cannot use the extra testosterone. Right?

Then why does AAS work for building extra muscle?
 
Last edited:
Lots of back and forth in this thread. Quite simply BBC3 low T in a otherwise healthy male is caused 2 things. Lack of demand "being inactive" and loss of androgen requiring tissue which also lowers demand. Basically all one would have to do is lower body fat and "man-up" start exercising and create a demand for T. As to your very low dosing of T during this recovery, why not just fix diet issues, exercise and manage sluggish energy with nonhormonal means? All this of course for those with secondary hypogonadism. You also said a lot of men don't see success with trt but there clearly are. These men with success either due to genetics or catching the estrogen dominance early go on trt and feel great. I'm typing on my phone and can't see all what I'm typing so ill post more later.
 
I also wanted to comment on the androgen tissue/need. Have any studies on testosterone levels been correlated with fat free mass(muscle tissue). Do those with low T always have a low fat free mass. A lot say that a high body fat lowers T but would a high body fat countered by a high amount of muscle also cause lower T? I would think not.
 
Are you after the fact that - based on the preceeding info, I have left this scenario unexplained in my current hypothesis. Remember first that I am claiming one could potentially carry 250ng/dl or 1000 ng/dl and process the SAME number of TT molecules in one day. This prinicple carries on for derivitive secondary products like E2, however, the accounting is further convoluted by the fact that we dont know the lifespan of E2, if it goes on to again act on other receptors and being formed at and speding time at a generating receptor, if there are varying amounts of time spent interacting with an estrogen generating receptor depedant upon the Type of receptor, what dietary and metabolic co-factors influence elimination (Remember with E2 we have to address elimination more so than production - perhaps). Pehaps the FIFO inventory system is blown all together at the first derivative point and metabolism... Perhaps it does not exist due to variance in hormone activity at different tissues.

Low estrogen and Low T?? So you are referring to SERUM COUNTS?? Well then you have to QUALIFY the measurement. Which is not done in common practice. Again, serum counts can not measure hormones actually metabolized.. Further, its difficult to qualifiy symptoms by many physical characteristics as even with consideration for genetic propensity of receptor population density considered (if it could be), then you would have to consider the genetic propensity for physical attributes as they related to/ellicit tissue growth (muscle, hair, etc - things that are common with great variance in healthy individuals). So really the only way to start is to look at the physical factors most directly related to hormones (the testicles) Are they all they can be? The liver, is it functioning and producing enzymes properly, pituitary and thyroid. ALL MEASURE by SERUM COUNTS which when in turn are considered in relation to others, and the more the merrier, you start to get a picture of possibility. Serum counts CAN be used as a single general indicator, but really only effective certainty achieved once one is COMPLETELY out of range. I DO feel the current TT ranges are not low enought to be used with great certainty in specific contexts of a particular hormone count. So still you must call out a number!:D The 100's range calling out an alarm of sorts exponentiating in Volume as you approach 100. Anything over 200 could be good all day in any country:D...

The long and short is that while consideration of the serum counts of TT as a PRODUCTION hormone, and Estrogen as a DERIVATIVE hormone should be qualified by completely different methods. To attempt to detemine an amount of METABOLIC ACTIVITY by the serum count alone remains IMPOSSIBLE at a glance - for either. So again, serum counts are good "clues" and ANYTHING is NORMAL is good. Realistically and functionally speaking. A TT serum count of 250 is POTENTIALLY EXACTLY THE SAME AS 850. Observed activity as it corrolates however tells us that in many cases there are differences in most cases, and to varying degrees.

I would venture to speculate however, that a TT serum count of 250 is more normal than 850 with consideration of a 40 year old male. That is an obvious NORM. This demonstrates that there is absolutely no way to tell how much is being metabolised, AND TO WHAT....

Further, I harp constantly on DEMAND and PRODUCTION associated. But it is a two-edged sword. Obviously it would seem logical that a deficientcy in elimination, derivative level metabolic activity could create an excess backing up to the top. At least in a short run...

***EPIPHANY ALERT***
Doesnt this all bring a whole new paradigm to light? If clearance is hindered then what does this say about the hormones backed up? Is this when E3 metabolizes to cancer. So if the liver fails, does this cause ROGUE and PERVERTED USED Hormones to convolute the system?!? Cannibalized and only partially interacting? And further remain intact enough to signal proper abundance? Could this be seen under a microscope it so? So could hormone issues actual STEM FROM THE ELIMINATION SIDE?!?! Really, Think about it. There - I have done it again! My Glok is Top - It can't be stopped....:tiphat LOL

So thanks for the "epipfuel".. Sorry if I could not directly address the question better.


I see this thread has continues and I am allowed/challenged to babble like the gospel So I am no doc and this is all for thought process advancement and learning purpose. :o
BBC3. Question. What are your thoughts on someone who has low estrogen and T?
 
You said the same thing twice at the beginning of the paragraph. So I am assuming you were saying 1) Lack of androgen demanding tissue, and 2) Excess estrogen demanding tissue creating metabolism count triggering HPTA production shut down. (and the same can happen due to excess androgens obviously).

MAN UP- YES. But ONE PROBLEM, The excess estrogen is STILL SHUTTING DOWN PRODUCTION simply based on the fact the it is estrogen. So it can be effected by this method, but a long an paintful road indeed. You can imagine the mathmatical curve to success considering the estrogen shutdown still prevailing while you are trying to generate the new androgen demand. Hence the need for that litte extra 2-3 mgs per day (TRT). OBVIOUSLY, if one is to make the transition, the need for exogenous TT lowers, as one has now become HEALTHIER.. Again, Serum counts can not qantify this change...

Lots of back and forth in this thread. Quite simply BBC3 low T in a otherwise healthy male is caused 2 things. Lack of demand "being inactive" and loss of androgen requiring tissue which also lowers demand. Basically all one would have to do is lower body fat and "man-up" start exercising and create a demand for T. As to your very low dosing of T during this recovery, why not just fix diet issues, exercise and manage sluggish energy with nonhormonal means? All this of course for those with secondary hypogonadism. You also said a lot of men don't see success with trt but there clearly are. These men with success either due to genetics or catching the estrogen dominance early go on trt and feel great. I'm typing on my phone and can't see all what I'm typing so ill post more later.
 
Again this is an area where serum counts fail. IN healthy males I will guarantee that low TT corrolates with high body fat. I would speculate even if some muscle contents is maintained and futher procreated. Again to all the question. Serum count failures for these purposes.

I have proposed in the past and will say it again. The human body is a demand based machine that feeds back upon its self. Life is a Zero Sum Game. This means we are dwindling down to nothing. I speculation that once we leace the HORMONAL CHAOS stage, or puberty, it is the beginning a DRAMATIC refinement of hormonal and other activity. There should be no further NATURAL and unaccounted hormonal cascades. So we Fine tune. And by that I MAKE NO INDICATION OF A REDUCTION OF ACTURAL HORMONE RATES, But only the measure of the BLOOD BUFFER LEVELS or Serum counts. I suspect that once we refine to a certain level, we can not get back an excess ( my poppycock) as we have expedited further end tuning. But I just said this means NOTHING. I also speculate that the only adults who retain high serum counts of TT are those who remain healthy, active, and with minimal accptable fat levels - BUT IN CONSTANT HEALTHY FLUCTUATION of MINIMAL VARIANCE IMPORTANTLY with regard to BOTH fat and muscle. OR, those who do not take a certain position for an extended period. (Obviously the FAT position is easier to achieve and maintain.) Thus the body is kept "confused" and can not further the refinement process as readily. You have to consider a predominance of adrogens above normal rates wil shut he HPTA down just as fast as high estrogen rates. I have further speculated that Androgen related shutdown is more severe than estrogen related shutdown when considering testicular health and size (more of my own brand). I would also say while estrogen related shut down APPEARS less severe in the physical indications at the testicles, it is more of a long term issue thus summing equal significance and more realized negative effects as a cumulative monster. You can certainly imagine how the excess androgen scenario is self resolving.:rolleyes: EITHER CASE IS INSTANTLY RECOVERABLE TO CURRENT TISSUE REQUIREMENTS at least for the puposes of health. This is the feedback loop and I speculate faster than thought. Androgen suppressed testicles that have turned to peanuts will return to normal size with each day that passes and levels lower. You can actually almost see them grow when returning from a shinking of that magnitude. This is further proof of androgen shutdown as one can directly equate testicle shrinkage with Potency rather than estrogen. For BBs it does not appear that shutdown ever was the chicken, but the androgen egg laid.... There can be no real delay in HPTA response, only a failure to measure hormone metabolism rates accurately via serum counts. The androgen scenario however is NOT naturally recoverable as it was an unnatural state supported by exogenous supply. Consider estrogen principles are unnatural in men and can be removed. EXTREMELY HIGH ANDROGEN POPULATION can not be supported naturally, so is there even an extended shut down in BB's?!?.

With regard to the activity of E's and A's.... In short, I like the A/C at 68 degrees so Dress up. Anyone can insulate themselves for a high degree of cold(fix for estrogen excess via fat removal), but you can only strip off so much clothing (no fix for androgen deficiency related to excess muscle).

YOUR ANSWER. I think the question got muddled a bit or its a bit hard to read, but I get it.. Actually BB;s have doc's lower TT levels. What does it mean.. nothing. Serum counts again... I speculate anyone who has carried high levels of A or E receptors, OR skewed to one side of the other for too long, has experience further "refinement of serum buffer levels"..

OK I am full of myself now. Sorry I skewed off its too late.. Hope I could provide some fuel for though..

I also wanted to comment on the androgen tissue/need. Have any studies on testosterone levels been correlated with fat free mass(muscle tissue). Do those with low T always have a low fat free mass. A lot say that a high body fat lowers T but would a high body fat countered by a high amount of muscle also cause lower T? I would think not.
 
Back
Top