supralevels
New Member
Conspiracy theory, are they all the same labs?
Obviously not serious. Perhaps they have the same powder source and got a bad batch..
Yeah it seems when a source has a bad batch. The other ones have it also. Coincidence
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Conspiracy theory, are they all the same labs?
Obviously not serious. Perhaps they have the same powder source and got a bad batch..
Flenser - did labmax comment on the concentration levels in the PEP or Bio samples?
This was the result of GC/MS testing. There's no question of the results. There were no concentration tests done, though. His comments on concentration I posted in Astro's thread are not quantitative as he's not setup for that yet.
Flenser - did labmax comment on the concentration levels in the PEP or Bio samples?
Yes I seen these results for the Mast E and I know I sent Flesner what I believed to be Mast P instead of mast E due to lables being so similar. I made this error public in this thread about 3 months back and it only happend to 2 people and surly wont happen again and if that's the case then my suspicion has been confirmed
I will pull my Mast E until I get further testing but I know that the lab max tests have shown Mast e to look like Deca even when mass spec shows it to be mast p? This is concerning to me and may defInitely be a flaw then again I may be wrong but why would it show up as deca when it was mast? I will brew another fresh batch and even next day mail it to someone if the have a lab max now. TODAY!! ASAP CONTACT ME.
I will replace anyone's Mast E as long as proof is shown. And please dont lie I have a very good idea of who bought what. I will get to the bottom of this I assure everyone.
I will try and contact the guys who previously ran mass specs for me son I van get a Mass Spec ran on my Mast E.
Yes I seen these results for the Mast E and I know I sent Flesner what I believed to be Mast P instead of mast E due to lables being so similar. I made this error public in this thread about 3 months back and it only happend to 2 people and surly wont happen again and if that's the case then my suspicion has been confirmed
I will pull my Mast E until I get further testing but I know that the lab max tests have shown Mast e to look like Deca even when mass spec shows it to be mast p? This is concerning to me and may defInitely be a flaw then again I may be wrong but why would it show up as deca when it was mast? I will brew another fresh batch and even next day mail it to someone if the have a lab max now. TODAY!! ASAP CONTACT ME.
I will replace anyone's Mast E as long as proof is shown. And please dont lie I have a very good idea of who bought what. I will get to the bottom of this I assure everyone.
I will try and contact the guys who previously ran mass specs for me son I van get a Mass Spec ran on my Mast E.
So if you have astro mast e you can't, with a right mind, pin?? Another scammer??
Throwing the word scammer around isn't cool. Not defending him but defending you using that word for a source with 1 bad test that if you read is trying to make it right. Not cool.
Exactly. Not saying it's a scam at all. I just heard some things about the Mast E and I wanted to clarify with the test. We just need to have the Mast E tested- I can do it if someone can point me to where to test it. I don't mind spending the money to authenticate gear. Money isn't the issue for me, legit gear is.
No - the lab needs legit mast e first to create the test. The samples sent where tested (GC/MS) and came back as mast p (Astro's a mix of things).
So, Astro's raw "mast e" source likely isn't giving him mast e, it seems?
