AASraw: Independent Lab Test Reports & COA/HPLC

[SuperJew]

Curious if this is old stock from before all the "Crack downs" or what. Curious how they can manufacture 98% DHT but only 90% TC.

I suspect (and I have no direct knowledge) that many chemists were indeed jailed during the crackdown. I believe we might be seeing university students who have been lured in by big money, doing the manufacturing now. They're almost learning on the job. Some compounds turn out good, others not so much. Some batches higher purity, some batches they forgot a thing or two.

 

[hcgfiend123456]

I suspect (and I have no direct knowledge) that many chemists were indeed jailed during the crackdown. I believe we might be seeing university students who have been lured in by big money, doing the manufacturing now. They're almost learning on the job. Some compounds turn out good, others not so much. Some batches higher purity, some batches they forgot a thing or two.

You think so? I picture very good chemists chained up in underground labs and turned into slaves. Working in awful conditions. Forced by the CCP to make them products that sell and all the money gets funneled to Xi. And than when the US puts any pressure on them they have "arrests" for show. Meanwhile quality goes down. Prices go up. Than there next patsy comes along. Maybe I need to take my tinfoil hat off.

 

[SuperJew]

You think so? I picture very good chemists chained up in underground labs and turned into slaves. Working in awful conditions. Forced by the CCP to make them products that sell and all the money gets funneled to Xi. And than when the US puts any pressure on them they have "arrests" for show. Meanwhile quality goes down. Prices go up. Than there next patsy comes along. Maybe I need to take my tinfoil hat off.

I mean, I'm no expert in Chinese politics. I did spend some time there in the 2000's and had a great experience. Very clean, very peaceful and cheap AF. Though I definitely wasn't planning to roam the streets saying controversial things.

 

[hcgfiend123456]

I mean, I'm no expert in Chinese politics. I did spend some time there in the 2000's and had a great experience. Very clean, very peaceful and cheap AF. Though I definitely wasn't planning to roam the streets saying controversial things.

I have an active imagination!

 

[Spirrevipp]

 

[athlon]

nice

 

[SuperJew]

Well, we've established that they're really good at hitting the 90% mark.

 

[Ducati0n]

View attachment 378025

Thank u for sharing

 

[Photon]

View attachment 378025

Is this a new batch?
We know Accutane degrades pretty quick.

This is 3 year old raws (Not sure bought from where tho)....

Post in thread 'Isotretinoin powder'

Jan 31, 2026

Unfortunately, I didn't test it when I received it...

Here's the result after 3 years vacuum-sealed in the refrigerator.

I don't think the purity was that much better when I received it than it is now.

Therefore, I don't believe in rapid degradation if it is vacuum-sealed and stored in a cool, dark place.

• TyLu17

• 

 

[Spirrevipp]

Yes, New batch recived from aasraws januar 18

 

[Scooby69]

Hi everyone,

Attached are test results from 4 raws from AASraw that I have purchased over the past few months.

AASP-001: Testosterone propionate (date of shipment 2025-10-31)
AASP-002: TNE (date of shipment 2025-11-13)
AASP-003: Testosterone cypionate (date of shipment 2025-11-13)
AASP-004: MENT (date of shipment 2025-12-19)



As an experiment, I also processed a small portion of these raws in a vacuum oven (30 torr) at 65 deg C for 20 h. Attached are test results of those samples processed in the vacuum oven. Also attached is a pic of the raws (upper row: 3 and 4, lower row: 1 and 2). The test cyp and TNE lost about 1% weight after the vacuum oven. The test P and MENT had essentially no change in weight after the vacuum oven.



There is no improvement in purity after the vacuum oven and perhaps a slight decrease. So, no clear benefit there. At the very least I can be pretty confident in the purity data since I essentially have a duplicate for each sample.

 

[AASraw]

Hi everyone,

Attached are test results from 4 raws from AASraw that I have purchased over the past few months.

AASP-001: Testosterone propionate (date of shipment 2025-10-31)
AASP-002: TNE (date of shipment 2025-11-13)
AASP-003: Testosterone cypionate (date of shipment 2025-11-13)
AASP-004: MENT (date of shipment 2025-12-19)

View attachment 378615View attachment 378616View attachment 378617View attachment 378618

As an experiment, I also processed a small portion of these raws in a vacuum oven (30 torr) at 65 deg C for 20 h. Attached are test results of those samples processed in the vacuum oven. Also attached is a pic of the raws (upper row: 3 and 4, lower row: 1 and 2). The test cyp and TNE lost about 1% weight after the vacuum oven. The test P and MENT had essentially no change in weight after the vacuum oven.

View attachment 378619View attachment 378620View attachment 378621View attachment 378622View attachment 378623

There is no improvement in purity after the vacuum oven and perhaps a slight decrease. So, no clear benefit there. At the very least I can be pretty confident in the purity data since I essentially have a duplicate for each sample.

Thank you for your efforts by doing these reports. No matter the results are poor or good, we can see you throw your time, money and cares on them. It is not easy to do so.

 

[Photon]

Hi everyone,

Attached are test results from 4 raws from AASraw that I have purchased over the past few months.

AASP-001: Testosterone propionate (date of shipment 2025-10-31)
AASP-002: TNE (date of shipment 2025-11-13)
AASP-003: Testosterone cypionate (date of shipment 2025-11-13)
AASP-004: MENT (date of shipment 2025-12-19)

View attachment 378615View attachment 378616View attachment 378617View attachment 378618

As an experiment, I also processed a small portion of these raws in a vacuum oven (30 torr) at 65 deg C for 20 h. Attached are test results of those samples processed in the vacuum oven. Also attached is a pic of the raws (upper row: 3 and 4, lower row: 1 and 2). The test cyp and TNE lost about 1% weight after the vacuum oven. The test P and MENT had essentially no change in weight after the vacuum oven.

View attachment 378619View attachment 378620View attachment 378621View attachment 378622View attachment 378623

There is no improvement in purity after the vacuum oven and perhaps a slight decrease. So, no clear benefit there. At the very least I can be pretty confident in the purity data since I essentially have a duplicate for each sample.

Very impressive results, you hit the jackpot.
My TNE shipped 11/19 and was 83%, so 1 week after yours. 3-4 people who ordered within the week or two of me received 87%.

Same for the rest of the results you got, majority of the people here received a much lower purity..very strange.

Alot of TC reports ~90% and Trest coming back at 88%.

Please share your secrets. Do you buy candy for your rep? What candy does she like?

(On a more serious note, do you mix the raws first before taking a sample? Or do you sample from various parts of it? Top middle etc?)

 

[Scooby69]

Very impressive results, you hit the jackpot.
My TNE shipped 11/19 and was 83%, so 1 week after yours. 3-4 people who ordered within the week or two of me received 87%.

Same for the rest of the results you got, majority of the people here received a much lower purity..very strange.

Alot of TC reports ~90% and Trest coming back at 88%.

Please share your secrets. Do you buy candy for your rep? What candy does she like?

(On a more serious note, do you mix the raws first before taking a sample? Or do you sample from various parts of it? Top middle etc?)

I was thinking I should buy a lottery ticket after these results! Was particularly happy about the trest results.

I did mix the raws, but not in a systamatic way. The first thing I do is break down the shipment into more manageable quantities and vacuum seal with an oxygen absorber and a desiccant pack for storage. So there is some mixing going on as I scoop and aliquot. But again, I didn't consciously mix for sampling purposes.