sp5der - QUALITY US DOMESTIC

Someone actually emailed me and sent me some examples today of vendors tests coming back low, that was crashed in jano possession. And said it looks like they test them crashed sometimes.

Anyway mine not tested yet, so I mailed and asked them to warm up and get back into solution, if it crashed.

Because the TNE is definitely going to be crashed.

I’m not sure if they will warm it and get the message in time but i tried and I hope they do. Their representative has informed me the lab has been notified to uncrash the solution …

It is completely retarded to test a crashed solution, if they really do it... No comment

I've learned two things lately:

1) mix the shit out of your gear before sending a sample to be tested (oils and raws)

2) if it's an oil, might be prudent to include a note in your email for them to make sure it isn't crashed before testing
 
Oh
I use the hottest on my mug warmer before every pin. Around 180f? I don't remember
The labels for the b series direct thermal niimbots are typically rated to 140f which makes sense you are seeing the labels turn black. The labels are heat sensitive as designed.

The m series thermal transfer I believe are rated to 250f so that would likely solve the problem for you if wanted. More expensive though.
 
It's just poor synthesis.
Unfortunately we've seen the same thing, even during the times when raws were plentiful, cheap and easily accessible.
Could you elaborate on this more, please?

I thought it was good to go, but after reading the AASRaw thread, am a bit concerned.


yes btw

that peak 3 on the first test you send me dosent look like a miss id

all the ions add up for a tosyl group, it might be wrong name for compound but its definetly a tosyl group aka muscle death, hepatic stress, not studied in humans. no bueno

Is the product of the poor synthesis a major inflammatory agent or something that causes cancer, aids, etc.

@janoshik , can you provide any insights here.

Thank you.
 
So it is good to go based on your knowledge of GCMS (No major red flags)?
it dosent make sense and probably why jano dont wanna comment.

0.2% + miss id so the software just named it to the closest thing in its database

gcms in oils to find somthing in the dissolved steroids is a funny idea xd

ideally gcms in raws where we found stuff which we were talking about.

gcms in oils should purely be for identification of oils unless it says 10-20% area+ horse shit in there

that gcms test is useless since we know what oil is used already
 
it dosent make sense and probably why jano dont wanna comment.

0.2% + miss id so the software just named it to the closest thing in its database

gcms in oils to find somthing in the dissolved steroids is a funny idea xd

ideally gcms in raws where we found stuff which we were talking about.

gcms in oils should purely be for identification of oils unless it says 10-20% area+ horse shit in there

that gcms test is useless since we know what oil is used already
Got it, thank you. Happy to confirm no horse shit in sp5's fine quality product.
 
Got it, thank you. Happy to confirm no horse shit in sp5's fine quality product.
just get gcms in raws.

gcms in oils get obfuscated by the large amount of oils.

so does hplc but we cant see the different compounds other than the steroid tested for.

i feel like im derailing this thread i really dont care about sp5der when talking about this no attacks to him since we all have the same raws. he seems like a nice autistic guy doing his thing
 

here if you wanna catch up on it, me and photons consensous come from this so far.
 
Back
Top