GH forehead growth

Do you do this? I was already wondering about trying to subtly reduce my glabellar lines as i look angry/stressed all the time (which i probably am at work to be fair!)...
i was joking, but the thought crossed my mind that minoxidil increases the blood flow to that specific area when applied topically so there is some sort of precedent. Increasing blood flow/increasing nutrients into the muscle. I'm suprised nobody is making a cocktail of BCAAs for site injection with all the other blends ie. super shred, immune enhancement, lipo-c ect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JK1
i was joking, but the thought crossed my mind that minoxidil increases the blood flow to that specific area when applied topically so there is some sort of precedent. Increasing blood flow/increasing nutrients into the muscle. I'm suprised nobody is making a cocktail of BCAAs for site injection with all the other blends ie. super shred, immune enhancement, lipo-c ect.
Ha I'm sorry I had to check back i accidentally quoted your calfs comment - knew you were joking!

I was asking the other guy if he botoxes his glabellars

To anybody who actually thinks of trying to apply topical min anywhere like there legs ( cant underestimate what some will try) i beleive its exceptionally toxic to dogs and cats, even tiny amounts.
.
 
TLDR

-Minoxidil makes cells more sensitive to IGF-1 growth promoting effects.

Makes sense. Along with the gh I started taking 5mg oral minoxidil. After that I started to develop acne in the scalp back of my neck, some also in the crown area. I attributed that to my barber, which I then switch barbers and it still got worse. My dermatologist diagnosed it as acne keloidalis nuchae. I probably developed cvg at the same time.
 
Makes sense. Along with the gh I started taking 5mg oral minoxidil. After that I started to develop acne in the scalp back of my neck, some also in the crown area. I attributed that to my barber, which I then switch barbers and it still got worse. My dermatologist diagnosed it as acne keloidalis nuchae. I probably developed cvg at the same time.
What was your thinking on your barber being the culprit?
 
Maybe it's just me but I'm not seeing a bunch of difference here. They thoughtfully used a final picture where he is a little closer to the camera making his face look bigger and his face isn't tilted like it is in every other photo. And he also grew a beard so you can't tell shit about his jaw line anymore.

Old peoples' noses and ears keep growing, my grand dad definitely wasn't taking GH but his nose looked completely different at 70 than it did at 50-60.
 
Maybe it's just me but I'm not seeing a bunch of difference here. They thoughtfully used a final picture where he is a little closer to the camera making his face look bigger and his face isn't tilted like it is in every other photo. And he also grew a beard so you can't tell shit about his jaw line anymore.

Old peoples' noses and ears keep growing, my grand dad definitely wasn't taking GH but his nose looked completely different at 70 than it did at 50-60.

That’s a form of age related localized “acromegaly light”.

IGF-1 goes down with age, IGF-1 receptors in muscle, for instance, decline (because of declining androgen levels btw), causing the typical age related muscle loss (sarcopenia).

With less exposure to IGF-1, the remaining receptors try to compensate by increasing sensitivity.

IGF binding proteins decline with age (also, in part, as a result of declining androgens) leaving more of the declining IGF-1 free to bind to receptors.

But in tissues like nose cartilage, IGF-1 receptors levels aren’t influenced by declining androgen hormones, so they don’t disappear like they do in muscle. Since they’re also exposed to lower average levels of IGF-1, they upregulate sensitivity, get saturated by the additional “free” IGF-1 not tied up in binding proteins, with the end result being faster growth than when they were young.

TRT and (physiological levels of) rHGH would actually slow or stop this “old age localized nose acromegaly”.
 
Stallone's transformation is because of plastic surgery stretching his facial fascia more and mover towards his ears. I don't think that's acromegaly.

Meaning, his face is getting pulled tighter and tighter back towards his ears. They they add fillers making it thicker.
Said something similar a long time ago, but agenda needs to agend :p :p
 
Really interesting...and concerning. Not sure why someone would use oral minoxidil 50mg, unless its an only option for BP?

For MBP isn't the typical dose 2.5-5mg.

I wonder what the basic mechanism is for oral minoxidil potentiating IGF-1 effect.

That last paragraph in the exert, i would maybe need to read more understand, but the prior info states that oral min caused this and it potentiates IGF-1 effects... then 'meanwhile' ...'excessive IGF-1 production by the liver in response to GH'. So, is this saying that the minoxidil also caused excessive production of IGF-1 via HGH. Is potentiating IGF-1s effects the same as causing it's excessive production?
*....His medical history was notable for coronary artery disease status aftercoronary artery bypass graft of 3 vessels, peripheralvascular disease status after a right femoropopitealbypass, and severe hypertension. His medicationsincluded minoxidil 50 mg daily, labetalol 400 mgdaily, furosemide 320 mg daily, potassium 80 mEq daily, quinapril 20 mg daily, spironolactone 100 mgdaily, simvastatin 40 mg daily, lansoprazole 30 mgdaily, and aspirin 81 mg twice a week..."

....However, IGF-1 and GH levels along with radiographs of the chest and long bones (femora and humeri) were all normal....
 
  • Like
Reactions: JK1
Said something similar a long time ago, but agenda needs to agend :p :p

Look, without first hand knowledge, what caused his current look is guesswork.

But we know he used rHGH many years ago, because he got busted and went on to not only acknowledge it, but even recently endorsed it in interviews.

The thing is, he’s said some shit that makes it pretty clear he didn’t know what he was doing, and likely following the common advice of using “As much as you can afford.”, which for him, meant a lot more than even most bodybuilders.

He keeps making the point was that although he used it to “get buff”, HGH wasn’t a steroid, and he denied using steroids.

So how much rHGH do you have to use to get an appreciable anabolic boost? A fuckload,

Whether his use was guided by IGF-1 levels (yeah right) or “More is better” there are old timers with an “agenda” that want to hang on to the old “as much as you can afford” philosophy now that its so cheap they can afford to use it at “millionaire” doses indefinitely, denying any harm can come from excessive rHGH use.

My point is simply that for the first time in history, it’s easy for virtually anyone to use as much GH as they want, indefinitely, and unless risk is managed somehow (like watching IGF), there are health risks that will become more apparent over time with more people using it.

Without the narrative being updated to include some consciousness of that risk and how to control it, all irresponsible use will lead to is even tighter regulations and more crackdowns in the future.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JK1
*....His medical history was notable for coronary artery disease status aftercoronary artery bypass graft of 3 vessels, peripheralvascular disease status after a right femoropopitealbypass, and severe hypertension. His medicationsincluded minoxidil 50 mg daily, labetalol 400 mgdaily, furosemide 320 mg daily, potassium 80 mEq daily, quinapril 20 mg daily, spironolactone 100 mgdaily, simvastatin 40 mg daily, lansoprazole 30 mgdaily, and aspirin 81 mg twice a week..."

....However, IGF-1 and GH levels along with radiographs of the chest and long bones (femora and humeri) were all normal....


Forget about him as an example.

Do you doubt that supra-physiological levels of IGF-1 over time cause acromegaly?

We know how to manage most risk from AAS, what markers to watch, control, and adjust doses by.

What, if anything, guides safe rHGH use, especially now that cost no longer constrains its use.
 
Look, without first hand knowledge, what caused his current look is guesswork.

But we know he used rHGH many years ago, because he got busted and went on to not only acknowledge it, but even recently endorsed it in interviews.

The thing is, he’s said some shit that makes it pretty clear he didn’t know what he was doing, and likely following the common advice of using “As much as you can afford.”, which for him, meant a lot more than even most bodybuilders.

He keeps making the point was that although he used it to “get buff”, HGH wasn’t a steroid, and he denied using steroids.

So how much rHGH do you have to use to get an appreciable anabolic boost? A fuckload,

Whether his use was guided by IGF-1 levels (yeah right) or “More is better” there are old timers with an “agenda” that want to hang on to the old “as much as you can afford” philosophy now that its so cheap they can afford to use it at “millionaire” doses indefinitely, denying any harm can come from excessive rHGH use.

My point is simply that for the first time in history, it’s easy for virtually anyone to use as much GH as they want, indefinitely, and unless risk is managed somehow (like watching IGF), there are health risks that will become more apparent over time with more people using it.

Without the narrative being updated to include some consciousness of that risk and how to control it, all irresponsible use will lead to is even tighter regulations and more crackdowns in the futures
You have an agenda that is not backed by real word incidence or prevalence. I said it before and i will say it again.
Just got tired of arguing with you.
The principle remains Common things occur commonly.
You go about dragging clinical reports of cases with rare occurrences and posit them here as if it's sole unshakable Lore.
It's tiring but has zero bearing on harm reduction (i e , it's not making anyone unsafe) hence my reluctance to drag what is essentially an academic debate
 
Last edited:
Forget about him as an example.

Do you doubt that supra-physiological levels of IGF-1 over time cause acromegaly?
It's hard to forget about him when you used the image to bolster what is still unfolding science.
Bruh if you want to 'educate the bros' about Minoxidil and it's effects use this article instead

It posits several theories about how minoxidil interacts with receptors to produce its effects.
.
 
I dont see much of a change besides that guys droopy eye lids??? I mean he’s 60 too.

My IGF was 165. I only “feel” GH when my body fat and estrogen is high. That’s when I get the carpal tunnel and when I got fat (15-16%) it’s the one time I got pitting edema in both ankles so I dropped the GH, it went away, then restarted from 2iu and worked back up as my body fat dropped. I know my source is legit, 36iu vials.

I’ll work on some pics for your entertainment lol
what source?
 
Do you do this? I was already wondering about trying to subtly reduce my glabellar lines as i look angry/stressed all the time (which i probably am at work to be fair!)...
Yes i had deep 11 lines and now they are GONE! Botox (or other toxin) to paralyze and atrophy the muscle. This also stops the lines from getting worse. Then I had PDO threads put in. It`s dissolvable surgical suture that stimulates collagen growth to "fill in" those 11 lines. We do it in our clinic for $160. You in AZ?
 
Yes i had deep 11 lines and now they are GONE! Botox (or other toxin) to paralyze and atrophy the muscle. This also stops the lines from getting worse. Then I had PDO threads put in. It`s dissolvable surgical suture that stimulates collagen growth to "fill in" those 11 lines. We do it in our clinic for $160. You in AZ?
No unfortunately, not US. Interesting though thanks. PDO sounds next level.

I've now had botox. Massive difference. No longer look so stressed.
 
Back
Top