MESO-Rx Sponsor STANFORD PHARMA PUBLIC SALE 10/24/21

Well said, no one has ever been questioned if it was a 1ml sample or a sample of the entire vial.

I have tested Stan’s primo on four different occasions over the years, which all can be found here on the board. Each sample was 1ml and never once was I questioned. The day I am I’ll say fuck it and no longer share my reports on Meso. I test things for myself and my clients and while doing so I share those reports with the community. If my character ever comes into play for contributing to harm reduction I’ll just stop. This is what has got me active in this thread this morning as I’m sure many of you are like myself and I would hate to see less folks testing things and sharing those test. We should not discourage or discredit a member’s testing. Especially not just because y'all have placed a source on a pedestal. Do we take the test result as gospel, no now we send in a full vial and see how wide spread this is and start asking questions.

@accidentaljedi173 maybe you said this already but when did you purchase this batch?
I ordered around February
 
I'm not treating you or your test like anything. Thanks for sharing, I'm glad you're checking your gear. I did think the response to @RockyP 's points was odd though, and I was giving my 2¢ that actually, he's right.

Your test also carries the baggage of being part of Project Clear Gear, clearly meant for the community. Any community project should know people would question a 1ml sample.
Torch me if I'm wrong, but I've never seen anyone make a fuss about whether the sample is 1ml or full vial.
 
Thanks for sharing the test. At first, I thought it was Test C 200 mg and figured mistakes happen, but if it’s actually 250 mg, that’s a different story. I don’t quite get why @RockyP reacting so aggressively toward @accidentaljedi173, the guy’s been solid, never seen him shilling or doing anything shady.

Even the best can make mistakes sometimes, and I’m sure Stan will handle things properly in this situation.
 
Thanks for sharing the test. At first, I thought it was Test C 200 mg and figured mistakes happen, but if it’s actually 250 mg, that’s a different story. I don’t quite get why @RockyP reacting so aggressively toward @accidentaljedi173, the guy’s been solid, never seen him shilling or doing anything shady.

Even the best can make mistakes sometimes, and I’m sure Stan will handle things properly in this situation.
I’ve been trying to figure out why it’s so hard to send the full vial to ensure transparency. There’s another vendor thread where this was done. Everyone was raking Primal over the coals to ensure that they sent full vials for testing. I’m trying hard to understand. I haven’t come up with anything yet. Pls let me know if you can figure it out. Forgive me for not taking the word of an anonymous internet bro sending 1 cc of oil.
 
I’ve been trying to figure out why it’s so hard to send the full vial to ensure transparency. There’s another vendor thread where this was done. Everyone was raking Primal over the coals to ensure that they sent full vials for testing. I’m trying hard to understand. I haven’t come up with anything yet. Pls let me know if you can figure it out. Forgive me for not taking the word of an anonymous internet bro sending 1 cc of oil.
Could be a security and consistency thing. Sending a full vial raises the risk of leaks, tampering, or label swaps during shipping, and it looks a lot more suspicious to carriers than a small sterile sample. Pulling 1 cc from the same vial you use is still representative of that batch and is easier and safer to send.

Might sound a bit conspiracy-ish, but imagine this scenario just as a thought experiment. He sends a full vial to Jano, Jano tests it and reports underdosed. If Jano happens to be on good terms with Stan, there is an easy line of communication by email about the result and how to handle it. I am not saying that happened, just that those are the kinds of things my brain jumps to when transparency is unclear.
 
Could be a security and consistency thing. Sending a full vial raises the risk of leaks, tampering, or label swaps during shipping, and it looks a lot more suspicious to carriers than a small sterile sample. Pulling 1 cc from the same vial you use is still representative of that batch and is easier and safer to send.

Might sound a bit conspiracy-ish, but imagine this scenario just as a thought experiment. He sends a full vial to Jano, Jano tests it and reports underdosed. If Jano happens to be on good terms with Stan, there is an easy line of communication by email about the result and how to handle it. I am not saying that happened, just that those are the kinds of things my brain jumps to when transparency is unclear.
I agree. Anything is possible. No good deed goes unpunished these days. Hopefully this can be resolved quickly either way
 
Why are we treating this test is that manner? It's questioned that I for some reason, through a testing group, provided a sample with ill intention towards Stan?

So if this test was spot on and I shared it, would you question the legitimacy or care that I sent a full vial or just 1ml?

You guys seem to overlook the fact that this is from my personal stuff. I'm pinning this test, with the assumption that it was in line with other tests that have been provided. Should I question the legitimacy of the tests that I looked at that made me comfortable in buying the test?

Thank you for testing and actually being willing to post it.

Positing negative reports, in most cases, always ends up with negative repercussions for the poster (getting attached, unnecessary arguments etc) that, on many occasions i have reconsidered just moving on and calling it a day..

I'd only be guessing. It's possible.

The raw quality would have to be so bad that i'd even question why was it even used to brew..
 
@accidentaljedi173 definitely doesn’t seem like a guy to fake testing.

It’s weird how now members tend to back sources before other members testing on their own dime.
I think it’s because they’ve bought a bunch of gear from the source, and are in denial that they’re potentially sitting on a bunch of underdosed gear. It’s a shitty thought, but Stan’s a good dude, and I don’t doubt he’ll make it right. This happened recently with a damn good source on another board I buy from, and the source replaced every person’s gear that had bought while that batch was going out.
 
Back
Top