MESO-Rx Sponsor Opti USA DOMESTIC - HGH, INJECTABLES, TABLETS, PEPTIDES, & MISC

Guys, don't sleep on this Gold Top sale. Probably the best deal out there right now for high quality domestic GH. ~7 hours left, and he's got about 50 in stock at the moment.
Pretty good deal honestly, $0.56 an IU. I grabbed 5. 4000 ius in the fridge now. Along with 1000ML test and 600ML npp, I think Im good for a while lol
China is 0.40 iu but the two sources I looked at had too much dimmer for my liking.
 
Pretty good deal honestly, $0.56 an IU. I grabbed 5. 4000 ius in the fridge now. Along with 1000ML test and 600ML npp, I think Im good for a while lol
China is 0.40 iu but the two sources I looked at had too much dimmer for my liking.
Good to see some solid numbers such as yours. It's smart to be prepared, now more than ever, as the future is far from certain.
 
Good to see some solid numbers such as yours. It's smart to be prepared, now more than ever, as the future is far from certain.
Bunker Stash Bois
Arnold Schwarzenegger Handshake GIF
 
If you lower your testosterone down to more like 110-120mg/wk, you may not need to add yet another drug to control e2.
True, but not in the not too distant future when I dial everything in and get my body used to the current levels I plan on increasing the test dose and introducing another compound and do a mini blast.
 
True, but not in the not too distant future when I dial everything in and get my body used to the current levels I plan on increasing the test dose and introducing another compound and do a mini blast.
All the more reason to run less now (less test and no added AI). Dialing anything in now will not matter once you increase the test dose.

Just my two cents.
 
All the more reason to run less now (less test and no added AI). Dialing anything in now will not matter once you increase the test dose.

Just my two cents.
100% - If someone's real TRT with no AI is 120 mg / week, who cares. They can still blast with whatever test dosage they want and use EQ / Primo (or an AI) to help with E2. I think running AI / primo / EQ on a normal, "real" (within normal physiological range) TRT is silly.
 
I don’t use hgh but should I grab a kit to spot inject lagging muscles or not unless consistently on
It's debatable if spot injections of GH do anything at all to promote site growth, and if they do, it's minimal and takes a very long time. I don't personally believe it does, nor do I believe that it causes hyperplasia.
 
The site injection for growth doesn't even make sense on paper. It doesn't matter where the GH is pinned, the IGF-1 is what causes the growth, and that conversion from GH to IGF-1 needs to happen in the liver, meaning you cna inject it anywhere and the growth benefits still need to come after that GH is carried to the liver to be converted to IGF-1. That stated, site injections of GH for fat loss are a real thing, as I've learned accidentally by not moving my GH shot locations around enough and getting small divots (from lipolysis) in areas that were pinned too frequently. Whether or not site injections of IGF-1 are helpful for growth is debatable but also not terribly likely in any measurable amount, else we would have heard about it a long long time ago.

The X factor here is also genetics. Why do we have some bodyparts that are bigger / more vascular / more responsive to training than others? There's a multitude of reasons, but one is that IGF-1 receptors are not distributed evenly throughout the musculature. So even if you think you are hacking the body with GH / IGF-1 injection timing / site pinning, you likely are not. Just take the GH, train hard, eat properly, and recover. The rest is pre-ordained genetically.
 
How do you guys feel about site-specific growth with injections of IGF-1 and IGF variants? That Pangolin dude had a thread a few weeks ago about it but no one ever linked any useful data. I honestly never gave much credence to the spot injection theories, for anything really, even BPC.
IGF-1, particularly IGF-1 DES, does seem to show some promise as a site enhancement compound, but I've not looked into it enough to speak with any confidence about it.
 
How do you guys feel about site-specific growth with injections of IGF-1 and IGF variants? That Pangolin dude had a thread a few weeks ago about it but no one ever linked any useful data. I honestly never gave much credence to the spot injection theories, for anything really, even BPC.
I’m not a believer in site-specific growth. 99% of the things we inject are systemic so they affect the entire body.

There is a chance inflammation at the injection area causes more bloodflow locally and may heal that area faster. Maybe this is why BPC/TB helps more near the injury, but I’d have to see hard data to believe it.
 
IGF-1, particularly IGF-1 DES, does seem to show some promise as a site enhancement compound, but I've not looked into it enough to speak with any confidence about it.
I'm sitting on some LR3 my buddy was gonna toss, but I don't have room in the cycle schedule for a few months. Perhaps I'll play with it and report back. I'm evenly proportionate already imo, what should I target for the experiment? Ooh, maybe I'll go lopsided and do one delt and one glute. Or one arm like that guy from the Shyamalamadingdong Lady in the Water movie.

MV5BMTI5NTUwMjIwMl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNzE4NzkyMw@@._V1_.jpg
 
I'm sitting on some LR3 my buddy was gonna toss, but I don't have room in the cycle schedule for a few months. Perhaps I'll play with it and report back. I'm evenly proportionate already imo, what should I target for the experiment? Ooh, maybe I'll go lopsided and do one delt and one glute. Or one arm like that guy from the Shyamalamadingdong Lady in the Water movie.

MV5BMTI5NTUwMjIwMl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNzE4NzkyMw@@._V1_.jpg
LR3 is supposed to be great for pumps, at the very least. I feel like delts are always a good one for making freakishly big, Kevin Levrone style. Delts are the one body part that can cause you to increase your ultimate width. That's my vote, anyhow
 
the dose has to be pretty high to cause hyperplasia i heard a min of 18iu for hyperplasia to happen.
I've heard this too, and I've actually gone that high with gh briefly, but lowered it due to cost considerations, so it definitely wasn't going to happen in my case. I still don't see that there's actual, compelling evidence that this is true. I'd be interested in any research backing up this claim, preferably in vivo, although I'm not sure even in vitro studies exist. The only results I see for gh and hyperplasia are related to pituitary and mammary gland hyperplasia.
 
Back
Top