Photon
Member
then obviously we don't need to villanize a vendor that is doing additional testing...but what the hell do I know.
Not sure what you mean by that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
then obviously we don't need to villanize a vendor that is doing additional testing...but what the hell do I know.
AFAIK the only reason Primal is being mentioned in conjunction with this project is his oils contained the micro plastics. But the project is not limited to that vendor specifically.So is the issue mostly that Primal needs to upgrade his bottle top filter when brewing? If so, should be easy enough fix,.or not?
Or is there a more nefarious concern? (e.g. oils are actually some Chinese made shit being resold after repackaging?) I'll be honest I fell way too behind to follow all this.
it's from october 2024. Stored vacuum sealed with oxygen absorber in a cool dark environmenthow old is that stock? and how was it stored?
Remind me please, what did it test by HPLC (purity)?First sample of test C sent from me from my old stock has been analyzed:
This is the result
Second sample results sent from @Sera should be soon received
96+%Remind me please, what did it test by HPLC (purity)?
Thank you for testing it by GCMS.
I will go through this and the other ones. Very interesting.96+%
any explanation, insight, comments on the GCMS?
from my ignorance it has a high % of that 4-6androstadien similar to the NPP? or am I confusing things?
oh yeah you are right it's the TNE. they said your sample analysis will be ready soonNo I think it’s the one that was in the TNE
@Sampei
what the hell, old raw only tested as test and delta 6 testI will go through this and the other ones. Very interesting.
we have went over delta 6 test which is completely useless making him off with a 76% raw which is a big problem.96+%
any explanation, insight, comments on the GCMS?
from my ignorance it has a high % of that 4-6androstadien similar to the NPP? or am I confusing things?
what the hell, old raw only tested as test and delta 6 test
we have went over delta 6 test which is completely useless making him off with a 76% raw which is a big problem.
but now we're back to my first guess. you have benzoyl solvents(Acrylophenone) and and synthetic impurities in there(Methylbenzenesulfonyloxy)
this is absolutely unacceptable if this were the pure raw
where is that ass picture with severe necrosis.
First sample of test C sent from me from my old stock has been analyzed:
This is the result
Second sample results sent from @Sera should be soon received
second sample results is out!
whoops, and whoops.First sample of test C sent from me from my old stock has been analyzed:
This is the result
Second sample results sent from @Sera should be soon received
you are making me go out and get coffee.second sample results is out!
HPLC tested raw purity for that one? I think it is important to always pair these results when reporting.
second sample results is out!
you are making me go out and get coffee.
geniunely have to look up bond 16 now aswell? this isnt even from testosterone synthesis impurity. its cross contaimination impurity from another steroid synthesis.
and ignoring that you have 1,7,7-Trimethyl-3-phenylaminobicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol
really heptan? aswell? @readalot
@SeraHPLC tested raw purity for that one? I think it is important to always pair these results when reporting.
Comes back to prior discussion/concern of potential co-elution of peaks with HPLC. GC with proper derivitization has much higher chromatographic efficiency so sometimes you miss stuff with HPLC. Not stating for a fact that is the case here, but something we must keep in mind moving forward.
Also if we have raw data for the HPLC runs that would be helpful.
This is extremely important data that is being collected and should inform UG users on the applicability of HPLC purity results.
