Ghoul
Member
Anecdotally it's oils / pills that get seized at a much higher rate. Not this vendor in particular, but across the board. Most of the SSA reported seizures were AAS not Peptides/GH.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Wuhan Wansheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (USA, International)
- Thread starter Wansheng Biotechnology
- Start date
Anecdotally it's oils / pills that get seized at a much higher rate. Not this vendor in particular, but across the board. Most of the SSA reported seizures were AAS not Peptides/GH.
SDNative77
Member
People forget HGH is a peptide. It’s not a controlled substance. But thanks to Biden’s controlled substance act it was labeled as illegal, just not a controlled substance
Haha was gonna say the same thing. It's Todd Lee pinning a gram a day.
I wonder if they will refund is stuff is missing( no oils) or a different size IE 36iu because the 40s were out
Photon
Member
Record urself opening it
Ghoul
Member
You mean distribution of HGH was criminalized under the 1990 Anabolic Steroid Control Act passed as part of the 1990 Crime Control Act, but please, don't let facts get in your way.
CarvinDC125
Member
First bottle I did not filter.
Second bottle 100% filter! And if I use the third and last bottle I got on my next cycle I’ll 100% filter now that I know it’s lower quality oils involved.
Between filtering and not though I honestly did not feel a difference at all, just maybe a little peace of mind.
CarvinDC125
Member
That’s a shame they consider it illegal..illicitly using it to reverse aging and wasting it says…why is that so bad? Why is getting healthy so bad? It’s not like freaking heroine or something!
CarvinDC125
Member
Honestly I’m not sure I believe him, but if he’s that greedy for real that’s sad.
But it does seem as though CBP finds a lot of HGH in their confiscation reports. I can tell you first-hand, they make a lot of claims in those reports that they never actually tested or validated to be HGH. I had a bottle of tabs seized that they claimed were HGH and it showed up in the seizure reports.
Sorry, I forgot Biden helped push that through back in the day. My bad to assume you meant his administration.
Ghoul
Member
I follow a lot of medical science news, the sources of which are littered with a lot of opinion pieces about ethics and other subjects not science related.
The vast majority of medicine, as an institution, is geared to fix things after they go wrong. The older the patient, the less effort and resources are to be expended.
A small fraction is focused on prevention.
NONE is geared toward using medical technology to exceed natural limitations. Not because it isn't possible, but because of some unspoken moral unease with it.
This medical puritanism is putting the brakes on anti-aging treatments. Medical societies are on a campaign to ensure that "Aging is not to be considered a disease requiring treatment".
As demented as it may sound, I think this is some sort of desire to ensure people don't "consume more than their fair share of life". There's also a streak of "It would be absolutely intolerable for those in wealthy countries to enjoy a longer than natural life not available to others"
There's a theme in rHGH research on healthy, middle aged and older people. I can't describe it as anything but decades of in your face gaslighting. It's well represented by a study I recently read.
65 year olds were given 6 months of, roughly, 3iu rHGH.
The results were a significant improvement in body composition and reports of well being. All major biomarkers improved, lipids, bp, inflammation..... insulin sensitivity worsened slightly but was clinically insignificant.
Central adiposity (mostly harmful visceral fat) showed a huge reduction and lean mass a significant increase. Side effects were minor and mostly tolerable (same side effects we all know about). Overall it all sounded fantastic.
The summary:
"rHGH is not an effective treatment for aging related central adiposity".
This is essentially what every rHGH study that shows benefits for non-sick people concludes. The data all shows it works great, the conclusion is always careful to dismiss or downplay those benefits, as if the researchers know they're treading into dangerous territory.
krasnoyarsk
Subscriber
I am placing an order [EU] - will update y'all.
Last edited:
OldmemberNewcuenta
Member
I have a few wuhan contacts all over.
Can someone link the post of their TG and whatsapp contacts? going back to the main post here I simply see a gmail account that I wont be reaching out to. the wuhans I have dont seem to be Wuhan Wansheng bio. they say something else after Wuhan so i don't know.
Can someone link the post of their TG and whatsapp contacts? going back to the main post here I simply see a gmail account that I wont be reaching out to. the wuhans I have dont seem to be Wuhan Wansheng bio. they say something else after Wuhan so i don't know.
Same 0,5 kg? How can this be?
Lucacerve
Member
Normally , seeing other people receiving the pack in 7-12 days ...i expect too to receive this week... Bro but for me the weight its correct..vials are not so heavy ...one kit 0,15kg?
Sorry for bad english
My last order from SSA had 7 Stromuc vials and a weight of 0.24 kg (that's what it said on the package). Now I have 22 and 30 peptides. There's no way that can be 0.5 kg.
Similar threads
