OEP LABS Domestic

He's a goddam magician.

He accidentally managed to make my wife think the pack that arrived was a birthday present for her (I'm good with that kinda "heat".... Since I got the birthday stuff covered...LMFAO)....As opposed to having her stewing and pissed wondering why I have 10 more vials of anabolics arriving in the mail. (I mean the woman is a goddam bloodhound for shit I'm trying to order.... probably spent all day sniffing the fucking box trying to figure out what it was...lol)

I'm just gonna pack these far away until I'm good and ready...lol.
She must be a talented sandwich maker if she can sniff the mail at the same time.
 
Penche my man,finally open up to meso!
My dude i remember your handle and pit, OG veteran
anabolic associate? PED partner?
Lmao anabolic associated love it
Remember You as well my man. Appreciate the Old Timers following along.

I have reports to share. @newguy2 you know I got you on the ping.

The hplc report does match the numbers i crunch off the top of my head. Thank you to the Jano team for producing fast results.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8626.webp
    IMG_8626.webp
    76.8 KB · Views: 133
  • IMG_8627.webp
    IMG_8627.webp
    91.1 KB · Views: 134
  • IMG_8630.webp
    IMG_8630.webp
    40.4 KB · Views: 118
  • IMG_8629.webp
    IMG_8629.webp
    95.3 KB · Views: 105
  • IMG_8628.webp
    IMG_8628.webp
    73.8 KB · Views: 131
My dude i remember your handle and pit, OG veteran

Lmao anabolic associated love it
Remember You as well my man. Appreciate the Old Timers following along.

I have reports to share. @newguy2 you know I got you on the ping.

The hplc report does match the numbers i crunch off the top of my head. Thank you to the Jano team for producing fast results.
Damn pretty good numbers as expected!!! Now time to order more lol
 
Need to address the BA content by .26 minimum, can do that tomorrow for sure

Your BA is probably fine.
This test doesn't show the actual BA content.
It's more qualitative than quantitative.
1758273821595.webp

For BA/BB content, you need a separate $30 test.
(Don't think the test is needed)
 
Last edited:
My dude i remember your handle and pit, OG veteran

Lmao anabolic associated love it
Remember You as well my man. Appreciate the Old Timers following along.

I have reports to share. @newguy2 you know I got you on the ping.

The hplc report does match the numbers i crunch off the top of my head. Thank you to the Jano team for producing fast results.
So the GCMS report came back. Thanks.
 
He is. An honorable individual indeed.

Thank you Samp appreciate words my dude.
Your BA is probably fine.
This test doesn't show the actual BA content.
It's more qualitative than quantitative.
View attachment 348887

For BA/BB content, you need a separate $30 test.
(Don't think the test is needed)
Can’t thank you enough for this advice you gave me.

Edit: usually only order HPLC reports and purity Reports. First time on GCMS but after some reading now i know why you guys push to do the gcms reports. Math against the purity. Learn something new everyday

So the GCMS report came back. Thanks.
Indeed it did my man
 
Last edited:
My dude i remember your handle and pit, OG veteran

Lmao anabolic associated love it
Remember You as well my man. Appreciate the Old Timers following along.

I have reports to share. @newguy2 you know I got you on the ping.

The hplc report does match the numbers i crunch off the top of my head. Thank you to the Jano team for producing fast results.
Thank you for that sir. Nailed it on the dosing!
 
My dude i remember your handle and pit, OG veteran

Lmao anabolic associated love it
Remember You as well my man. Appreciate the Old Timers following along.

I have reports to share. @newguy2 you know I got you on the ping.

The hplc report does match the numbers i crunch off the top of my head. Thank you to the Jano team for producing fast results.
Is this sample using the same raws that tested with some TNE? If so, do you know why that wouldn’t show in the oil test?
 
Is this sample using the same raws that tested with some TNE? If so, do you know why that wouldn’t show in the oil test?
That is correct sir. I hav the formula to calculate purity against the gcms report however jano experts stated this below

“In both cases, we use HPLC for the analysis of both samples.
I believe you have GCMS done on the oil sample, but purity is not calculated for finished products and GCMS is not relevant since we use it only for identification.”

So it seems there’s conflicting views but jano is the subject matter expert.

The reason more likely it didn’t show in the hplc report is because my target was 265-268ish equating the 2-3% if raw scored 98% Then additional tolerance of 2% OD for either human error, digital scale error or beaker equipment error. I left no room for a mistake plus gave me a fighting chance to stay above 250mg/ml no matter what.
 
That is correct sir. I hav the formula to calculate purity against the gcms report however jano experts stated this below

“In both cases, we use HPLC for the analysis of both samples.
I believe you have GCMS done on the oil sample, but purity is not calculated for finished products and GCMS is not relevant since we use it only for identification.”

So it seems there’s conflicting views but jano is the subject matter expert.

The reason more likely it didn’t show in the hplc report is because my target was 265-268ish equating the 2-3% if raw scored 98% Then additional tolerance of 2% OD for either human error, digital scale error or beaker equipment error. I left no room for a mistake plus gave me a fighting chance to stay above 250mg/ml no matter what.
I don't think anyone is going to make a fuss over 5-8% variance +/- the labeled dose

Pretty much expect this for anything non-pharma, due to slight variations in raws purities from UGL's and human factors
 
That is correct sir. I hav the formula to calculate purity against the gcms report however jano experts stated this below

“In both cases, we use HPLC for the analysis of both samples.
I believe you have GCMS done on the oil sample, but purity is not calculated for finished products and GCMS is not relevant since we use it only for identification.”

So it seems there’s conflicting views but jano is the subject matter expert.

The reason more likely it didn’t show in the hplc report is because my target was 265-268ish equating the 2-3% if raw scored 98% Then additional tolerance of 2% OD for either human error, digital scale error or beaker equipment error. I left no room for a mistake plus gave me a fighting chance to stay above 250mg/ml no matter what.

To be fair you can just get rid of the TNE by brewing per normal and then filtering it out. TNE has a very high melting point and requires more solvents than usual. Jano has a threshold whereby anything below a certain amount is excluded, I think that TNE amount would have been excluded, however it should technically appear in CGMS even at a low %.

Was that reply given by a Jano (company) rep via email or by Jano (email) himself?
 
Thank you @ChemBB it is very close to label so did my best against the odds of our current situation raw shortage.

So there are only maybe 3-4 outstanding invoices that have not received their receipt(track). They will get it within 20hrs without a doubt.

After that I have 2 bins of TC that are fairly empty. My deca is looking low as well, still have the deca tested 317 version in a glass media bottle. Can send pics to Validate to anyone of my clients.

Blind samples always encourage as well.

Back to the Test cyp. I need to transfer some media over into small bottles again it is in my best interest to not take any coin(invoices/orders) and focus on being in the clean room transferring the media. Rather not let all 4 bins go empty that is excessive labor to fill all 4. Requesting 2-3 day intermission to focus on TC and the Deca. Plus modify the pastebin. Won’t be taking any coin during this time, I’m sorry that may frustrate some members but I feel better not taking coin until product is fully stocked ready to rock n roll

Thank you for bearing with me, the 1 man team
 
Back
Top