GCMS and HPLC -- any relationship?

Looking over the general approach a little more, makes perfect sense to have one linear model for MCT and another for GSO. Vapor pressures, etc.

Should cover just about everything. Inclusion of BA on the GC peaks should not change anything really in terms of model fit. 1%?
Just checked MCT model against first tren data coming back from group testing project. Not too bad!
 
Was not expecting that.
That's 12 bundle tests, 6 for GSO and 6 for MCT.
Infinity War Avengers GIF by Marvel Studios
 
@TallandSmall you made a big difference Brother.

Still haven't forgotten about the other thread. Too many projects. Embarrassment of riches coming.
Thanks. Don’t worry about my thread. This is what the people are going to care about (besides the Tren). Huge thanks to @Primal_Pharma. I don't think I would have sent in the compounded if I wasn't expecting to be reimbursed on the testing for their products. Huge commitment from @Primal_Pharma for the future also!

ChatGPT Image Aug 28, 2025, 07_59_05 PM.webp
 
If you can also link the purported vendor HPLC result as well that would really help. Thanks so much!
unfortunately I don't have one. The Chinese seller PUCA doesn't test much lol

Here is a screen without raw data for now
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5672.webp
    IMG_5672.webp
    65.7 KB · Views: 22
This GCMS mainstreaming gonna open some eyes.

I mean pharma does use 50 percent for nebido and from my experience, no issues with crp or pip with high BB. I do try and brew with low BB but it's just a personal preference.

Chinese oils probably come from the same factory if not 1 or 2 factories. These guys are all just wholesale distributors.

Being able to pin like water is a desirable trait for oils and this is achieved by high BB and or eo.
 
Back
Top