Yes because in the context of injecting illegal drugs into our body clearly the context indicates one is talking about the statistical significance of precise instruments, not whether or not the fact that in reality his stupid example he didn't even read showed degradation down to a whopping 97% purity after 3 months at 113 degrees which no one with a non psychotic brain would interpret as anything but a testament to the durability of peptides.
If you perform a study with such precise instruments you will find a "statistically significant difference" with basically any change. For people who are capable of utilizing more than 2 brain cells at a time, they generally then proceed to use their mental faculties (which i understand not everyone is capable of doing) to determine whether this matters in practicality.
Go conduct a large enough study on health markers in people who forcibly concentrate regulating their respiratory rate to 13 vs 14 breaths per minute, and with a large enough sample size you'll find some statistically significant 0.00001% difference in some measure or another, and seeing as you seem to lack any sort of common sense you will then probably proceed to spend the rest of your life with a timer strapped to your wrist trying to breathe at 13 or 14 or whatever breaths per minute 24 hours a day because your newly learned big word is written similarly to a word with a different practical meaning, aka "significant".
