Most of the "data" we have on them is
marketing science straight from the people manufacturing and selling them. We need more published clinical, repeatable, results. I'm hesitant to try any of them. The anecdotes are all over the place. Most of the positive feedback can easily be written off as placebo and individual subconscious protection against buyer's remorse.
People are desperate for a quick and easy fix. Look at AOD-9604 - we have actual data that it
doesn't work (it was abandoned during trials because of a clear lack of results) and suckers still buy it and pin it.
Who knows, there may be something to them. What were your dosages and frequency? What were the perceived effects? Sure, you don't have the means to analyze results on a cellular or molecular level, but you're still a pioneer. The best thing you can do is introduce them one at a time and keep a logbook. And get labs if possible to correlate other data.
I'm aware you probably don't care that much. But What Would
@readalot Do?