Photon
Member
Yes
PIP heaven btw.
Really good deal tho, Tren A 100 alone is 250.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic
- Thread starter Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
- Start date
Yes
PIP heaven btw.
Really good deal tho, Tren A 100 alone is 250.
A
Anonymous member 154437
Guest
OldmemberNewcuenta
Member
until they read my comment. it'll be $500 by 10pm lol. it is a great deal based on the pricing of the compounds within the blend. *Their pricing
sad to hear its bad on the pip though. i may grab a kit. I was thinking to get a kit of tren A, but the price on that blend hmmm. Had i not just gotten some mast it would be an absolute no-brainer
Photon
Member
TR E and H look pretty bad, no clue about A.
A looks pretty good.
As promised @readalot - pic of my collection…
If You need another setup, diff. background etc. I Will give it another shot…. All at 100 mg pr ml
except the E at 200 mg pr ml ( QSC last batc Nov.-Dec 24 , Yura, sorry deleted my correspondance from last Year ,it was growing to Big - about spring last Year, i Think , Pharmaqo mfg date 02-2022 on both of them )
If You need another setup, diff. background etc. I Will give it another shot…. All at 100 mg pr ml
except the E at 200 mg pr ml ( QSC last batc Nov.-Dec 24 , Yura, sorry deleted my correspondance from last Year ,it was growing to Big - about spring last Year, i Think , Pharmaqo mfg date 02-2022 on both of them )
BrunoES
Member
I get what you are saying, and I agree. And before I say what I am going to say, keep in mind I do am going to filter it.
But my line of thinking is this: They want to make money. If they made a bad quality product (contaminants, etc), someone would catch it with a test. The word would spread, and quickly they would start losing customers. Thats why I believe they do make an effort to make a high quality product. Not because they care about "us", because they care about them.
Photon
Member
Too much shit to test for.
Who's going to spend so much?
There's no one test catch all.
dcfreak
Member
Ghoul
Member
This is the problem with testing as "harm reduction".
The type of testing we rely on is primarily for identifying its the correct substance, quantity, and a rough measure of its purity,
It's the "purity" part that gives people a false sense of security, because its meaning in chemistry terms is not how most people interpret "purity".
If I tell you a bottle of water has been tested and is 99.9999%. pure, you'll know it's free of dangerous contaminants and safe to drink.
If I tell you that peptide is 99.8% pure most assume that means it's also free of contaminants and safe to inject.
Except that's not what it means. It's not a measure of "other stuff". The only impurities tested for are other things closely related to the peptide. Pieces of it, the wrong sequence of proteins.... essentially defective peptide.
You could have a dose of arsenic, some mold, and ground up dried worm in the vial and still have it test 99.8% pure. All those other things require separate tests. You have to be looking for specific things to find them.
I'll also point out that all samples are filtered with a .22um syringe filter first. That's standard practice.
So the test results are of the reconstituted peptide after it's FILTERED.
If you're not filtering, you're not injecting what the test results show.
The only harm you're protected from by the tests is 1) The harm of getting ripped off and 2) Getting the wrong substance, which could be harmful if you get something like Melanotan instead of Reta.
Pharma does "purity" testing, but it's only one 5 to 8 different tests on each batch of peptide to ensure safety.
Spaceman Spiff
Subscriber
Keep justifying your cheap/broke ass from never testing anything you inject.
or even throwing down money for advanced testing which you kept talking about
You proved me right in the "Specialized testing thread". Where are your "Friends" with NMR testing? Where is your money for it?
What I think is funny is that you say I wont "Run you off"
Did I run you off of that topic? Is that why you wont respond to anyone there when they tag you? Lol what a joke
Last edited:
My throway date is 91 days after reconstituting. But I've never actually reach that.
ineffectual
Member
You have me tempted to grab a kit. I have no experience with any of it but I bet it's fun. Have to start eating again though.
Is SSAs tren a always that dark?TR E and H look pretty bad, no clue about A.
A looks pretty good.
As promised @readalot - pic of my collection…
If You need another setup, diff. background etc. I Will give it another shot…. All at 100 mg pr ml
@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals what's your email or telegram account? Wanna buy some HGH
Photon
Member
The one thats dark is the Hex (and E).
Idk but something just looks wrong with this Hex..
BamaCrazy
Banned
It’s posted one page back. And QSC doesn’t have access to their account so they cannot see your post.
The labels apparently all say Tren H. My TC came marked the same way. Contacted them about it and was told its just a shipping label but doesnt id whats in the package. My TC was very clear, same as it was from another vendor.
I'm concerned about the brown tren e. Tren e is supposed to be easier to get a nice golden color the tren a from what I've read and seen from other vendors. If the tren e looks like that, I can only imagine what the tren a looks like. Tracy sent me a picture of some nice golden vials of tren a, so I was really tempted to buy some. I'll probably wait until someone else orders some before I order (if they're not sold out by then)
pizzathehutt
New Member
My “Test C” has the same cap and color clarity. And some floaters.
Has there ever been a brown colored tren e that tested well on Jano?
Photon
Member
Similar threads
