OEP LABS
Subscriber
But seriously I can get it but it’s not cheap at all
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't take your anger out on me just because OEP is oeping your ass lmao. But I'm sure I've read it here on the forum, hence the + sign after for eg 98% so what does that mean if it's 95%+? 96? 97? 98?And this is coming from where? Fantasy unicorn land story?
Geez Sampei even when I was a member you were always so angry. But okay I got you. From now on purity checksYou should do both, raw purity is for you to understand the quality of the raws you have in hand and then to be able to brew at the proper concentration, testing oil is to show you have done your homework and produced a quality product
Both should be done. If you get 85% test C what are you doing? Brewing that shit for your customers?
lol awwwee you get a bit triggered you piece of shit loser ? GENERIC ASIA … atta boy, great call on that one, you’re such a smart intelligent little boy !!Are you really try to do this you little pathetic shit? You don't even know the reasons of why I had to contact him lol
Why don't you crawl back into your hole ?
What's your contribution to this forum apart from leaving shit stain where ever you post?
You are being a lovely shill, now suck a dick and shut up
I ain't angry at allGeez Sampei even when I was a member you were always so angry. But okay I got you. From now on purity checks
It has been explained, the % error on most raws is less than 2% and when a raws is 96% but not 98% Jano decided to just put a + anything below gets the exact purity.Don't take your anger out on me just because OEP is oeping your ass lmao. But I'm sure I've read it here on the forum, hence the + sign after for eg 98% so what does that mean if it's 95%+? 96? 97? 98?
Fair enough. I get what you’re saying. However sometimes first hand on experience over the many years, I have nothing to gain lying on the silicone subject. I mean hell I just took a $80I ain't angry at all
I'm just surprised you haven't read the forum and checked what's the standard for sources lately.
From @Primal_Pharma to @Dutch Labs and a few others, they have done their homework, they ain't perfect but shit they are trying hard at least in keeping up with the standards we have set.
lol awwwee you get a bit triggered you piece of shit loser ? GENERIC ASIA … atta boy, great call on that one, you’re such a smart intelligent little boy !!
Love all these long time members that call others little that have never posted a physique pic. You must look like @Ghoul
See here under AAS raw test.Don't take your anger out on me just because OEP is oeping your ass lmao. But I'm sure I've read it here on the forum, hence the + sign after for eg 98% so what does that mean if it's 95%+? 96? 97? 98?
I explained it to you, the leeching of contaminants doesn't mean you will find the stopper liquified. There is a reason no pharmaceutical company use silicone stopper when the injection preparation contains BB or other solvents that don't react well to itFair enough. I get what you’re saying. However sometimes first hand on experience over the many years, I have nothing to gain lying on the silicone subject. I mean hell I just took a $80
Trest vial apart. But I get you, I speak from my years of experience is all. Not arguing with you brother for real
I have really tried to get him to report xx.xx% +/- y% but to no avail.It has been explained, the % error on most raws is less than 2% and when a raws is 96% but not 98% Jano decided to just put a + anything below gets the exact purity.
True but from being confused to assert that Jano can't measure purity is a bit far fetched and I'm trying to be niceI have really tried to get him to report xx.xx% +/- y% but to no avail.
You can request the actual measurement xx.xx% as I posted up above (i am sure you know but posting for others). The +xx% terminology confuses people as we just saw an example.
This is bizarre thread.I explained it to you, the leeching of contaminants doesn't mean you will find the stopper liquified. There is a reason no pharmaceutical company use silicone stopper when the injection preparation contains BB or other solvents that don't react well to it
I mean we can argue the whole night but I the end it's just chemistry. It's the same reason we don't use PVDF filters for high BB contents.
One question why the fuck do you keep saying you wasted a vial of trest of 80$ values when you can just refilter the oil into a sterile vial and you haven't lost a dime xD
I don't get it
Nope, just tired of hearing your mouth run is all … as usual like Mr Know It All.Ghoul look like Ronnie Coleman compared to me, that ain't changing you are shilling your ass out and your mouth is full , don't need to say of what![]()
Absolutely true. Jano can measure raw purity extremely well. A lot of confusion and ignorance.True but from being confused to assert that Jano can't measure purity is a bit far fetched and I'm trying to be nice
Nope, just tired of hearing your mouth run is all … as usual like Mr Know It All.
Looks like those silicone stoppers held up just fine huh after 7 years.
To accurately assess this issue, if in fact the BB/oil has been in contact with the silicone for 7 years, you would need to measure the siloxane level in the gear. Silicone is a polymer of siloxane. Just viewing the stopper doesnt tell the story.
![]()
Polydimethylsiloxane - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
![]()
Silicone - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
