Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

The thing that always piqued my conspiracy senses is this....REGARDLESS whether Ivermectin worked for 'rona or not, it's generally as safe as taking Tylenol.

First, my sincere condolences.

I have read that, were Tylenol a new drug, it’s likely it would not pass the FDA’s safety threshold to be approved for OTC sales today. This is due to the “safety therapeutic index” being rather low. It’s approximately 10-15 for humans, and represents the ratio of LD50 to ED50 (lethal dose for 50% of population / minimum effective dose for 50% of population). Course, that’s about the same value assigned to…ethanol.

The “protective index” is even smaller, if one is trying to keep one’s liver healthy and giving one all the support one needs.

Whereas ivermectin appears to have a (computed) safety therapeutic index of 200. Higher is better.

This is all, of course, related to acute toxicity. I haven’t looked at the data for regular ivermectin use wrt any deleterious effects with long term usage, but did see some potential neurotoxicity listed in search results.

TTA
 
They were on the price list at the end of last year so I would say yes. If qsc was suddenly raided, shut down, and owner's arrested I doubt there was time to smuggle raws out but who knows really
Agreed: compare the last US domestic price list they released before emergency shutdown to the resurrection price list, almost exactly the same. Adjustments were likely purely due to doing inventory before/during rollout.

Edit re “likely”: yes just my opinion, but Tracy mentioned having to do counts/inventories at least a couple times since returning.

TTA
 
Last edited:
a
First, my sincere condolences.

I have read that, were Tylenol a new drug, it’s likely it would not pass the FDA’s safety threshold to be approved for OTC sales today. This is due to the “safety therapeutic index” being rather low. It’s approximately 10-15 for humans, and represents the ratio of LD50 to ED50 (lethal dose for 50% of population / minimum effective dose for 50% of population). Course, that’s about the same value assigned to…ethanol.

The “protective index” is even smaller, if one is trying to keep one’s liver healthy and giving one all the support one needs.

Whereas ivermectin appears to have a (computed) safety therapeutic index of 200. Higher is better.

This is all, of course, related to acute toxicity. I haven’t looked at the data for regular ivermectin use wrt any deleterious effects with long term usage, but did see some potential neurotoxicity listed in search results.

TTA

For the rare folks with a compromised blood brain barrier, yes. However, it's unlikely you'd be unaware of this.

Other effects are primarily from the toxins released by mass die off of parasites for those severely infested.

Other than that, problems are extremely rare.

I don't see any utility in more than one course a year, some situations every 6 months, so regular use would be unusual.
 
First, my sincere condolences.

I have read that, were Tylenol a new drug, it’s likely it would not pass the FDA’s safety threshold to be approved for OTC sales today. This is due to the “safety therapeutic index” being rather low. It’s approximately 10-15 for humans, and represents the ratio of LD50 to ED50 (lethal dose for 50% of population / minimum effective dose for 50% of population). Course, that’s about the same value assigned to…ethanol.

The “protective index” is even smaller, if one is trying to keep one’s liver healthy and giving one all the support one needs.

Whereas ivermectin appears to have a (computed) safety therapeutic index of 200. Higher is better.

This is all, of course, related to acute toxicity. I haven’t looked at the data for regular ivermectin use wrt any deleterious effects with long term usage, but did see some potential neurotoxicity listed in search results.

TTA
Neurotoxicity I have first hand experience of witnessing. Was just dismissed as Malaria..
Many things back then were dismissed as Typhoid or Malaria..
It's not typical in western populations... then again, western populations weren't regularly dosing it.
 
Doesn’t matter. Point is Tracy pops up out of no where saying QSC was investigated. Now he’s selling at a huge markup. Tariffs supposedly going to increase next month on China and US customs going to crackdown on China.
Well… that’s just, like, your opinion, man.
 
One theory is that Covid spread prevention practices were more effective at curbing flu than they were at curbing covid.
Absolutely....and colds too. I sanitize my hands constantly at the gym more out of fear for colds/flu than for Covid. Although I have gotten Covid 3 times.
 
No. But what we know is that when IGF is kept at 1.3x or lower of the Upper Limit of Normal for your age, cancer rates are no higher than non rHGH users.

There may be a safety margin above that, like 1.5x for a few years. but the longer you intend to stay on the smaller that margin of safety is. At 2x acromegaly is likely to start changing your appearance around year 2.

Risk = Time x Exposure
Thats what the literature seems to say, However I like to keep my IGF-1 levels right at the upper limit, not much higher, just to be safe.
 
The hind leg doesn't need to be suggestive when the horse cock is right there in the illustration
Ahhhhh...almost had me bro. I ain't zooming in on horse cock.

Ha Ha Smile GIF by The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon
 
No. But what we know is that when IGF is kept at 1.3x or lower of the Upper Limit of Normal for your age, cancer rates are no higher than non rHGH users.

There may be a safety margin above that, like 1.5x for a few years. but the longer you intend to stay on the smaller that margin of safety is. At 2x acromegaly is likely to start changing your appearance around year 2.

Risk = Time x Exposure
You've pretty much scared me off from GH.

And AI says it will blow my kidneys if I go over 2-3 IU. Probably not true, but using GH does increase my cystatin c by at least .1.



Are all these bodybuilders doing 8iu+ for 10 years fucking themselves over?
 
You've pretty much scared me off from GH.

And AI says it will blow my kidneys if I go over 2-3 IU. Probably not true, but using GH does increase my cystatin c by at least .1.



Are all these bodybuilders doing 8iu+ for 10 years fucking themselves over?
isnt that indirectly by increaseing your blood pressure from the water retentive effects of hgh?

if you control for BP and see what you can do to hold less water, maybe you wouldnt see that increase in cytastatin, what do you think?
 
Back
Top