MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

Wonder how @Primal_Pharma feels about it. On the one hand, it’s bigly noisy. On the other hand, this is a two week old source with a 41 page thread. Pharmaqo is an internationally recognized brand with a 5 year old thread and has 174 pages.

At this rate, Primal (thread) will be the next QSC (thread). Right or wrong, that brings some credibility. If they’re talking about you, it’s a good thing.

I suspect this thread has also polarized/radicalized some people into Primal lifelong loyal customers. Sort of a “I love liberal tears” situation.

Anyway, my point is that I look forward to my free gear and/or hoodie for my part in making this source’s launch a big splash. I wear L Tall or XL and I have 32” biceps.
Fire Elmo GIF
 
That moment was around post 1 in this thread and the subsequent ones in which Primal promised to completely change the game. Which is great news to hear.

Couldn't be, since every source on this board ever has claimed the same, yet we've gotten nowhere beyond what I pointed out.

It's a UGL man, phew. Harm reduction, sure, I get it. However, readalot is just fingering his asshole at this point, and apparently that got you aroused.

Seriously, one post asking for XYZ evidence backing XYZ claim, followed by the quality of the source response, was enough data for members to have for the sake of "harm reduction."

You guys could actualiy be pushing members away from a better source than what's been available all year by going about things like this. If you deter a member from this source to a Chinese source that hasn't tested their oils in a year or 2, you're accomplishing nothing for the members here. It's simply not clear that this is reducing harm in the context of what Meso is and what's available here.
 
However, readalot is just fingering his asshole at this point, and apparently that got you aroused.
Don't stop there, dude! I'm so close.

Yeah, I don't think we can know what will lead to net minimum harm. Other than convincing everybody to knock off all this black market pharmacology. Maybe that's the real agenda...

Members here are (very) big boys and girls making their own adult decisions. I don't see any justification for shifting responsibility for those decisions to other people engaging in a good faith discussion and asking questions.
 
Haven't been around here for a bit but after not pinning anything other than glp1s for a few years, my penis and I decided it was time to run a test/tren cycle again this summer and constantly chase the bride around at 54...

Realized my tren e wasnt gonna last till labor day and coulda used another vial of test too. I've used Stanny exclusively for years but last week I needed 2 vials that's it... @Primal_Pharma sent me tracking 5 hours after my purchase last Friday and I just TD'd my small order with a bonus tren so I can stay a big whore. So can't speak to the product but all the basic good shit is there, triple packaged, straight good looking labels, consistent fills, etc... and I prefer the mct oil. So yall my young brothers can have at me but I'm pleased and had to plug Primal for the freebie. Only thing I've got free in last 10 years was 50 dbol pills that I gave away cuz I don't do orals cuz I like my bourbon.
 
That's not very harm reduction of you.
I'm more Lawful Neutral than Chaotic Good.

Seriously, we may have different interpretations of what that phrase implies. To me, it certainly isn't taking responsibility for others' decisions. Everybody is a free agent. "Harm reduction" is the opposite of the governmental approach, which is to attempt to solve the problem by making potentially harmful things illegal and take choice away from people.
 

And BTW, when will mast e and primo be back in stock?
There's no false dichotomy here. If you don't give a fuck, I don't give a fuck. If you only care about members be harmed by A because that's immoral to you, but are comfortable with B-Z possibly causing harm, then fuck it. That's stupid to me. I keep my mouth shut if I'm not certain I'm helping someone and not hurting them. That's what I'm saying. Last I checked, I'm a member here and can give my 2 cents about harm reduction like anyone else.

It's definitely been meso tradtion for the biggest whiners to act like sources are the enemy and members themselves can never be responsible for harm. I don't see it that way. I think members probably hurt other members more than the sources do, quite frankly.
 
I'm more Lawful Neutral than Chaotic Good.

Seriously, we may have different interpretations of what that phrase implies. To me, it certainly isn't taking responsibility for others' decisions. Everybody is a free agent. "Harm reduction" is the opposite of the governmental approach, which is to attempt to solve the problem by making potentially harmful things illegal and take choice away from people.
Everyone is trying to tell you and readalot that it's getting annoying, and you response was "harm reduction." If you want to put that shield down and just say "Idc if you think I'm annoying" then cool.
 
Everyone is trying to tell you and readalot that it's getting annoying, and you response was "harm reduction." If you want to put that shield down and just say "Idc if you think I'm annoying" then cool.
You keep putting words in my mouth. I hope in this day and age, you know that before you put something in somebody's mouth, you should get consent.

I've hard what you have to say. Noted. As you say, we all have every right to opine, and you are free to ignore me in the old-fashioned way, or via the site feature.
 
You keep putting words in my mouth. I hope in this day and age, you know that before you put something in somebody's mouth, you should get consent.

I've hard what you have to say. Noted. As you say, we all have every right to opine, and you are free to ignore me in the old-fashioned way, or via the site feature.
Guys. I put words in his mouth. When I told him the way he's handling his beef w this source was unhelpful at best, he definitely didn't pull the harm reduction card.
 
Back
Top