Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. If they gave you a USPS tracking number it usually doesn’t start tracking it until it lands in the US. If they gave you an international tracking number parcels app should see it once it starts moving.What do you guys use for tracking? I tried the parcels app but nothing coming up. Pack coming to the US. You just put the tracking in USPS and wait for it to hit the states and then come alive?
Ok thanks. I got an LX number. Ends with AE.Yes. If they gave you a USPS tracking number it usually doesn’t start tracking it until it lands in the US. If they gave you an international tracking number parcels app should see it once it starts moving.
You won't hear anything at all unless there is an issue. You will simply receive your tracking number 3-5 days later.Think you could reply to my email when you have the chance?
paid and sent confirmation yesterday morning and still haven't heard back with anything ^^
Might be your first order, after payment he will return to you in a couple days with the tracking number. Usually not on weekends.Think you could reply to my email when you have the chance?
paid and sent confirmation yesterday morning and still haven't heard back with anything ^^
Gotcha , used to getting a payment confirmation from other placesMight be your first order, after payment he will return to you in a couple days with the tracking number. Usually not on weekends.
You can use the UAE mail tracking to see the status earlier. However you will often get the package "package not received by emerates post" for about 7-10 days on average. Then it will appear and from there it usually is at JFK within 3-5 days.Ok thanks. I got an LX number. Ends with AE.
Been 4 days for me. I’m expecting to wait 7 before I get a reply.Think you could reply to my email when you have the chance?
paid and sent confirmation yesterday morning and still haven't heard back with anything ^^
I have found that Nebivolol is a great add on BP meds with low sides. It does the BP thing well. However in terms of lowering heart rate, at least for me it does very little. It is a beta blocker but seems to not work the same as many others do.sa
I was using nebivolol (US pharma) but wasn’t getting much result. Also my K+ was getting high using ARB + BB. For me the ivabradine is just way more effective and seems to effect nothing other than RHR. I do know the prescribing indications, this is obviously somewhat of an off-label use.
It doesn’t seem very popular these days but I actually prefer good old propranolol as a BB for prn use, mainly for the calming CNS effect lacking in the newer cardioselective beta blockers. BBs are also now delegated to adjuncts for treatment of hypertension, as you likely know. ARB (or ACE inhibitor) first, Ca channel blocker or diuretic second/third, then BB is what most recently trained cardiologists typically prescribe.
He usually responds in 24-48 hours max. Assuming the right email address and you aren't asking him anything inappropriate.This source do not reach back via email, is he currently not operating or does he usually take long?
This source do not reach back via email, is he currently not operating or does he usually take long?
We demand 24/7 365 access! I sent money and didn't get instant delivery via a drone to my doorstep I must be getting scammed! (Please note: this is all satire)Give people a break on the weekend guys..![]()
For sure, but I was responding to your mention of HR being a significant concern rather than hypertension strictly.sa
I was using nebivolol (US pharma) but wasn’t getting much result. Also my K+ was getting high using ARB + BB. For me the ivabradine is just way more effective and seems to effect nothing other than RHR. I do know the prescribing indications, this is obviously somewhat of an off-label use.
It doesn’t seem very popular these days but I actually prefer good old propranolol as a BB for prn use, mainly for the calming CNS effect lacking in the newer cardioselective beta blockers. BBs are also now delegated to adjuncts for treatment of hypertension, as you likely know. ARB (or ACE inhibitor) first, Ca channel blocker or diuretic second/third, then BB is what most recently trained cardiologists typically prescribe.
Yes sir just replied to your message on telegram@PCT24X7 PHARMACY messaged you on Telegram brother is that still an ok method of communication?
Nebivolol seems to have little effect on my blood pressure/RHR , I started at 5mg and increased to 10mg without much change. I don't believe it is from excessive parasympathetic tone, as I use Reta @ 4mg/wk (in 3 divided doses), but more from an exaggerated sympathetic response to stress.For sure, but I was responding to your mention of HR being a significant concern rather than hypertension strictly.
Nothing wrong with liking propanalol, it just has its trade-offs. For people like the other person in this thread who report little-to-no benefit from Nebivolol, this tends to be more common in people who lean heavily parasympathetic, while propanalol is always going to be far more powerful for CNS calming in any circumstance.
Agreed. I have used both for long runs. Az is a fraction stronger overall, but it is not enough to make any real benefit to myself. Most independent studies show the same. Basically, yea it lowers it a bit more, but it is not really statically significant in most people.Nebivolol seems to have little effect on my blood pressure/RHR , I started at 5mg and increased to 10mg without much change. I don't believe it is from excessive parasympathetic tone, as I use Reta @ 4mg/wk (in 3 divided doses), but more from an exaggerated sympathetic response to stress.
I used to have severe occasional vagal episodes (typically triggered by acute stress) where my BP and heart rate would both tank, and I'd go down hard for 15-20 min at a time; those ceased since initiating androgen therapy, interestingly.
Cilnidipine with its N-CC blocking just seems to be far more effective for me than Nebivolol, and I believed via it is also is superior in terms of renoprotective effects and blood pressure control compared to beta blockers. Agree propranolol is best used for anxiety/calming, and not as a BP medication although it can help with that too.
I will have both both Cilnidipine/Telmisartan and Cilnidipine/Azilsartan (both 10/40) on hand by end of month, thanks @BP_6 and @Photon for the heads up. Azilsartan 40/80 are also available individually, and price is about a third of what I current pay through the USA manufacturer program ($150 for 3-mo supply of the 80mgm tabs) for those with insurance that excludes it. I'm not sure any insurance covers it at this point as it is very expensive, and it's probably not that much more efficacious than telmisartan other than the longer AT1 active time; telmisartan is a better PPARγ activator, but still weak compared to dedicated drugs ie TZDs.
Apparently there will be a new PCT247 price list in a week or two with azilsartan and its various combo pills all added.
Nebivolol seems to have little effect on my blood pressure/RHR , I started at 5mg and increased to 10mg without much change. I don't believe it is from excessive parasympathetic tone, as I use Reta @ 4mg/wk (in 3 divided doses), but more from an exaggerated sympathetic response to stress.
I used to have severe occasional vagal episodes (typically triggered by acute stress) where my BP and heart rate would both tank, and I'd go down hard for 15-20 min at a time; those ceased since initiating androgen therapy, interestingly.
Cilnidipine with its N-CC blocking just seems to be far more effective for me than Nebivolol, and I believed via it is also is superior in terms of renoprotective effects and blood pressure control compared to beta blockers. Agree propranolol is best used for anxiety/calming, and not as a BP medication although it can help with that too.
I will have both both Cilnidipine/Telmisartan and Cilnidipine/Azilsartan (both 10/40) on hand by end of month, thanks @BP_6 and @Photon for the heads up. Azilsartan 40/80 are also available individually, and price is about a third of what I current pay through the USA manufacturer program ($150 for 3-mo supply of the 80mgm tabs) for those with insurance that excludes it. I'm not sure any insurance covers it at this point as it is very expensive, and it's probably not that much more efficacious than telmisartan other than the longer AT1 active time; telmisartan is a better PPARγ activator, but still weak compared to dedicated drugs ie TZDs.
Apparently there will be a new PCT247 price list in a week or two with azilsartan and its various combo pills all added.
Agreed. I have used both for long runs. Az is a fraction stronger overall, but it is not enough to make any real benefit to myself. Most independent studies show the same. Basically, yea it lowers it a bit more, but it is not really statically significant in most people.
Then when you compare the cost and the better PPARy effects, Tele probably comes out a single footstep ahead in the dash unless getting your numbers down as low as you possibly can above all else is all you care about.
