I told them which products send me.By offloading some other product they could not sell to you..and making you pay extra shipping for it?
Btw if you want to see them in a bad way just don't order jeez..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I told them which products send me.By offloading some other product they could not sell to you..and making you pay extra shipping for it?
Well sucks because raws are sold out, but as promised here are the janos on my messed up first home brew. 27g of test e into 100ml of carrier oil.
So basically the raws I recieved are close to 100% purity
Each gram creates 1ml of volume, so what i ended up with was 127ml of total oil. My goal was 270mg per ml but that would have required dumping 27g in 73ml of oil to make a total of 100ml for 270mg/mlif you finally have 100ml and use 27gr
that is 10ml whith 2.7gr
or 1ml with 270mg
but you have 1ml whith 214mg , so: review yours maths
And you are a source? LOL hope your clients do math better than you xDEach gram creates 1ml of volume, so what i ended up with was 127ml of total oil. My goal was 270mg per ml but that would have required dumping 27g in 73ml of oil to make a total of 100ml for 270mg/ml
Was a rookie mistake forgetting that raws have volume and displacement is a thing lol
Lol I don't rsell gear, it was a test run for just HRT stuff but ya know, no raws so I need the test for me for now. Mostly just sell GLP1s and ancillary medsAnd you are a source? LOL hope your clients do math better than you xD
Would it truly have been so difficult to simply add oil until reaching the desired total volume? One can clearly see the marking on the beaker.Each gram creates 1ml of volume, so what i ended up with was 127ml of total oil. My goal was 270mg per ml but that would have required dumping 27g in 73ml of oil to make a total of 100ml for 270mg/ml
Was a rookie mistake forgetting that raws have volume and displacement is a thing lol
look at all these new sources, brewing test 250 at 280.......and the said to us: the Tecnician this... the tecnician that........you right it is no so hard te reach the good concentration, yes the raw can be 90% or 95% pure but that not justify 280mg/mlWould it truly have been so difficult to simply add oil until reaching the desired total volume? One can clearly see the marking on the beaker.
Well like I said, rookie error from excitement. I never claimed to be an expert brewer. Still got plenty left to correct my error for next time and I also know what to put in to get a bit above 250mg/ml. I was overshooting it in the event of it being maybe 95 or 96% raws.Would it truly have been so difficult to simply add oil until reaching the desired total volume? One can clearly see the marking on the beaker.
Are you going to tell us what you are getting in stock first? Are should we send the rep a wish list of all the untested low purity raws we’ve ever wanted to own?Hello everyone,
There will be a good news on May 6th. You can forward your order list to your rep in advance, so that we can know the estimated demand for the production. Please don't ask us if we have them right now, we can't tell more details.
First batch will be shipped to the pre-order customers.
Thank you very much.
Hello everyone,
There will be a good news on May 6th. You can forward your order list to your rep in advance, so that we can know the estimated demand for the production. Please don't ask us if we have them right now, we can't tell more details.
First batch will be shipped to the pre-order customers.
Thank you very much.
If I were one of those folks at AASraw, I’d totally stash a bit of the good raw, send it off for testing, say it’s from the new batch, and boom—you’d all be happy 'cause you got your precious lab results. Then I’d go ahead and sell you a bunch of garbage raw—mwahaha! Nah, just kidding (or am I?). What you should do is buy the raw, get it tested, and then—with the proof in hand—shut their operation down like a boss.The last time you sold "new" stock, it actually was old low purity stock.
Are you doing any Jano testing this time round or no testing as usual??
If I were one of those folks at AASraw, I’d totally stash a bit of the good raw, send it off for testing, say it’s from the new batch, and boom—you’d all be happy 'cause you got your precious lab results. Then I’d go ahead and sell you a bunch of garbage raw—mwahaha! Nah, just kidding (or am I?). What you should do is buy the raw, get it tested, and then—with the proof in hand—shut their operation down like a boss.
I didn't know these guys sold bad raws to anybody,I thought seizures were the issue not quality,I could have sworn all the jano testing came back great. There must be raws that people got that were bad and they never reported it on here, because I can't figure why else people would be busting there Balls so bad.I have been seeing nothing but good reviews about them lately.. I wish I could figure out what's really up, I was actually going to give them a shotI told them which products send me.
Btw if you want to see them in a bad way just don't order jeez..
Nobody's received anything from these guys that tested under 90% have they? I thought the main issue was there shipping practices, and alot of
I didn't know these guys sold bad raws to anybody,I thought seizures were the issue not quality,I could have sworn all the jano testing came back great. There must be raws that people got that were bad and they never reported it on here, because I can't figure why else people would be busting there Balls so bad.I have been seeing nothing but good reviews about them lately.. I wish I could figure out what's really up, I was actually going to give them a shot
I received the "new batch" which tested as bad as the "old batch".
Not sure what Jano testing you saw for these guys tho..
So you received and tested something that tested as it previously did? If I’m looking to purchase something I go off the recent testing and base my decision off that. Sounds like you were obviously hoping for better but should have been prepared for it to test the same as it previously did. Am I understanding this correctly?
