yes that's needed or the HPLC machine could breakThat's very interesting.
Do you mean Janoshik filters prior to performing HPLC?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes that's needed or the HPLC machine could breakThat's very interesting.
Do you mean Janoshik filters prior to performing HPLC?
Thanks!yes that's needed or the HPLC machine could break
Reduced prices, elongated shipping timeWe reduced the price of some products. I hope you like it
Discord:加入 Discord 服务器 Sigma Audley!Code:https://privatebin.net/?bc70ade1bfa87f73#EtQC7MGKchQeaE1Pxj9NgDeX7qxLP9zRVwp4qsGytyS7
Telegram:Sigma Audley(SSA)
That's very interesting.
Do you mean Janoshik filters prior to performing HPLC?
Even if they say yes, they will still pull an "oh no I make mistake, Out of stock Dear friend. Do you want refund or we ship from China warehouse for free..." (of which that transport cost was already baked into the domestic warehouse price)Is the US warehouse stocked yet with GLP's?
Yes.Friend, is that the one with flip off writing on the top?
This may be a stupid question, but does this mean we should be filtering our Peps after reconstitution before pinning?All labs filter prior to liquid chromatography to prevent clogging up the machine.
However, this issue is mainly a concern for peptides, because few people filter them after reconstitution, while AAS are .22um filtered as part of the brewing process, so you're getting the same purity level seen after HPLC,
Pharma, FDA, and academics analyze peptide purity using multiple methods to get around this limitation. It's called "orthogonal analysis", something the FDA has required of peptide/protein based drugs for a long time.
Jano will offer this in the future.
you sir have an "Astute grasp for the obvious " ,,This may be a stupid question, but does this mean we should be filtering our Peps after reconstitution before pinning?
There’s a gigantic debate about that, please use search for your researchThis may be a stupid question, but does this mean we should be filtering our Peps after reconstitution before pinning?
There’s a gigantic debate about that, please use search for your research
It’s definitely debatable. Not with you of course. You have a one track mind that sees contaminates and aggregates behind every closed door. But regular users of peptides who have never filtered anything for years and never had any issues would say the need to filter is debatable.There's really nothing to debate.
It's only a matter of whether someone gives a shit or not.
Filtering doesn't increase harm, and, unless someone lives in a fantasy world where they believe vials of Chinese UGL peptides are carefully produced to pharma like standards, filtering reduces risk.
Plenty of people smoke cigarettes, reuse syringes, etc for years and don't experience any problems. Others filter their drinking water, choose organic food, use sunscreen, etc.
Just a matter of risk tolerance.
He literally said it only matters if you give a shit or not. I choose to eat organic, you might not. Nothing to debate.It’s definitely debatable. Not with you of course. You have a one track mind that sees contaminates and aggregates behind every closed door. But regular users of peptides who have never filtered anything for years and never had any issues would say the need to filter is debatable.
It’s definitely debatable. Not with you of course. You have a one track mind that sees contaminates and aggregates behind every closed door. But regular users of peptides who have never filtered anything for years and never had any issues would say the need to filter is debatable.
That’s where you and he are wrong. Not filtering doesn’t mean you don’t give a shit. The choice to filter is a choice based on risk tolerance. If I truly thought a peptide was going to cause me harm I’d filter it every time. So in reality I do give a shit. There’s just no real world evidence that people are being harmed from not filtering.He literally said it only matters if you give a shit or not. I choose to eat organic, you might not. Nothing to debate.
Again smoking is a stupid (I’ll be nice and call it weak) comparison. 600k people die of cancer annually. There is plenty of real world, textbook, and laboratory proof that it’s deadly. I know you want people to believe unfiltered peptides are dangerous and you are here to save the day. But people have been using unfiltered peptides for decades with no issues. Nobody is dropping dead. Hell, even if there is some immune response it’s usually minor and passes. All the experts in the world, all the books written on peptides, and none mention filtering. But somehow you’ve got it all figured out. You are not an expert. You are not a licensed professional. You do not have a degree in any topic you preach on Meso. You are just a guy who knows how to use ChatGPT and sometimes properly interpret what you are reading.What's not debateable is whether filtering causes harm. It doesn't.
The entire pharma industry and its regulators are concerned about aggregates and particulate trash being kept out of injectable drugs. If you think they're just not as "common sense smart" as users of UGL peptides made by our safety focused Chinese suppliers that's your choice. I don't give a fuck.
You're an example of the "My grandfather smoked 2 packs a day from 15 to 90 and never took a sick day" so smoking is "fine" type of mentality.
On Monday my sales rep Bella agreed to a reship of the missing items. Haven't heard anything since.2 week t/a between payment and the last package arriving to the US. But my order from their oils and tablets warehouse is missing 7 out of the 8 items I purchased...
I'll keep you guys posted.
Your "don't worry dear friend" is loading...Just placed another order with Tansy. Super easy payment via BTC on a Friday and tracking number sent to me on Monday. Already planning next order
