QuadFather
Member
Don’t go by a scale go by the mirrorStarted a cut with 300mg test c and 200mg tren e, Gained 2 pounds, I think I'm going in the wrong direction.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t go by a scale go by the mirrorStarted a cut with 300mg test c and 200mg tren e, Gained 2 pounds, I think I'm going in the wrong direction.
I took a 2 pound shit this morning.Started a cut with 300mg test c and 200mg tren e, Gained 2 pounds, I think I'm going in the wrong direction.
Totally normal, man. Anytime you jump into a new cycle or come off a cruise and bump up the test - weight almost always spikes a bit. Happens to me every time. Could be water, glycogen, inflammation, or just your muscles saying “oh hey, we’re back in business.”Started a cut with 300mg test c and 200mg tren e, Gained 2 pounds, I think I'm going in the wrong direction.
Were you doing testosterone before? If not, could be just water.Started a cut with 300mg test c and 200mg tren e, Gained 2 pounds, I think I'm going in the wrong direction.
Ya I was doing 500 test, 200 primo, 100 decaWere you doing testosterone before? If not, could be just water.
That’s a hefty dose and long ester for first time trying tren. Usually you want a short ester and start real low to see how you respond.Will do I went straight from that cycle to cut so could be residuals from my bulk. I'll give it a month and adjust accordingly. First time trying tren to so not sure how my body will handle it
200 tren a week is not a lotThat’s a hefty dose and long ester for first time trying tren. Usually you want a short ester and start real low to see how you respond.
LOL Tren has an anabolic rating of 500! Test is at 100. 200mg/wk may as well be a gram of test smh.200 tren a week is not a lot
That’s ummm..not how it worksLOL Tren has an anabolic rating of 500! Test is at 100. 200mg/wk may as well be a gram of test smh.
Please enlighten me, my google degree only takes me so far. What did I say that is factually incorrect? Serious question, no snark.That’s ummm..not how it works
He said that the difference of nitrogen retention between a rats prostate and its muscle, that was established in the 1950s, is not an efficient way to accurately measure the real impact to skeletal muscle enhancement an aas produces.Please enlighten me, my google degree only takes me so far. What did I say that is factually incorrect? Serious question, no snark.
You baby just say it’s like taking a gram of test, that’s what he meant because it’s not how it works. You don’t just “multiply”I believe you are referring to a study done in the 1960's since Tren was first made in 1963. The prostate was measuring androgen-sensitive tissue to give part of the ratio of anabolic : androgen. While the Lavator Ani Assay was measuring skeletal muscle to reflect anabolic activity. I get every lab derived study has limitations since animal studies do not always translate in the real-world performance. Perhaps that's what was meant by "that's not how it works."
Had a recent order through Stand, it would have landed in 3 days, but all shipping sometimes have been shit latelyAbout 2 days. Some post office delay warnings out there, but around 2 days to get out the door.
This. lol, it’s not a linear “oh it’s this many times more anabolic/androgenic than test so taking x grams of substance a is like x grams of test”. Nothing in the real world works like that. There are many, many factors. I suppose you probably know this, just are arguing for arguments sake. No, I don’t know all the scientific terms, but yes I do know how things actually pan out. And that’s not it. Just like 500mg of test will not have the same effect or give the same bloodwork to two different people.You baby just say it’s like taking a gram of test, that’s what he meant because it’s not how it works. You don’t just “multiply”
