MESO-Rx Sponsor STANFORD PHARMA PUBLIC SALE 10/24/21

Stan your shipping is GENIUS. I can’t decide whether you trained Good Lyfe, or if you actually are Good Lyfe and that was just a pseudonym for your other business. They vacuum sealed their packages, but yours are sealed in the must genius way with your resealable pouches.

Thanks again my man. You are

THE BEST.

EVER.
 
I've always read that good/real GH shouldn't ever dissolve instantly. That if it doesn't it's a good sign of quality. Just gently tip it and spin the vial to aide in it fully dissolving, and don't shake it.
 
Tired Tv Land GIF by TV Land Classic





 
Last edited:
The bubbles are a non factor. It's not due to exipients. It's from the water splashing into the product. Here are some more pics with adding bac water slower. Took pic before adding bac water. Took pic right after, before dissolving to show no bubbles from start to finish. Last pic is about 3 minutes later after dissolving with product completely dissolved and no bubbles.
 
The bubbles are a non factor. It's not due to exipients. It's from the water splashing into the product. Here are some more pics with adding bac water slower. Took pic before adding bac water. Took pic right after, before dissolving to show no bubbles from start to finish. Last pic is about 3 minutes later after dissolving with product completely dissolved and no bubbles.

Gentle reconstitution is an absolute must. I think the wrong message got out at some point about how some tests confirmed it was nonsense. Definately not.
 
The bubbles are a non factor. It's not due to exipients. It's from the water splashing into the product. Here are some more pics with adding bac water slower. Took pic before adding bac water. Took pic right after, before dissolving to show no bubbles from start to finish. Last pic is about 3 minutes later after dissolving with product completely dissolved and no bubbles.
Thank you for following up @Stanfordpharma1. Perhaps someone can also confirm same behavior when using 0.9% BA Hospira bac water.

Great to reinforce that if using the proper technique there should be no bubbles generated during reconstitution period.

Appreciate your efforts to educate your customers on this. Best.
 
@Stanfordpharma1
If your bac water is this pure, I can only imagine the legendary bathwater drops you occasionally bless the lucky few with. Id pay top dollar for just one since it could take my recovery to god-tier levels. imagine, a single drop hitting the skin, sending shivers through the nervous system, veins expanding, heart racing, pure euphoria!
 
If you guys make me reconstitute one more vial you will force me to go on an hgh cycle as to not waste.
If it means getting to the bottom of this then it is worth it. I'll happily reimburse you for the kit.

No reason someone should be getting bubbles or a cloudy solution if they are carefully reconstituting the GH as per pharma recommendations with the wall irrigation method and 0.9% Hospira bac water. There should be no other plausible mechanism other than improper reconstitution by "jetting" the water directly onto the puck. Agreed?


0.8 vs 0.9% BA bac water? No difference for reconstition if your technique is proper. Come on guys. If there is, let's clearly get to the bottom of this so it's clear for readers later. Get it? Ahem, clear.
 
Last edited:
If it means getting to the bottom of this then it is worth it. I'll happily reimburse you for the kit.

No reason someone should be getting bubbles or a cloudy solution if they are carefully reconstituting the GH as per pharma recommendations with the wall irrigation method and 0.9% Hospira bac water. There should be no other plausible mechanism other than improper reconstitution by "jetting" the water directly onto the puck. Agreed?


0.8 vs 0.9% BA bac water? No difference for reconstition if your technique is proper. Come on guys. If there is, let's clearly get to the bottom of this so it's clear for readers later. Get it? Ahem, clear.
I disagree in the fact that their bac water may be over the .9% and that's what is causing the issues. There is a allowable variance and if their batch is 1% or more this can cause the cloudiness. I found this by testing the issue a few years back. That's the only thing I may disagree with. This is why I new it was the issue before I reconstituted the vial yesterday. I don't mind the wasted product to determine this. As long as I get my flowers for discovering this. Maybe even by giving this a name like "the Stanford anomoly" or something, lol.

That being said, I Tested product and came back really good, I answered the cloudiness question and now the bubbles question. I gotta ask... what's next? The product is good.

I didn't plan on using product and was only answering the cloudiness question, so wasn't concerned with "slowly" adding bac water. Now the bubbles became an issue so I slowly added water. I'm doing my best to answer the questions, right? Happy to do so. I respect what you and ghoul do for the community and am happy to help if it's what's best for everyone.

Sorry if any of this comes as being forward or rude. Just typing fast and busy as heck so not putting a lot into what's being said or proof reading or anything.
 
@Stanfordpharma1
If your bac water is this pure, I can only imagine the legendary bathwater drops you occasionally bless the lucky few with. Id pay top dollar for just one since it could take my recovery to god-tier levels. imagine, a single drop hitting the skin, sending shivers through the nervous system, veins expanding, heart racing, pure euphoria!
Stanford onlyfans. Watch me bathe, bottle and pack for shipping. 10ml vials, lol.
 
I disagree in the fact that their bac water may be over the .9% and that's what is causing the issues. There is a allowable variance and if their batch is 1% or more this can cause the cloudiness.
I am grateful we were able to decouple the cloudiness issue from the bubbles. I have no data to disprove your >1% BA hypothesis on the cloudiness issue and appreciate you taking the time to share your observations and data.

I found this by testing the issue a few years back. That's the only thing I may disagree with. This is why I new it was the issue before I reconstituted the vial yesterday. I don't mind the wasted product to determine this. As long as I get my flowers for discovering this. Maybe even by giving this a name like "the Stanford anomoly" or something, lol.

Here are your flowers for working so diligently to resolve these questions for members. My offer stands and appreciate you.

That being said, I Tested product and came back really good, I answered the cloudiness question and now the bubbles question. I gotta ask... what's next? The product is good.

Nothing next as far as I can tell. The idea that >=1% BA water can cause enough aggregation (or whatever is happening) to cause the cloudiness is an interesting one and just another experiment to add to the list for testing to see if Jano can pick up the cloudiness on his "dimer and related proteins" test.
I didn't plan on using product and was only answering the cloudiness question, so wasn't concerned with "slowly" adding bac water. Now the bubbles became an issue so I slowly added water. I'm doing my best to answer the questions, right?

You absolutely are and now members can be confident they should not be seeing bubbles when reconstituting properly. Thank you.

Happy to do so. I respect what you and ghoul do for the community and am happy to help if it's what's best for everyone.

Sorry if any of this comes as being forward or rude. Just typing fast and busy as heck so not putting a lot into what's being said or proof reading or anything.

Best wishes to you Stan and we can DM about the reimbursement. Thanks again for your time.
 
Back
Top