The difference between us then is I think the standard for sterility should be there just like it is for HPLC. A simple feedback loop just like HPLC. Basic quality control.That's just disingenuous. With my education? If you put any value in that statement and had an ability to self-reflect, you would be asking yourself if you're putting too much stock into your position on sterility.
My opinion is the gear is sterile. 0.22 um seems to do the trick. There are not systematic reports of abscesses by, for example, everyone using a particular batch. And it's been like this for decades.
There are no abscesses until there is one. There's enough guys stabbing themselves without knowing the first thing about a sterile field. If we know a simple solution to prevent abscesses from shit gear then we should use it, right? Any vendor caught cheating the new standard should be banished and shunned by the customers. If you are going to have a potency standard you gotta have a sterility standard as well..
I'm sure 10 years ago folks thought the HPLC standard was nanny state. I haven't looked too closely. Who wants to take all the mystery out of what they are injecting? Tren, mast? Fuck, who cares? I'll take door #2 Monty.
Anyway thanks for your response.
Last edited:

