Like a petulant child you just can't be put to sleep lol.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like a petulant child you just can't be put to sleep lol.



I'm rubber, you're glue.You're a dumbfuxk. A tool, a fool.
Yes, NATO bombed Kosovo from 24 March 1999 to 10 June 1999, so 47 days. Then UN peacekeepers went in and kept the peace, policed the area. And that's ancient history. The next time NATO has an offensive campaign you can bitch all you want but NATO in Ukraine is purely defensive now - not a single weapon given that an hit Moscow, Ukraine has had to modify a couple old Soviet drones to hit Russian airfields occasionally. So you need to bitch about Russia, the one who invaded, now or forever become a hypocrite."NATO as an organization has had a couple small bombing campaigns in Yugoslavia and Libya (UN resolutions 713 and 1973) but other than that nothing offensive". - quote from a lying bitch calls himself @hometeam
props for properly using grotesque as a nounA despicable grotesque of inconceivable stupidity.
Yes, NATO bombed Kosovo from 24 March 1999 to 10 June 1999, so 47 days. Then UN peacekeepers went in and kept the peace, policed the area. And that's ancient history. The next time NATO has an offensive campaign you can bitch all you want but NATO in Ukraine is purely defensive now - not a single weapon given that an hit Moscow, Ukraine has had to modify a couple old Soviet drones to hit Russian airfields occasionally. So you need to bitch about Russia, the one who invaded, now or forever become a hypocrite.
You don't get to run around saying NATO committed atrocities 20 years ago and is terrible for doing what the international community wanted but Russia was provoked and what they're doing is right now today as we speak (killing 8,300 to 33,407 civilians) is acceptable without being called out for it.
Yeah and we've never seen you condemning Russia when they do it. This was just this morning:Biden escalating war in somalia.
Because, you know, it's all about peace. Especially after the US state department coups.
Perpetual war, all over the world, all the time.
And the stupid bastard hometeam cheers.
![]()
US Launches More Airstrikes in Somalia - News From Antiwar.com
US Africa Command on Sunday said it launched two airstrikes in Somalia this month that targeted al-Shabaab fighters in support of the US-backed Mogadishu-based government. One strike took place on December 14, about 109 miles northeast of Mogadishu near the coastal town of Cadale. AFRICOM...news.antiwar.com
Yeah and we've never seen you condemning Russia when they do it. This was just this morning:
![]()
Russian drones strike Kyiv's power grid in third attack in a week
Russia attacked Ukraine with dozens of "kamikaze" drones in the early hours of Monday as people slept, hitting critical infrastructure in and around Kyiv in Moscow's third air attack on the Ukrainian capital in less than a week.www.reuters.com
But it's no big deal because big bad Biden made them do it, right? Those missile defense systems we sent them which claimed to have shot down 30 of the 35 drones are grotesque and wretched, disgusting and stupid. Right?
The Somalian airstrikes were on al-Shabaab, which the US has indeed been at war with since they pledged allegiance to al-Queda. Or are you trying to bring up stuff from 20+ years ago again and trying to say "what Russia is doing is ok because look at what the US did many years ago."?Lmfao.
Russian drones striking Ukrainian power plants during an active war, is the same thing as NATO bombing thousands of civilians intentionally with no provocation whatsoever?
What a dumbass
The Somalian airstrikes were on al-Shabaab, which the US has indeed been at war with since they pledged allegiance to al-Queda. Or are you trying to bring up stuff from 20+ years ago again and trying to say "what Russia is doing is ok because look at what the US did many years ago."?
You're recommending a book from The Libertarian Institute, written by its director. Do you honestly think this would be unbiased or of enough academic/educational value to be issued in any college setting? (I checked, it's not.)Try this, it's a book they'll read to you, and it's free.



You're recommending a book from The Libertarian Institute, written by its director. Do you honestly think this would be unbiased or of enough academic/educational value to be issued in any college setting? (I checked, it's not.)
This is straight from their website:
View attachment 176942
View attachment 176940
View attachment 176941
You're criticizing me, a college educated guy, and Dr Michael Scally, for not reading enough books and being "dumb fuks" yet the ones you're reading are pure garbage, proudly admits to being political propaganda meant for an activism agenda, and only tells you what you want to hear as someone who agrees with the libertarian view - nothing else.
The author of your book is just some libertarian talk show host who has no credentials whatsoever.I guess you're afraid of the facts then.
Because facts don't change irregardless of who tells them.
That authors research is impeccable, his book is well written and factually accurate.
That's the problem with you "educated idiots" , you think you're smarter than everyone else, and your not.
It's not going to hurt you to hear an opposing view.
You just might realize how stupid you've been in this matter and what this this is all really about.
$
You're recommending a book from The Libertarian Institute, written by its director. Do you honestly think this would be unbiased or of enough academic/educational value to be issued in any college setting? (I checked, it's not.)
This is straight from their website:
View attachment 176942
View attachment 176940
View attachment 176941
You're criticizing me, a college educated guy, and Dr Michael Scally, for not reading enough books and being "dumb fuks" yet the ones you're reading are pure garbage, proudly admits to being political propaganda meant for an activism agenda, and only tells you what you want to hear as someone who agrees with the libertarian view - nothing else.
The author of your book is just some libertarian talk show host who has no credentials whatsoever.
If you really want to learn about geopolitics Alexander Stubb will be releasing a book called "Order in a World of Disorder" and he was Finland's Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and is now Director and Professor of the School of Transnational Governance at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy.
He's actually met Putin and negotiated peace talks with the Russians/Georgians, has a BA degree in political science from Furman University in South Carolina, has a MA degree in political science (european affairs) from the College of Europe in Belgium, and has a PhD degree in international politics from the London School of Economics and Political Science.
He talks about his upcoming book here:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7M50JGio5Q
He says the three thesis will be:
1. In the coming years a multipolar world will be led by 3 powers: China, the US, and EU who make up over 50% of world GDP and who will be challenged by an array of states, regions and non-state actors. No single center will dominate global politics.
2. China and the US will be the main rivals, they will compete but not fall into conflict and the EU will side with the US on most issues.
3.The new world order will be determined by the different power center's ability to project a combination hard, soft and smart power.
It's not a book you will read because you'd rather read libertarian trash that ignores the reality of globalism, promotes the abolishment of most (if not all) of the state and federal governments, and advocates for world powers having no involvement in geopolitics or pursuing their interests throughout the world whatsoever. That's a cause that's just not going to happen, especially after being attacked on 9/11 and especially with Russia wanting to annex European/Eurasian states.
That's why the title of the book is "Order in a World of Disorder." Would you rather have an orderly world or a disorderly one with the chaos that brings?In other words, you completely support the "new world order" and refuse to research the truth and history of these events because it contradicts your own ideals of globalist empire of billionaire corporate interests.
The author of your book is just some libertarian talk show host who has no credentials whatsoever.
If you really want to learn about geopolitics Alexander Stubb will be releasing a book called "Order in a World of Disorder" and he was Finland's Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and is now Director and Professor of the School of Transnational Governance at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy.
He's actually met Putin and negotiated peace talks with the Russians/Georgians, has a BA degree in political science from Furman University in South Carolina, has a MA degree in political science (european affairs) from the College of Europe in Belgium, and has a PhD degree in international politics from the London School of Economics and Political Science.
He talks about his upcoming book here:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7M50JGio5Q
He says the three thesis will be:
1. In the coming years a multipolar world will be led by 3 powers: China, the US, and EU who make up over 50% of world GDP and who will be challenged by an array of states, regions and non-state actors. No single center will dominate global politics.
2. China and the US will be the main rivals, they will compete but not fall into conflict and the EU will side with the US on most issues.
3.The new world order will be determined by the different power center's ability to project a combination hard, soft and smart power.
It's not a book you will read because you'd rather read libertarian trash that ignores the reality of globalism, promotes the abolishment of most (if not all) of the state and federal governments, and advocates for world powers having no involvement in geopolitics or pursuing their interests throughout the world whatsoever. That's a cause that's just not going to happen, especially after being attacked on 9/11 and especially with Russia wanting to annex European/Eurasian states.
