Source wants me to ship a product back?

[MFAAS]

The other option was to make a film destroying it anything but keeping both product and money, that is all. I don't want to have the feeling of being taking for a foul that is all!

OK @flasspass123 why didnt you just send him a video of you destroying the product? That seems reasonable me...just hit the vial with a hammer and video it. What is the problem?

I wouldn't be down wit shipping something back, even domestic. Personally. I was going right ask why can't you sent him a video of you destroying it but then saw his post right there saying that is any option. I say do that and stop the whining lol. Just get it over with and you can get your new product!

 

[effswithtren]

I’ve fucking had it with sources trying to reframe customers bringing issues to light as “outing them” or “going public”. Transparency of sources and their dealings is a good thing, and falls under harm reduction. Any source that tries to keep their questionable behavior from being known doesn’t belong on this board imo.

 

[flasspass123]

OK @flasspass123 why didnt you just send him a video of you destroying the product? That seems reasonable me...just hit the vial with a hammer and video it. What is the problem?

I wouldn't be down wit shipping something back, even domestic. Personally. I was going right ask why can't you sent him a video of you destroying it but then saw his post right there saying that is any option. I say do that and stop the whining lol. Just get it over with and you can get your new product!

This was just recently suggested by another user in his thread. He did not initially suggest this option, but I can send a video no problem.

 

[MadBret]

This was just recently suggested by another user in his thread. He did not initially suggest this option, but I can send a video no problem.

This sounds reasonable to me.

 

[pharmacist]

I’ve fucking had it with sources trying to reframe customers bringing issues to light as “outing them” or “going public”. Transparency of sources and their dealings is a good thing, and falls under harm reduction. Any source that tries to keep their questionable behavior from being known doesn’t belong on this board imo.

Absolutely agree with you! I posted the issue myself in my thread before this thread appeared.
I have no problem being transparent, of course as long as privacy is kept regarding personal data.

 

[pharmacist]

This was just recently suggested by another user in his thread. He did not initially suggest this option, but I can send a video no problem.

Its in PM. I told you my guy will destroy it.
Before issue went public.

 

[Drexyl]

I can see both sides on this one, myself? I would go the destroy it myself option then take a refund or a proper reship. That's fair and safe for both parties in my opinion, I would never risk sending a product back, it's dicey enough receiving them sometimes.

 

[Deleted member 127229]

I would absolutely NEVER ship anything to anyone. I can’t believe this source would even suggest that…

In the past when other sources have shipped me the wrong or damaged order I simply send them a pic and they re-ship it no questions asked. Why should it be a policy you even need to film yourself destroying it? The source fucked up the order they should take the loss no matter the circumstances.

I’ll avoid any source that suggest I get involved in their vending by shipping shit to random people for them. Totally unacceptable

 

[Drexyl]

Agreed, but again I see both sides. I'm willing to bet there's many more unscrupulous customers than there are vendors. Here in the US there's the whole "Customer is always right" motto, honestly I say fuck that. And it's certainly not the motto everywhere. Vendor from the beginning said he'd reship, he just didn't want to feel like he's being taken advantage of. It's just my opinion that counts for absolutely nothing, and I'm not saying the OP was trying to take advantage, but show proof of either inferior product quality or it being destroyed due to suspicion of bad shipping protocol. That's fair to all. We're not buying apricots from our local grocery.

*I have no idea why I chose apricots.

 

[Deleted member 127229]

Agreed, but again I see both sides. I'm willing to bet there's many more unscrupulous customers than there are vendors. Here in the US there's the whole "Customer is always right" motto, honestly I say fuck that. And it's certainly not the motto everywhere. Vendor from the beginning said he'd reship, he just didn't want to feel like he's being taken advantage of. It's just my opinion that counts for absolutely nothing, and I'm not saying the OP was trying to take advantage, but show proof of either inferior product quality or it being destroyed due to suspicion of bad shipping protocol. That's fair to all. We're not buying apricots from our local grocery.

*I have no idea why I chose apricots.

I’d certainly feel taken advantage of as a customer if a source wanted me to risk jail time by mailing prescription drugs to random ass people. I’d also feel taken advantage of if I paid for one thing and received an inadequate product that I cannot use. A simple picture should have had this all wrapped up in 5 minutes without suggesting the customer insert himself into the vendors business by shipping things to people. It’s also bad opsec to be providing customers with addresses to ship things.

 

[klokke23]

Its in PM. I told you my guy will destroy it.
Before issue went public.

Lol you made a fool out of yourself with this one. But please, keep going.

 

[pharmacist]

Lol you made a fool out of yourself with this one. But please, keep going.

Why is that, sir?

 

[pharmacist]

Anyway... Refund was done. I did my part. Lets see now
It wasn't about the money. Its about the principle. I have over 9 years of sourcing here without issues. You think I am fucking myself in the ass for 100 dollars? Its just I dont like when someone tries to take advantage of my good nature. That is all!!

 

[Theyedoctor]

The other option was to make a film destroying it anything but keeping both product and money, that is all. I don't want to have the feeling of being taking for a foul that is all!

And not to be shipped back intl. but to a donestic address not to involve customs.

Also, being threatened to go public if I wont refund without asking for product is not honourable. /)

Nope, you're 100% in the wrong.

Client asked if product would be shipped in ice. You said yes and took his $. You failed to come
Through.

So you either refund him or come through on your promise. What he does with the product shipped without ice is none of your business. It's your fuck up. He doesn't have to do anything to hold you accountable to fix your fuck up.

 

[1tank1]

Nope, you're 100% in the wrong.

Client asked if product would be shipped in ice. You said yes and took his $. You failed to come
Through.

So you either refund him or come through on your promise. What he does with the product shipped without ice is none of your business. It's your fuck up. He doesn't have to do anything to hold you accountable to fix your fuck up.

Unreasonable !!!
You're the exact type of customer the source is trying to avoid but keep his good rep with....and with good reason.

If you acted this way with me (if I was a source/which I'm not) when I was trying to be fair I would tell you to go fuck yourself ROFL.

Return (or destroy with proof ) is a good offer.

Take it or leave it and quit bitching.

 

[Andy024]

How long does an ice pack last, anyway? You said it was an international source, and I've had chocolate shipped to me domestically, two days later the dry ice in the insulated box had evaporated and I was left with a lump of molten chocolate.

 

[Fenrir51]

Sounds like your chocolate supplier doesn't know how to ship a fucking package to me.

 

[jJjburton]

A source wanted me to do the same. But they totally said if i dont, i dont get money back, so i lost the money kind of as i just kept the product. Even though it was the wrong product

 

[T&H]

A source wanted me to do the same. But they totally said if i dont, i dont get money back, so i lost the money kind of as i just kept the product. Even though it was the wrong product

Just name the source man. If you have nothing to lose, why keep this messed up situation to yourself. Better that the community here know the standards of a source they're buying from.

 

[Theyedoctor]

Unreasonable !!!
You're the exact type of customer the source is trying to avoid but keep his good rep with....and with good reason.

If you acted this way with me (if I was a source/which I'm not) when I was trying to be fair I would tell you to go fuck yourself ROFL.

Return (or destroy with proof ) is a good offer.

Take it or leave it and quit bitching.

Lmaooooooo keep his good rep with good reason? Agreeing to ship The source agreed to something and fucked up. His reputation is dog shit in my books.

What a salty loser both you and the source are. And don't worry, I'd never order from an idiot source that uses the word "honour" and then can't even keep his own word. Irony at its finest.

Maybe he'll give u a 5% discount for being the only person to defend his dumbass tho