2000 Mules / Election Documentary

[malfeasance]

Thank you for the explanation. My thing is that both sides have accused, and had reasonable proof, the other of voter fraud for years. Is it not possible that both sides cheat? Seems pretty coincidental that every time there’s fraud it’s just the winning team whether they be dem or republican.

Both sides obviously do cheat to some extent.

The question is whether this film presents good evidence of cheating that is being depicted, or even "proves" it as some are claiming.

The evidence appears to be mostly invented.

Hughinn is making claims about the film that the film does not even make.

Anyway, there are some serious issues with the film's evidence, and there are serious issues with the credibility of Gregg Phillips, who is the source of the evidence used in the film. But you would not know it to read the things being written here about the film.

These days folks just want to believe whatever they think supports their "side" of an issue. Most do not bother to try evaluating the evidence, a trait you can see on full display in this thread.

 

[Hughinn]

Both sides obviously do cheat to some extent.

The question is whether this film presents good evidence of cheating that is being depicted, or even "proves" it as some are claiming.

The evidence appears to be mostly invented.

Hughinn is making claims about the film that the film does not even make.

Anyway, there are some serious issues with the film's evidence, and there are serious issues with the credibility of Gregg Phillips, who is the source of the evidence used in the film. But you would not know it to read the things being written here about the film.

These days folks just want to believe whatever they think supports their "side" of an issue. Most do not bother to try evaluating the evidence, a trait you can see on full display in this thread.

The problem is your deliberate ignorance.

I've told you multiple times, these people weren't even pinged unless they visited at least 10 different drop boxes and 5 different collection sites. It's all there. If you want to see it, watch the documentary.

If you want to believe CNN that 2020 was "the most secure election in history" because Donald Trump lost, then go ahead.

I've already figured out, you're a goddamn fool. And that there is no proof... whatsoever. That you'd accept.

I mean if video proof of people wearing gloves, stuffing dozens of ballots and snapping selfie's while doing it, all while thier Geo cell phone trackers show them visiting multiple drop boxes in the early morning hours isn't good enough for you. Then god help your stupid ass.

Because that kind of evidence puts people on death row. Every day. It would put you in jail too. Whether you believe it or not.

You're clearly the dyed in blue type ignoramus jackass that isn't going to believe anything CNN doesn't tell him is real. Despite what his eyes can see.

You go ahead on with it. Believe whatever you want.

I know what I saw. It was voter fraud.
Mass mailing unsolicited ballots, drop boxes and no ID voting has to go.

That film proved that system was abused and led to voter fraud. Literally taped it.

I mean goddamn you're an idiot. Even liberal Atlanta times newspaper says,

"While it’s probable that some of the alleged perpetrators shown in the movie actually committed a crime, video surveillance of drop boxes alone doesn’t prove anything. Voters might have been delivering ballots for their relatives, which is allowed" - Atlanta Times. (Notice they don't say anything about visiting multiple drop boxes)

Nevertheless, Even honest leftwing outlets aren't denying fraud happened.

But you. Are a very special kind of stupid.
Congratulations.

 

[MFAAS]

Man, Cell location data simply is NOT ACCURATE enough to support this data. That is plain and simple.

If mm&&saw a video where a 911 call was made from inside a police station they literally couldn't triangulate the call. They thought the guy was across the street

Triangulation uses math to calucate the distance from a cell tower to ESTIMATE the distance between the device and the tower. We can do this because we know the speed at which the cellular waves travel. However, TONS of things affect this speed. Trees, fog, walls, interference from other cellular devices, windows, smoke, even your head as you hold the phone up to your head to talk.

If you watched the movie you know they arrested 2 gang members with the same 10 trillion pings that shot and killed an 8 year old girl. They used it to track the Jan 6th patriots and the 3 letter agencies use it. It gives details of the persons phone then they can follow you home.

Yes, it can be helpful data, especially when used in tandem with other data, since it is NEARLY useless on its own... Agencies and police attempt to use this data when they can. It works sometimes. Sometimes it leads to them breaking in to the wrong house and point a gun in an innocent man's face because, again, the data is not accurate to the degree necessary to actually pinpoint anyone's location.

Both sides obviously do cheat to some extent.

The question is whether this film presents good evidence of cheating that is being depicted, or even "proves" it as some are claiming.

The evidence appears to be mostly invented.

Hughinn is making claims about the film that the film does not even make.

Anyway, there are some serious issues with the film's evidence, and there are serious issues with the credibility of Gregg Phillips, who is the source of the evidence used in the film. But you would not know it to read the things being written here about the film.

These days folks just want to believe whatever they think supports their "side" of an issue. Most do not bother to try evaluating the evidence, a trait you can see on full display in this thread.

The only people who aren't thinking for themselves are the ones who watch news bits and read political pieces and think they are 100% true and telling the full story. None of them are. They are all biased and doing anything to make extra money offbtm jThis film is so ridiculously weak and manipulative. I don't watch or read any of the news outlets mentioned before.

I just really wish people would put their feelings aside when they watch this sort of thing or read these articles. Confirmation bias and identitarian politics are destroying this country now. Any time something affirms your oreexisting beliefs you should be DOUBLY suspicious of it and analyze it with even stronger doubt.

 

[malfeasance]

Hughinn,

Here are the 24 ballot drop box locations in Gwinnett County in 2020.

• Gwinnett – 24 Drop Boxes
• Bogan Park Community Recreation Center, 2723 North Bogan Road, Buford, GA 30519
• Dacula Park Activity Building, 2735 Old Auburn Ave., Dacula, GA 30019
• George Pierce Park Community Recreation Center, 55 Buford Highway, Suwanee, GA 30024
• Lenora Park Gym, 4515 Lenora Church Road, Snellville, GA 30039
• Lucky Shoals Park Community Recreation Center, 4651 Britt Road, Norcross, GA 30093
• Mountain Park Aquatic Center,1063 Rockbridge Road, Stone Mountain, GA 30087
• Shorty Howell Park Activity Building, 2750 Pleasant Hill Road, Duluth, GA 30096
• (2 at this location) Voter Registrations and Elections Beauty P. Baldwin Building, 455 Grayson Highway, Suite 200, Lawrenceville
• Buford-Sugar Hill Library 2100 Buford Hwy, Buford, GA 30518
• Centerville Library 3025 Bethany Church Road, Snellville, GA 30039
• Collins Hill Library 455 Camp Perrin Road, Lawrenceville, GA 30043
• Dacula Library 265 Dacula Road, Dacula, GA 30019
• Duluth Library 3480 Duluth Park Lane, Duluth, GA 30096
• Five Forks Library 2780 Five Forks Trickum Road, Lawrenceville, GA 30044
• Grayson Library 700 Grayson Parkway, Grayson, GA 30017
• Hamilton Mill Library 3690 Braselton Highway, Dacula, GA 30019
• Lawrenceville Library 1001 Lawrenceville Highway, Lawrenceville, GA 30046
• Lilburn Library 4817 Church Street, Lilburn, GA 30047
• Mountain Park Library 1210 Pounds Road SW, Lilburn, GA 30047
• Norcross Library 6025 Buford Hwy., Norcross, GA 30071
• Peachtree Corners Library 5570 Spalding Drive, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092
• Snellville Library 2740 Lenora Church Road, Snellville, GA 30078
• Suwanee Library 361 Main Street, Suwanee, GA 30024

 

[malfeasance]

Let me know if you think any of them line up with Gregg Phillip's orange dots that are nowhere near a white circle.

If you do no work from this point, then explain your very deliberate decision to remain ignorant when I spoon fed you the information you need to confirm things for yourself.

 

[malfeasance]

I know what I saw. It was voter fraud.

No, you saw a movie, and a very misleading one at that.

Now you have the tools you need to confirm whether what you were shown in the movie was true.

 

[malfeasance]

Man, Cell location data simply is NOT ACCURATE enough to support this data. That is plain and simple.

What does that matter?

If it is accurate down to six inches, but there is no ballot box within 5-10 miles of where the movie shows "mules" supposedly dropping ballots in boxes, then is the accuracy even relevant to the point the movie is trying to prove?

It is not.

It is simply a scientific dressing for the false claims being made that distracts persons of low intelligence or those not curious enough to investigate what they are being told (or too gullible to question it).

I mean, look at what Hughinn wrote, above. He knows what he saw, and it was voter fraud. He literally believes it because it was on TV.

Wait and see whether he even looks into the information I spoon fed him above. I predict he does not. Not intelligent enough, not curious enough, too gullible. After all, he saw it on TV.

 

[Hughinn]

What does that matter?

If it is accurate down to six inches, but there is no ballot box within 5-10 miles of where the movie shows "mules" supposedly dropping ballots in boxes, then is the accuracy even relevant to the point the movie is trying to prove?

It is not.

It is simply a scientific dressing for the false claims being made that distracts persons of low intelligence or those not curious enough to investigate what they are being told (or too gullible to question it).

I mean, look at what Hughinn wrote, above. He knows what he saw, and it was voter fraud. He literally believes it because it was on TV.

Wait and see whether he even looks into the information I spoon fed him above. I predict he does not. Not intelligent enough, not curious enough, too gullible. After all, he saw it on TV.

Look bud, if you think this guy staged all that video, and fabricated all that Geo tracking data to make money and it's all just fiction, then your a fucking idiot.

If you think your government doesn't lie to you, then you're a fucking idiot.

"False narrative" is something we see every day. "Russian collusion" "weapons of mass destruction" etc. And most of the bullshit comes from...the government.

Like I keep telling you, over and over. The documentary proves ballot harvesting, box stuffing and voter fraud happened. Because it's absolutely ignorant to think these people fabricated millions of hours of video and tracking data just to make themselves targets of the state.

It's just stupid to think that.

Lastly, it's blatantly obvious you haven't seen the documentary. Because everything you say, is identical, almost copy and paste identical from left wing ideologue blogs and "news" sources I've read as well.

Fact of the matter is, political parties manipulate voting processes and systems. And the film proved what we all knew already. And we should all be interested in how to prevent it. Instead of just defending our side.

.I don't have any love for the republican party. And I would feel the same way I do now about this fraud if it was them that did it. That's the difference between you and me.

You're in some faggot assed cosmopolitan type city cheering on the establishment.
I'm here in the swamp saying the bastards are lying.

We're both Americans.

We should both want election integrity. No amount of fraud should be acceptable.

This film is worth investigating. Which is all the maker is asking for. And me too.
And I believe that If it was a fabrication. That's the last thing they'd really want. Too much to lose. The makers have said openly they want to be taken to court, because then the state has to prove they made it up.

That's enough for me. Step up to the plate then and everyone lay down the cards.

We don't have to like each other to agree on that.

 

[Hughinn]

Smart leadership, and honest leadership should want nothing more than to prove their legitimacy to the people they proposed to rule.

This film, and this data should be the interest of every American. Because what's at stake is too important to disregard. No matter what your political beliefs are.

Literally half this country believe the last election was not fair.

Why not prove it was if you can?

 

[MFAAS]

It doesn't matter what people believe. They believe that because they heard it said over and over and over again. Like children being indoctinated about religion. They just believe it because for fucking 8 months straight all they heard was "If I don't win, it's because they cheated!! The election is rigged against me!" And people heard it so many times, day after day, that eventually they just believed it, with every morsel of their being--colloquially this became known as a "truthism".

@malfeasance isn't saying that the video was STAGED, as in, they hired actors to do this stuff. He's saying it's just random footage of people submitting their ballots, legitimately, that doesn't even come close to lining up with the ping-geolocation data from the cell phones of the purported ballot stuffers or whatever you want to call them.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but the election IS still being investigated...and it's actually Trump's team that is being investigated for a plethora of cheating-like activities. Setting up false electors? Please do explain to me how that is not blatant cheating. Republicans in multiple states are being sued for submitting their own electors, literally trying to lie their way into winning. The DOJ is investigating this because the claim is reputable and legitimate and PROVEN--unlike this movie.
2 Legitimate WI electors sue Trump-backed fake electors.

This also happened in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania... here is the full list if you are interested.

Trump also tried to cheat by replacing the postmaster General with a crony who would force mail sorting machines to be decommissioned, slowing down mail so mail-in ballots (which were assumed to be primarily democratic supporters) wouldn't get counted.

How about Florida? The hardcore right wing governor decided that ANY Floridians with felony records would be ineligible to vote unless they paid back all their outstanding court fines and fees--which is just a stupid, senseless thing to do and completely just an obvious way to eliminate votes on the liberal/democratic side.

Need I mention the gerrymandering?

The Republicans have cheated continuously throughout the years.

I guarantee you the democrats have done some shady stuff too. But do you really think anyone would be STUPID enough to pay a random person off the street to commit fraud by stuffing ballot boxes? That is just retarded!

YES I want to have legitimate, elections that we can trust and know the results are held up with integrity.

What I want is a fucking receipt after I vote, showing who I voted for--like those scantron tests you used to take in school with the numbered lines and then A B C D E, etc. I want a receipt that, if necessary, I can submit to be manually counted or re-ran through the scanner.

Honestly, you say you look at both sides, but you obviously don't. You don't even objectively look at your own side, you take in the most biased information possible and take it as the truth. Then rag on others for using common sense and critical thinking to debunk your claims, saying they are illegitimate because they're "left wing talking points".

So with that, I am fucking done with this conversation. I have given you a plethora of valuable information. If you truly want to be unbiased you'll give it a read and think it over and wait a day to respond. Sleep on it. Good luck to you.

 

[malfeasance]

Look bud, if you think this guy staged all that video, and fabricated all that Geo tracking data to make money and it's all just fiction, then your a fucking idiot.

If you think your government doesn't lie to you, then you're a fucking idiot.

"False narrative" is something we see every day. "Russian collusion" "weapons of mass destruction" etc. And most of the bullshit comes from...the government.

Like I keep telling you, over and over. The documentary proves ballot harvesting, box stuffing and voter fraud happened. Because it's absolutely ignorant to think these people fabricated millions of hours of video and tracking data just to make themselves targets of the state.

It's just stupid to think that.

Lastly, it's blatantly obvious you haven't seen the documentary. Because everything you say, is identical, almost copy and paste identical from left wing ideologue blogs and "news" sources I've read as well.

Fact of the matter is, political parties manipulate voting processes and systems. And the film proved what we all knew already. And we should all be interested in how to prevent it. Instead of just defending our side.

.I don't have any love for the republican party. And I would feel the same way I do now about this fraud if it was them that did it. That's the difference between you and me.

You're in some faggot assed cosmopolitan type city cheering on the establishment.
I'm here in the swamp saying the bastards are lying.

We're both Americans.

We should both want election integrity. No amount of fraud should be acceptable.

This film is worth investigating. Which is all the maker is asking for. And me too.
And I believe that If it was a fabrication. That's the last thing they'd really want. Too much to lose. The makers have said openly they want to be taken to court, because then the state has to prove they made it up.

That's enough for me. Step up to the plate then and everyone lay down the cards.

We don't have to like each other to agree on that.

How can you write such a long email and not address a single thing I wrote?

If you think this guy staged the video - not responsive to anything I wrote

and fabricated all that geo tracking data - again not responsive to anything I wrote

accusing me of being a fucking idiot - still not responsive to anything I wrote.

Then a long essay on things also having nothing to do with what I wrote.

There were no ballot boxes in the locations shown in the film for Gwinnett County (where he also had video of a guy dropping multiple ballots which turned out to be him and direct family members).

Staged video? No, the video was real. Fabricated geo tracking? No, again.

But if the geotracking shows a cell phone holder at 123 Main Street, and there is no ballot box within 10 miles of 123 Main Street, then what does the video and geo tracking matter?

So call me a fucking idiot again and avoid what I have written. The film lies about the location of ballot boxes.

I gave you all of the ballot box locations above. You don't need to rely upon me, however. It's public record.

So just ignore all of that, call me a fucking idiot, and write another essay about election integrity and pretend you don't now know that the film lied to you.

 

[Hughinn]

How can you write such a long email and not address a single thing I wrote?

If you think this guy staged the video - not responsive to anything I wrote

and fabricated all that geo tracking data - again not responsive to anything I wrote

accusing me of being a fucking idiot - still not responsive to anything I wrote.

Then a long essay on things also having nothing to do with what I wrote.

There were no ballot boxes in the locations shown in the film for Gwinnett County (where he also had video of a guy dropping multiple ballots which turned out to be him and direct family members).

Staged video? No, the video was real. Fabricated geo tracking? No, again.

But if the geotracking shows a cell phone holder at 123 Main Street, and there is no ballot box within 10 miles of 123 Main Street, then what does the video and geo tracking matter?

So call me a fucking idiot again and avoid what I have written. The film lies about the location of ballot boxes.

I gave you all of the ballot box locations above. You don't need to rely upon me, however. It's public record.

So just ignore all of that, call me a fucking idiot, and write another essay about election integrity and pretend you don't now know that the film lied to you.

You are a fucking idiot.

Your entire argument is that the documentary is a fabricated lie and a bunch of made up or staged video.
Any Twitter idiot like yourself can make a map. It doesn't mean shit.

Maps of shit like ATM or mailbox locations are often not precise. So stick it up your ass with that map. Nobody has a legal reason to visit 20-30 different drop boxes and NGOs.

And if you want to prove these people are lying, then go here and prove it if you think your Mr hot shit and have it all figured out.

Of course, your Mr hot shit self would have to actually watch the movie, and we all know you haven't

 

[Hughinn]

It doesn't matter what people believe. They believe that because they heard it said over and over and over again. Like children being indoctinated about religion. They just believe it because for fucking 8 months straight all they heard was "If I don't win, it's because they cheated!! The election is rigged against me!" And people heard it so many times, day after day, that eventually they just believed it, with every morsel of their being--colloquially this became known as a "truthism".

@malfeasance isn't saying that the video was STAGED, as in, they hired actors to do this stuff. He's saying it's just random footage of people submitting their ballots, legitimately, that doesn't even come close to lining up with the ping-geolocation data from the cell phones of the purported ballot stuffers or whatever you want to call them.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but the election IS still being investigated...and it's actually Trump's team that is being investigated for a plethora of cheating-like activities. Setting up false electors? Please do explain to me how that is not blatant cheating. Republicans in multiple states are being sued for submitting their own electors, literally trying to lie their way into winning. The DOJ is investigating this because the claim is reputable and legitimate and PROVEN--unlike this movie.
2 Legitimate WI electors sue Trump-backed fake electors.

This also happened in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania... here is the full list if you are interested.

Trump also tried to cheat by replacing the postmaster General with a crony who would force mail sorting machines to be decommissioned, slowing down mail so mail-in ballots (which were assumed to be primarily democratic supporters) wouldn't get counted.

How about Florida? The hardcore right wing governor decided that ANY Floridians with felony records would be ineligible to vote unless they paid back all their outstanding court fines and fees--which is just a stupid, senseless thing to do and completely just an obvious way to eliminate votes on the liberal/democratic side.

Need I mention the gerrymandering?

The Republicans have cheated continuously throughout the years.

I guarantee you the democrats have done some shady stuff too. But do you really think anyone would be STUPID enough to pay a random person off the street to commit fraud by stuffing ballot boxes? That is just retarded!

YES I want to have legitimate, elections that we can trust and know the results are held up with integrity.

What I want is a fucking receipt after I vote, showing who I voted for--like those scantron tests you used to take in school with the numbered lines and then A B C D E, etc. I want a receipt that, if necessary, I can submit to be manually counted or re-ran through the scanner.

Honestly, you say you look at both sides, but you obviously don't. You don't even objectively look at your own side, you take in the most biased information possible and take it as the truth. Then rag on others for using common sense and critical thinking to debunk your claims, saying they are illegitimate because they're "left wing talking points".

So with that, I am fucking done with this conversation. I have given you a plethora of valuable information. If you truly want to be unbiased you'll give it a read and think it over and wait a day to respond. Sleep on it. Good luck to you.

Why don't you join Mr hot shit and ask the people themselves.

Then Mr hot shit, and Mr dumb shit can go to the horses mouth and prove them wrong.

Of course, that means you two dip shits would have to actually watch the documentary instead of just parroting bullshit talking points.

But have at it.

 

[malfeasance]

Your entire argument is that the documentary is a fabricated lie and a bunch of made up or staged video.

That's not my argument at all. Go back and reread. The documentary, if you want to call it that, shows geolocation data. The documentary tells you that this data shows persons supposedly making drops at ballot boxes.

The problem is that there are no ballot boxes where the documentary shows them.

I provided you with the address of every ballot box in Gwinnett County. You can check this for yourself (and you don't have to rely on me providing you those 24 addresses; It is public record, and you can request it and go around me). You can actually figure out where they are and compare it to what the documentary shows <--- well, if you were interested in the truth, but you're not, are you?

So, no, you do not understand my argument at all, but then you really don't want to understand my argument, do you? You have in fact avoided it with every post, repeatedly.

 

[malfeasance]

Any Twitter idiot like yourself can make a map. It doesn't mean shit.

You can make your own map. I gave you the addresses, or you can get them yourself if you do not trust that I am giving you the correct addresses.

Nobody has a legal reason to visit 20-30 different drop boxes and NGOs.

Well, if there were drop boxes where the documentary shows them, then you might have some kind of point. If there is not drop box within miles of where the documentary shows them visiting, then I suppose you don't have much of a point. 20-30 locations where no drop box is located - sounds a little different.

 

[malfeasance]

@malfeasance isn't saying that the video was STAGED, as in, they hired actors to do this stuff. He's saying it's just random footage of people submitting their ballots, legitimately, that doesn't even come close to lining up with the ping-geolocation data from the cell phones of the purported ballot stuffers or whatever you want to call them.

At least somebody in this thread can read.

One of the videos is inset on a large map, with a line pointing to a location on the map - the map is Moscow, Russia, reversed (mirror image).

As far as I can tell, the video is real, mostly from government surveillance cameras at the drop boxes. That does not mean that it shows what the documentary is claiming in each case, and True the Vote admits that none of the video is keyed to a particular geolocation record for a particular cell phone (which is odd given that the folks who think this documentary "proves" ballot stuffing all seem to think the opposite of what True The Vote says, so folks believe something True The Vote is not even claiming).

NONE of the videos are in Pennsylvania, however. Gregg Philipps testified to a Senate committee there that any geolocation hit within 100 feet (not a typo) of a ballot drop box would qualify.

 

[MR_Midas]

Are you high, or just stupid?
Literally nothing you say can't be heard on CNN or MSNBC on a nightly basis.

Why are you incapable of thinking for yourself? Obviously you haven't watched the documentary, but ask yourself what reason a person traveled to 28 drop boxes and 5 different, non-profit organizations. This is caught clearly on the film because the investigation was conducted by tracking down the specific videos by using the dates and times of their visits. They matched the time of the videos to the time of the visit. It doesn't get any better than that. Unless you got your head up your ass. It's pretty obvious.

Your totally full of shit saying "it's just a bunch of random videos of people putting multiple ballots in boxes". Clear as fuck, you didn't watch the documentary and your spewing CNN talking points

It's all there. Plain as day. People are serving life sentences in prisons all over America as we speak...convicted on evidence no where near as conclusive as this.

And you parroted the typical bullshit "context" "no proof" etc. What is proof, if video surveillance is not?

What the hell is wrong with you people? Why aren't you howling for the authorities to find these people and investigate instead of parroting bullshit?

You : "the people responsible for the process say they didn't do anything wrong". Even though you can see...they did.

I love reading your dialogue, you both make my mood. You are cool guys

 

[Hughinn]

That's not my argument at all. Go back and reread. The documentary, if you want to call it that, shows geolocation data. The documentary tells you that this data shows persons supposedly making drops at ballot boxes.

The problem is that there are no ballot boxes where the documentary shows them.

I provided you with the address of every ballot box in Gwinnett County. You can check this for yourself (and you don't have to rely on me providing you those 24 addresses; It is public record, and you can request it and go around me). You can actually figure out where they are and compare it to what the documentary shows <--- well, if you were interested in the truth, but you're not, are you?

So, no, you do not understand my argument at all, but then you really don't want to understand my argument, do you? You have in fact avoided it with every post, repeatedly.

If you insist the ballot boxes are not where the video shows them, then why is there a ballot box in the millions of hours of video if you're right and it's not really there?

Your lying and bullshitting now. At least stick to your story.

Either they made it up and the videos are staged and the data fabricated from thin air, or the data is genuine and the videos real.

Nobody is buying your bullshit.

Your argument in your words is that the documentary is fake. A fraud. And made to get someone rich by telling lies. That's what you said. Don't backpedal on it now

So why don't you watch it, since you haven't seen it, and go here and ask them

 

[Hughinn]

At least somebody in this thread can read.

One of the videos is inset on a large map, with a line pointing to a location on the map - the map is Moscow, Russia, reversed (mirror image).

As far as I can tell, the video is real, mostly from government surveillance cameras at the drop boxes. That does not mean that it shows what the documentary is claiming in each case, and True the Vote admits that none of the video is keyed to a particular geolocation record for a particular cell phone (which is odd given that the folks who think this documentary "proves" ballot stuffing all seem to think the opposite of what True The Vote says, so folks believe something True The Vote is not even claiming).

NONE of the videos are in Pennsylvania, however. Gregg Philipps testified to a Senate committee there that any geolocation hit within 100 feet (not a typo) of a ballot drop box would qualify.

Now you're talking out both sides of your face again.
True the vote says specifically that the data is tracked using specific cell phones that met very specific criteria of visiting very specific locations a minimum number of times.

So just what the fuck is this horseshit statement here
"True the Vote admits that none of the video is keyed to a particular geolocation record for a particular cell phone"

When geo location tracking by definition is exactly that = location pings at specific locations for specific cell phones.

Your talking out your ass here, and not making any sense whatsoever.

First it's fake, but then its not
Then there's some map you got off Twitter from some geek that proves what?
Now Geo location is not specific phones at specific locations....when, actually that's all it is, so what the fuck nonsense are you talking about?

Seriously, your getting incoherent now and talking nonsense.

 

[HDH]

Damn, I just couldn't read any more of this shit.

@malfeasance

Not sure where to start here so I'll start with your twitter meme that proves this election was the most secure on the plant.

Let me say this again but louder just in case you didn't here it the first time.

YOU ARE POSTING TWITTER MEMES TO PROVE THE ELECTION FRAUD WAS FAKE!!!!

I didn't think much of it the first time because it was a meme. You can post it here if you like-

Political memes

Ok ladies and gents, no sense in typing our replies out when we can post pics with words already typed :) I know we are pretty serious about our views but we can also make light of our views. I'll get it started for for both views... ...

thinksteroids.com

So you want to know why I didn't line up drop boxes to the map because of your memes?

Because they were memes.

I see you had a list of addies now, did you line everything up on a real map to match everything or just post it and want Hughinn to prove you wrong?

Send your link that shows they were 2020, put all your proof and matching up together then we'll talk. Until then, you have bullshit.

And let me ask this since I'm the gullible one.

Why in the FUCK would they go to all the trouble of making the movie and putting the drop box locations in the wrong places?

It means one of two things, they are really stupid or you...

4,000,000 mins of video, you can bet your ass they have same people filmed at different locations, they even say so. You are just cherry picking bullshit to run with a narrative.

You guys are so easy.

And BTW, I'll answer for Hughinn, post #127 is a meme. All you have to do is add the text "" Dramatizations are NOT proof ""

Even though you don't watch cnn, the point is you share the same views, on almost everything. If you don't get that, it's the same reason you don't get any of this.