War on Domestic Terrorism

Millard

Member
Staff member
10+ Year Member
20+ Year Member

View: https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1162432828824608768


H.R.4192 - Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act116th Congress (2019-2020)​

BILL​


Sponsor:
Rep. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA-28] (Introduced 08/16/2019)

Cosponsors:
Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8] 08/23/2019
Rep. Cisneros, Gilbert Ray, Jr. [D-CA-39] 08/23/2019
Rep. Rose, Max [D-NY-11] 08/23/2019
Rep. Hastings, Alcee L. [D-FL-20] 08/23/2019
Rep. Napolitano, Grace F. [D-CA-32] 08/23/2019
Rep. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large] 08/23/2019
Rep. Malinowski, Tom [D-NJ-7] 08/23/2019
Rep. Rouda, Harley [D-CA-48] 09/10/2019
Rep. Kuster, Ann M. [D-NH-2] 09/10/2019

Summary: H.R.4192 — 116th Congress (2019-2020)
Introduced in House (08/16/2019)

Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act

This bill applies penalties for international terrorism to certain domestic criminal offenses when they are committed with the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a government, or affect the conduct of a government.

Source: H.R.4192 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act
 

Attachments


View: https://twitter.com/civilrightsorg/status/1351625963696746503


Leading Civil Rights Organizations Oppose Creation of New Domestic Terrorism Legislation​

FIGHTING HATE & BIAS NEWS, JUSTICE REFORM NEWS 01.19,21

Contact: Janessa Sambola-Harris, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, sambolaharris@civilrghts.org
Nadia Aziz, Arab American Institute, nadia@aaiusa.org
Logan Smith, Bend the Arc: Jewish Action, lsmith@bendthearc.us
Eric Naing, Muslim Advocates, eric@muslimadvocates.org
Juan Martinez, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, media@naacpldf.org

WASHINGTON— In the aftermath of the January 6 deadly attack on Congress by far right extremists, including white nationalists, 135 civil and human rights organizations led by The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, the Arab American Institute, Bend the Arc: Jewish Action, Muslim Advocates, and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund called on Congress to ensure that the Department of Justice utilize the over 50 federal statutes already in existence to investigate and prosecute individuals who participated in the insurrection. The groups identified other actions Congress can take to address the long-standing and ongoing threat posed by white supremacists and urged them to abstain from passing any additional domestic terrorism laws.

In strongly opposing the creation of a new domestic terrorism charge, the organizations pointed out the harsh reality that counterterrorism practices are far too often blatantly misused to target and criminalize the very marginalized communities that white supremacists target for hate. “We are concerned that a new federal domestic terrorism statute or list would adversely impact civil rights and — as our nation’s long and disturbing history of targeting Black Activists, Muslims, Arabs, and movements for social and racial justice has shown — this new authority could be used to expand racial profiling or be wielded to surveil and investigate communities of color and political opponents in the name of national security,” they noted.

“The government’s inadequate response to rising white nationalism is a disgraceful policy failure. The problem is hardly new, and prosecutors have long had a multitude of criminal statutes at their disposal to confront white supremacist violence,” said Wade J. Henderson, interim president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. “The time is overdue to refocus resources, implement prosecutorial guidance, and prioritize combatting white nationalism as the grave threat that it is. Congress can support these efforts, not by passing additional counterterrorism laws, but instead by enforcing existing laws and using its formidable oversight and appropriations authority to demand a more effective response from federal law enforcement agencies.”

“We don’t lack the tools to hold white supremacists and anti-government actors accountable — we have lacked the political will to do so. At the same time, as part of the endless ‘war on terror,’ Arab Americans and American Muslims are treated as suspicious,” said Maya Berry, executive director of the Arab American Institute. “In an inherently biased criminal legal system, we know how additional legal authorities will be used — they will be used just as they have previously — to target directly impacted communities, including Black and Brown people and religious minorities.”

“For years, authorities have ignored or downplayed the threat that violent white nationalists pose not only to the individuals and communities they target, but to democracy itself. While there are many reasons why our justice system has failed to prosecute these groups, a lack of resources or laws is not among them — and must not be part of any rushed solution,” said Rabbi Jason Kimelman-Block, Washington director of Bend the Arc: Jewish Action. “We need a thorough accounting of what resources are being allocated to target and contain these groups, as well as a full accounting of the extent to which these groups have infiltrated law enforcement agencies themselves.”

“American Muslims know all too well what happens when policymakers who want to look like they’re doing something expand terrorism-related authorities in response to extremist violence,” said Madihha Ahussain, special counsel for Anti-Muslim Bigotry at Muslim Advocates. “Giving law enforcement yet more power to surveil and criminalize people will ultimately hurt Muslims and communities of color. As the acting U.S. attorney in charge of the Capitol riot investigation made clear: Law enforcement already has all the tools they need and more to investigate and prosecute threats and criminal activity. The problem is that the government is not prioritizing preventing white nationalist violence, not that they don’t have enough power and resources.”

“The January 6 coup attempt led by white supremacist groups attempting to overturn the will of the American people to choose its leader is a clear example of how pervasive white supremacy is in our society and within the ranks of law enforcement itself,” said Sherrilyn Ifill, president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. “Violence perpetrated by white supremacist groups has been allowed to increase because federal law enforcement officials have chosen not to enforce the investigatory and prosecutorial statutes already in place. What we do not need is for Congress to undertake an unnecessary expansion of federal domestic terrorism statues that will inevitably threaten the civil rights of Black communities and other communities of color.”

The full letter and signatories are available here.

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights is a coalition charged by its diverse membership of more than 220 national organizations to promote and protect the rights of all persons in the United States. The Leadership Conference works toward an America as good as its ideals. For more information on The Leadership Conference and its member organizations, visit www.civilrights.org.

The Arab American Institute is a national civil rights advocacy organization whose mission is to encourage and nurture the direct participation of Arab Americans in civic life. Representing the estimated 3.7 Million Arab Americans across all 50 states, The Arab American Institute provides research and analysis to policy makers on a range of issues including on strengthening democracy, protecting civil rights and civil liberties for all, and standing for international peace and human rights. You can follow the work of AAI on Twitter at @AAIUSA, or by visiting aaiusa.org.

Bend the Arc: Jewish Action is uniting a movement of tens of thousands of progressive Jews across the country who are fighting for justice and equality for all. We are the only national Jewish organization focused exclusively on social change in the United States.

Muslim Advocates is a national civil rights organization working in the courts, in the halls of power and in communities to halt bigotry in its tracks. We ensure that American Muslims have a seat at the table with expert representation so that all Americans may live free from hate and discrimination.

Founded in 1940, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is the nation’s first civil and human rights law organization. LDF has been completely separate from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) since 1957—although LDF was originally founded by the NAACP and shares its commitment to equal rights. LDF’s Thurgood Marshall Institute is a multi-disciplinary and collaborative hub within LDF that launches targeted campaigns and undertakes innovative research to shape the civil rights narrative. In media attributions, please refer to us as the NAACP Legal Defense Fund or LDF.
 

Attachments

ACLU STATEMENT OPPOSING H.R. 4192, CONFRONTING THE THREAT OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM ACT​


In this letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, the ACLU urged Members to oppose H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act. By reifying and broadening domestic terrorism authorities, H.R. 4192 would unnecessarily expand law enforcement authorities to target and discriminate against the very communities Congress is seeking to protect. The additional crimes, criminal penalties, and expansion of the death penalty in H.R. 4192 would further incorporate abusive terrorism authorities into a discriminatory criminal justice system.

People of color and other marginalized communities have long been targeted under domestic terrorism authorities for unfair and discriminatory surveillance, investigations, and prosecutions. Law enforcement agencies' use of these authorities undermines and has violated equal protection, due process, and First Amendment rights.

Source: ACLU Statement Opposing H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act
 

Attachments

House Democrats that oppose the Domestic Terrorism Act:

Rep. Rashida Tlaib
Rep. Earl Blumenauer
Rep. Ro Khanna
Rep. Jamaal Bowman, Ed.D.
Rep. Barbara Lee
Rep. Pramila Jayapal
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Rep. Mondaire Jones
Rep. Ilhan Omar
Rep. Ayanna Pressley


View: https://twitter.com/RepRashida/status/1351654801524875270?s=20


Tlaib Leads Colleagues to Urge Civil Liberties Be Protected in Wake of Capitol Attack
January 19, 2021 Press Release

WASHINGTON—Today, Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (MI-13) led nine of her colleagues in sending a letter to Congressional leadership, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, urging that national security powers not be expanded in light of the attack on the U.S. Capitol that occurred two weeks ago, as such measures often lead to the erosion of Americans’ civil liberties.

“The Trump mob’s success in breaching the Capitol was not due to a lack of resources at the disposal of federal law enforcement, and in this moment we must resist the erosion of our civil liberties and Constitutional freedoms, however well-intentioned proposed security reforms may be,” the lawmakers wrote. “We firmly believe that the national security and surveillance powers of the U.S. government are already too broad, undefined, and unaccountable to the people.”

The letter goes on to list a series of initiatives they say were sold as being necessary to fight extremism but quickly devolved into tools used for the mass violation of human and civil rights, including House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) Counterintelligence Program (COINTELPRO), the USA Patriot Act, and the FBI’s anti-Black Lives Matter Operation Iron Fist. Instead of such initiatives, the lawmakers wrote leadership should set out to achieve the following four goals in their response to the Capitol attack:

Fully investigate the violent January 6, 2021 attack in a non-partisan, transparent manner.
Commit today to release all findings from any investigations into the attack to the public.
Recognize white nationalist and QAnon groups as the national security threat that they are and take action to combat them through existing laws, powers and regulations.
Recognize that the reason that the threat posed by these groups hasn’t already been adequately addressed is because of a deeply ingrained unwillingness and/or hesitancy to act against these groups within all three branches of government, especially in the law enforcement community, including the Department of Justice, FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and intelligence agencies, not the result of insufficient domestic national security and/or surveillance powers.

“In the face of great tragedy, we call on you to reject reactionary demands to further erode the rights and liberties of the American people,” the letter concludes.

The letter was cosigned by Reps. Earl Blumenauer, Jamaal Bowman, Pramila Jayapal, Ro Khanna, Mondaire Jones, Barbara Lee, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and Ayanna Pressley. It’s also been endorsed by the following organizations: Demand Progress, Free Press, Win Without War, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

The full text of the letter can be read here.

Source: https://tlaib.house.gov/media/press-releases/tlaib-leads-colleagues-urge-civil-liberties-be-protected-wake-capitol-attack
 

Attachments

Next comes deprogramming camps, and re-education schools for those pesky right wingers, all 74m of em. We gonna need some large camps.
 
Both Dems and Republicans habe gone down this road before...... Can't put my finger on what it reminds me of......oh wait.

The Reichstag fire (German: Reichstagsbrand, About this soundlisten (help·info)) was an arson attack on the Reichstag building, home of the German parliament in Berlin, on Monday 27 February 1933, precisely four weeks after Adolf Hitler was sworn in as Chancellor of Germany. Hitler's government stated that Marinus van der Lubbe, a Dutch council communist, was the culprit, and it attributed the fire to communist agitators. A German court decided later that year that Van der Lubbe had acted alone, as he had claimed. The day after the fire, the Reichstag Fire Decree was passed. The Nazi Party used the fire as a pretext to claim that communists were plotting against the German government, which made the fire pivotal in the establishment of Nazi Germany.
 
The Capitol insurrection has apparently increased support for various types of "anti-protest" legislation in States across the United States.


View: https://twitter.com/theintercept/status/1354513424466771969?s=20


STATE LEGISLATURES MAKE “UNPRECEDENTED” PUSH ON ANTI-PROTEST BILLS​

Since the day of the Capitol insurrection, nearly a fifth of states moved bills that would crack down on protests.​


Since the day of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, at least nine states have introduced 14 anti-protest bills. The bills, which vary state by state, contain a dizzying array of provisions that serve to criminalize participation in disruptive protests. The measures range from barring demonstrators from public benefits or government jobs to offering legal protections to those who shoot or run over protesters. Some of the proposals would allow protesters to be held without bail and criminalize camping. A few bills seek to prevent local governments from defunding police.

The pushes by close to a fifth of state legislatures are part of a pattern that began to pick up speed after the summer’s uprisings in response to the police killing of George Floyd, which in many communities included significant property damage. In a handful of states, lawmakers did what they often do: introduced new legislation — however unnecessary — to show that they were responding to their constituents’ concerns.

The rate of new bills being offered sped up dramatically this month as lawmakers kicked off their legislative sessions at the very moment that Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol. Bills quickly arose in Arizona, Florida, Indiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Rhode Island.

Source: State Legislatures Make “Unprecedented” Push on Anti-Protest Bills
 
The Capitol insurrection has apparently increased support for various types of "anti-protest" legislation in States across the United States.


View: https://twitter.com/theintercept/status/1354513424466771969?s=20


STATE LEGISLATURES MAKE “UNPRECEDENTED” PUSH ON ANTI-PROTEST BILLS​

Since the day of the Capitol insurrection, nearly a fifth of states moved bills that would crack down on protests.​


Since the day of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, at least nine states have introduced 14 anti-protest bills. The bills, which vary state by state, contain a dizzying array of provisions that serve to criminalize participation in disruptive protests. The measures range from barring demonstrators from public benefits or government jobs to offering legal protections to those who shoot or run over protesters. Some of the proposals would allow protesters to be held without bail and criminalize camping. A few bills seek to prevent local governments from defunding police.

The pushes by close to a fifth of state legislatures are part of a pattern that began to pick up speed after the summer’s uprisings in response to the police killing of George Floyd, which in many communities included significant property damage. In a handful of states, lawmakers did what they often do: introduced new legislation — however unnecessary — to show that they were responding to their constituents’ concerns.

The rate of new bills being offered sped up dramatically this month as lawmakers kicked off their legislative sessions at the very moment that Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol. Bills quickly arose in Arizona, Florida, Indiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Rhode Island.

Source: State Legislatures Make “Unprecedented” Push on Anti-Protest Bills

Who didn't see this coming. The whole thing was a set up, they let them in. Not surprised with co author of the patriot act at the helm
 
Last edited:
The Capitol insurrection has apparently increased support for various types of "anti-protest" legislation in States across the United States.


View: https://twitter.com/theintercept/status/1354513424466771969?s=20


STATE LEGISLATURES MAKE “UNPRECEDENTED” PUSH ON ANTI-PROTEST BILLS​

Since the day of the Capitol insurrection, nearly a fifth of states moved bills that would crack down on protests.​


Since the day of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, at least nine states have introduced 14 anti-protest bills. The bills, which vary state by state, contain a dizzying array of provisions that serve to criminalize participation in disruptive protests. The measures range from barring demonstrators from public benefits or government jobs to offering legal protections to those who shoot or run over protesters. Some of the proposals would allow protesters to be held without bail and criminalize camping. A few bills seek to prevent local governments from defunding police.

The pushes by close to a fifth of state legislatures are part of a pattern that began to pick up speed after the summer’s uprisings in response to the police killing of George Floyd, which in many communities included significant property damage. In a handful of states, lawmakers did what they often do: introduced new legislation — however unnecessary — to show that they were responding to their constituents’ concerns.

The rate of new bills being offered sped up dramatically this month as lawmakers kicked off their legislative sessions at the very moment that Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol. Bills quickly arose in Arizona, Florida, Indiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Rhode Island.

Source: State Legislatures Make “Unprecedented” Push on Anti-Protest Bills


Too many times in history have we gone down this road.......not good.
 
The Founding Fathers of the USA were .... White... and nationalists....White Nationalists in fact. Buuuuuuuut White Nationalism is now a crime.
Meanwhile being a Jewish Nationalist = $$$$Trillions in direct and indirect aid per year, plus literal wars, coups, bombings, no-knock raids, and other state terrorism against anyone who opposes it.
Got it
 
The Founding Fathers of the USA were .... White... and nationalists....White Nationalists in fact. Buuuuuuuut White Nationalism is now a crime.
Meanwhile being a Jewish Nationalist = $$$$Trillions in direct and indirect aid per year, plus literal wars, coups, bombings, no-knock raids, and other state terrorism against anyone who opposes it.
Got it
It really is entirely irrelevant what the founding fathers were or were not. They are ling dead and all held archaic ideas about race and society.

The fact is modern America is a melting pot and all humans, regardless of ethnicity or religion or gender, should have equal rights under the constitution and the 14th amendment to pursue happiness and freedom in this great country. Overly nationalist view points, whether it be white supremacy, black/afro-centrist ideologies, or whatever, bring no value to modern society.

We are all stronger united than we are torn apart by petty beliefs designed to hold minotiries down or subjgate groups of people to unfair/inhumane treatment.

Imagine how good the world could be if we all worked together to force the government to work FOR US unstead of for the super PACs and big corporations. Imagine how much better life could be for billions of people if we forced businesses to stop treating people like slaves in sweatshops in exchange for increased profits. Imagine if 70% of the population of the richest nation on Earth wasn't living paycheck to paycheck, and could actually spend time improving both their lives as well as their communities.

I want to live in a world where we make things better for everyone, because it is well within our capabilities to do so. We just continuously actively choose not to out of some false idea that making others' lives better will somehow make ours worse. It is bullshit. Bothfat left liberals and the majority of conservatives need to see this truth.
 
It really is entirely irrelevant what the founding fathers were or were not. They are ling dead and all held archaic ideas about race and society.

The fact is modern America is a melting pot and all humans, regardless of ethnicity or religion or gender, should have equal rights under the constitution and the 14th amendment to pursue happiness and freedom in this great country. Overly nationalist view points, whether it be white supremacy, black/afro-centrist ideologies, or whatever, bring no value to modern society.

We are all stronger united than we are torn apart by petty beliefs designed to hold minotiries down or subjgate groups of people to unfair/inhumane treatment.

Imagine how good the world could be if we all worked together to force the government to work FOR US unstead of for the super PACs and big corporations. Imagine how much better life could be for billions of people if we forced businesses to stop treating people like slaves in sweatshops in exchange for increased profits. Imagine if 70% of the population of the richest nation on Earth wasn't living paycheck to paycheck, and could actually spend time improving both their lives as well as their communities.

I want to live in a world where we make things better for everyone, because it is well within our capabilities to do so. We just continuously actively choose not to out of some false idea that making others' lives better will somehow make ours worse. It is bullshit. Bothfat left liberals and the majority of conservatives need to see this truth.


Irrelevant what the Founders thought, BUT
rights under the Constitution and the 14th Amendment.

That is, the ideas of the Founders.

So much cognitive dissonance in what you wrote.
 
Irrelevant what the Founders thought, BUT
rights under the Constitution and the 14th Amendment.

That is, the ideas of the Founders.

So much cognitive dissonance in what you wrote.
Good point!
Like with most retarded Anti-White cognitive dissonance, all their rhetoric and narrative only makes sense when you understand that it's a means to an end - power and genociding Whites.

Examples:
Jesus loves all!! Jesus was an immigrant too!!! But Christianity is racist white supremacy genocide of Jews, Brown people, Blacks, etc.

The USA is a melting pot and a nation of immigrants!!!!! But the USA is also White Supremacist KKK Nazism so we have to get rid of all the Whites.

The 1st Amendment protects speech like inciting hatred against Whites (White Privilege Theory, Critical Race Theory, etc), BUT the 1st Amendment doesn't protect "hate speech" (i.e. White people advocating for their own interests, not even hating anyone nor inciting violence of any kind).

Etc.
 
Back
Top