The bullshit in Ferguson, white cop shot black guy

And I thought it was a question of whether the use of force (shooting) by a law enforcement officer was legally justified. There is considerable legal precedent to discuss when evaluating the evidence in the case.

Racism just gets in the way of this discussion on both sides.
 
I had an assignment the day sharpton visited south Florida for the Trayvon Martin stand up around the nation he was doing and let me tell you it was the most racist shit you could if witnessed coming from the black community. Our country is more divided then ever.

I should never say this because it will backfire. But the black community does nothing in improving the situation within the nation. It is always about pulling the race card before settling with more logical and reasonable approaches instead.

The funny thing is if you asked many blacks if they miss MLK Jr they would all say yes yes but the reality is that whites miss him more than anyone. He did not have a distorted convoluted sense of loyalty based on skin color but a practicality and judgement based on right and wrong. Often preaching the way to overcome a stereotype ad shatter it forever is to no longer live or participate in that stereotype. So sad that even asswipes that are elected officials are not even smart enough to be able to perceive this basic human concept of right and wrong.
 
And I thought it was a question of whether the use of force (shooting) by a law enforcement officer was legally justified. There is considerable legal precedent to discuss when evaluating the evidence in the case.

Racism just gets in the way of this discussion on both sides.



Cigars, But Not Close
by Mark Steyn
August 15, 2014


http://www.steynonline.com/6524/cigars-but-not-close

923.jpg



The "narrative" of Ferguson, Missouri changed somewhat today. But, amid the confusion, the blundering stupidity of the city's police department remains consistent.

This morning the Police Chief, Thomas Jackson, released security-camera shots of the late Michael Brown apparently stealing a five-dollar box of cigarillos from a convenience store. So the 18-year old shot dead by Chief Jackson's officer was no longer a "gentle giant" en route to college but just another crappy third-rate violent teen n'er-do-well.

This afternoon, the chief gave a second press conference. Why would he do that? Well, he'd somehow managed to create the impression in his first press conference that the officer who killed Mr Brown was responding to the robbery. In fact, that was not the case. The Ferguson policeman was unaware that Brown was a robbery suspect at the time he encountered him and shot him dead. Which is presumably why Chief Jackson was leaned on to give his second press conference and tidy up the mess from the first. So we have an officer who sees two young men, unwanted for any crime, walking down the middle of the street and stops his cruiser. Three minutes later one of them is dead.

On the other hand, Jackson further confused matters by suggesting that he noticed Brown had cigars in his hand and might be the suspect.

It's important, when something goes wrong, to be clear about what it is that's at issue. Talking up Michael Brown as this season's Trayvonesque angel of peace and scholarship was foolish, and looting stores in his saintly memory even worse. But this week's pictures from Ferguson, such as the one above, ought to be profoundly disquieting to those Americans of a non-looting bent.

The most basic problem is that we will never know for certain what happened. Why? Because the Ferguson cruiser did not have a camera recording the incident. That's simply not credible. "Law" "enforcement" in Ferguson apparently has at its disposal tear gas, riot gear, armored vehicles and machine guns ...but not a dashcam. That's ridiculous. I remember a few years ago when my one-man police department in New Hampshire purchased a camera for its cruiser. It's about as cheap and basic a police expense as there is.

Last year, my meek mild-mannered mumsy office manager was pulled over by an angry small-town cop in breach of her Fourth Amendment rights. The state lost in court because the officer's artful narrative and the usual faked-up-after-the-fact incident report did not match the dashcam footage. Three years ago, I was pulled over by an unmarked vehicle in Vermont and (to put it mildly) erroneously ticketed. In court, I was withering about the department's policy of no dashcams for unmarked cars, and traffic cops driving around pretending to be James Bond but without the super-secret spy camera. The judge loathed me (as judges tend to), but I won that case. In 2014, when a police cruiser doesn't have a camera, it's a conscious choice. And it should be regarded as such.

And, if we have to have federal subsidy programs for municipal police departments, we should scrap the one that gives them the second-hand military hardware from Tikrit and Kandahar and replace it with one that ensures every patrol car has a camera.

As for what's happened in the days since the shooting, I've written a lot in recent months about the appalling militarization of the police in America, and I don't have much to add. But I did get a mordant chuckle out of this line from Kathy Shaidle on the green-camouflaged officers pictured above:

Shouldn't a 'Ferguson' camo pattern be, like, 7/11 & Kool-Aid logos?

Indeed. To camouflage oneself in the jungles of suburban America, one should be clothed in Dunkin' Donuts and Taco Bell packaging. A soldier wears green camo in Vietnam to blend in. A policeman wears green camo in Ferguson to stand out - to let you guys know: We're here, we're severe, get used to it.

This is not a small thing. The point about "the thin blue line" is that it's blue for a reason. As I wrote a couple of months ago:

"The police" is a phenomenon of the modern world. It would be wholly alien, for example, to America's Founders. In the sense we use the term today, it dates back no further than Sir Robert Peel's founding of the Metropolitan Police in 1829. Because Londoners associated the concept with French-style political policing and state control, they were very resistant to the idea of a domestic soldiery keeping them in line. So Peel dressed his policemen in blue instead of infantry red, and instead of guns they had wooden truncheons.

So, when the police are dressed like combat troops, it's not a fashion faux pas, it's a fundamental misunderstanding of who they are. Forget the armored vehicles with the gun turrets, forget the faceless, helmeted, anonymous Robocops, and just listen to how these "policemen" talk. Look at the video as they're arresting the New York Times and Huffington Post reporters. Watch the St Louis County deputy ordering everyone to leave, and then adding: "This is not up for discussion."

Really? You're a constable. You may be carrying on like the military commander of an occupying army faced with a rabble of revolting natives, but in the end you're a constable. And the fact that you and your colleagues in that McDonald's are comfortable speaking to your fellow citizens like this is part of the problem. The most important of the "http://www.civitas.org.uk/pubs/policeNine.php" (formulated by the first two commissioners of the Metropolitan Police in 1829 and thereafter issued to every officer joining the force) is a very simple one: The police are the public and the public are the police. Not in Ferguson. Long before the teargassing begins and the bullets start flying, the way these guys talk is the first indication of how the remorseless militarization has corroded the soul of American policing.

Which brings us back to the death of Michael Brown. Let's assume for the sake of argument that everything the police say about this incident is correct. In that case, whether or not the fatal shooting of Mr Brown is a crime, it's certainly a mistake. When an unarmed shoplifter* in T-shirt and shorts with a five-buck cigar box in one hand has to be shot dead, you're doing it wrong.

American police have grown too comfortable with the routine use of lethal force. To reprise a few statistics I cited three months ago:

So the biggest government in the free world chooses not to keep statistics on how many people get shot by law enforcement. So be it. It does keep figures on "justifiable homicide", which it defines as "the killing of a felon by a law enforcement official in the line of duty". When is a police homicide not "justifiable"? Ah, well. At any rate, for 2012, the corpse count was 410.

By comparison, for the years 2012 and 2013 in England and Wales:

'No fatal police shootings.'

In the Netherlands:

'The average for the last 35 years is three dead and 15 injured...'

In Germany, a nation of 80 million people, police in 2011 fatally shot six persons. In Denmark, police shot 11 people in 11 years, and this was felt to be so disturbing that the National Police Commissioner held an inquiry into why his cops had gotten so trigger-happy. In Australia, 41 people were shot by police in eight years, and the then Justice Minister Amanda Vanstone (whose friend thinks I'm "eminently shaggable", but I digress) thought that that was too high. In Iceland, police have fatally shot just one suspect. That's one guy in the entire history of the country. He was killed by police last December.

So comparisons between the kill rates from American police and those of other developed nations aren't worth bothering with. Indeed, the "justifiable homicides" of US cops are more like the total murder count for other advanced societies:

In Oz, the total number of murders per year is about 270, so a nation of 23 million would have to increase by 50 per cent to commit as many homicides as American law enforcement. In Canada, whose urban police departments have absorbed certain American practices, a dozen or so people get shot dead by cops each year, which is again somewhat short of the US rate. Indeed, that 2012 "justifiable homicide" figure of 410 compares to a total Canadian homicide count for 2011 of 598. In other words, in America 120,000 or so full-time law enforcement officers rack up the same number of homicides as about 24 million Canadians.

That strikes me as on the high side.

In Ferguson, both parties agree that the first shot was fired from inside the car. The rest were fired by the officer when he'd got out of the car, with Chief Jackson conceding there could have been ten bullets fired. For purposes of comparison:

In 2011 the German police fired 85 bullets. That's all of them. The entire police force. The whole country. Eighty-five bullets in one year. That's seven bullets per month. One bullet for every million German citizens.
So the Ferguson PD used as many bullets on Michael Brown as the Polizei used on ten million Germans. But, by American standards, that's relatively restrained. The same year as those German figures - 2011 - the Miami PD blew through the Polizei's annual bullet allowance on just one traffic incident:

Police killed Raymond Herisse, 22, of Boynton Beach in a barrage of gunfire after they said he refused an order to pull over while speeding down a crowded Collins Avenue in his Hyundai...

Twelve officers – from Miami Beach and Hialeah – unleashed more than 100 rounds at Herisse, police said. The hail of bullets also struck and wounded three bystanders.
By comparison, those 85 German bullets per annum were aimed somewhat more precisely:

85 Patronen verfeuerten Polizeibeamte in Deutschland im Jahr 2011 bundesweit auf der Jagd nach Verbrechern, 49 davon waren Warnschüsse. 36-mal gaben die Polizisten gezielte Schüsse ab. Dabei wurden 15 Personen verletzt und sechs getötet, wie aus einer Statistik der Deutschen Hochschule der Polizei im westfälischen Münster hervorgeht.
That's to say, of those 85 bullets, 49 were warning shots. America no longer does "the warning shot". But whatever happened to "the shot"? With the 36 non-warning bullets fired by German police that year, they killed six people and wounded fifteen. That's a bullet-and-three-quarters per target. Whether shooting to kill or to disable, they're trying to do it with a single shot. American policing takes a third of Germany's annual bullet allowance just to off a dog:

In July, three officers fired 26 shots at a pit bull that had bitten a chunk out of an officer's leg in a Bronx apartment building. And there have been other episodes: in 1995, in the Bronx, officers fired 125 bullets during a bodega robbery, with one officer firing 45 rounds.

Just what happened on Saturday is still being investigated. Police experts, however, suggested in interviews yesterday that contagious shooting played a role in a fatal police shooting in Queens Saturday morning. According to the police account, five officers fired 50 shots at a bridegroom who, leaving his bachelor party at a strip club, twice drove his car into a minivan carrying plainclothes police officers investigating the club.

The bridegroom, Sean Bell, who was to be married hours later, was killed, and two of his friends were wounded, one critically.
Three months ago I asked this question:

Are American civilians so different from Europeans or Aussies or Kiwis or Canadians that they have to be policed as if they're cornered rebels in an ongoing civil war?
A startling number of American readers wrote to say, with remarkable insouciance, that the US could not afford the luxury of First World policing. Large tracts of America had too many illegal immigrants, drug gangs, racial grievances, etc. Maybe. But the problem is that, increasingly, this is the only style of law enforcement America's police culture teaches - not only for the teeming favelas, but for the leafy suburbs and the rural backwaters and the college-town keg party, too.

Which is to say that one day, unless something changes, we will all be policed like Ferguson.


*NOTE: Several readers have queried my use of the term "shoplifter", insisting that this was a "strongarm robbery", the phrase du jour. It's not clear whether, legally speaking, this was any kind of robbery, in the sense of a prosecutable crime: The store owner did not report any theft and did not volunteer the video as evidence. Instead, the Ferguson PD went to a judge to get a court order to make the store owner cough it up on the grounds that it might contain something useful to them.

And then the chief says he had no choice but to release it because he was getting Freedom of Information requests for it. Which makes even less sense...
 
Last edited:
With this statement Jimmy you have fell victim to the media's and government's agenda. Fear and propaganda and constant race baiting gets views and makes money. Two days after this shooting a white male in Utah , Taylor age 22, was shot and killed by a non white officer and police video clearly shows it was totally unwarranted. If they can keep ninety percent of the country focused on this stupid shit most won't notice we are slowly inching forward to WW3.Or that the gross deficit we have now reached will have your grandchildren in debt for their whole lives.

Do not take the bait and realize that hate is taught and with the systematic race baiting that tensions are at an all time high. Police have become an extension of the military and they are being trained to treat US citizens as terrorists. Low and behold every local police agency across the entire country has been outfitted with equipment and weapons more fit for a warzone than local communities.

Sad fact that most cops employed in this country are the dredges of society and wish nothing more then to have power over people.



I try not to watch news and shit since its racially and politically biased but for fuck sakes could we please just napalm those fucking animals tearing up their own community over that dumb criminal kid getting shot?

18yr old 'boy' was like 6-4 280 and from what i decipher, tough shit he got himself shot.

I'm terribly sick of the reverse racism fucking card! It makes me feel like being racist. Someone please shoot that hate mongering ass clown Al Sharpton!

Go fist yourself Ferguson! Bunch of goddamn animals.
 
Your absolutely correct in the fact the media got me to do exactly what they intended, got me angry, and had me sharing and discussing the story across social media! I know its not good but it is inherently difficult for me not to feel anguish over bullshit like this and I'm more upset that they dont give legitimate news and flip side stories to things. Oh well what can we do? Not too much with such a corrupt money loving system...
 
I think we are not looking at the big picture, rather only at the distractions they want us to see. People like to jump on bandwagons when they go by. While we are caught up in a controversy dividing race and class, they are working it tto pass more laws and take away more freedom.

Its kinda like Obama. Everyone is so caught up on one side or the other, they can't see what is really going on. Do you really believe there are two distinct parties with clear lines of division and separate agendas? Is it not possible that Obama is pretty carefully orchestrated to pave the way for what is coming next? Honestly will a republican elected into office undo
everything he did wrong? Repeal the unaffordable healthcare act? Have we forgotten George Bush was works king on healthcare bill? That Bush paved the way for everything Obama is now doing?

How do move a bandwagon where you want it? Use two bandwagons(ie divide and conquer). Use terrorism(without terrorizing) and focus attention on those things which will enable you to garner support for more control. Show the need for more laws. Use every tool available to push the agendas. God works pretty good in religious circles. Nothing beats children. You can accomplish anything if you can save just one child.

In the end its all just horseshit. Just remember, the bandwagon is most always behind the horse. Jump on the bandwagon and guess what your going to get drug through?
 
Ah yes time for us like minded whites to stick together and defend our selves and our territory thats all I have to say.
 
SOME BULLSHIT!!!!
SMH, WOW....
$225,000 in Crowdfunding Raised to Support Darren Wilson

COLLAPSE STORY
A crowdfunding site created this week to support Ferguson, Missouri, police officer Darren Wilson and his family continues to rake in donations, but not without backlash against comments made by some of the campaign's donors.

http://www.gofundme.com/SupportOfficerWilson, the campaign had raised over $225,000 as of midday Friday in support of Wilson, who shot and killed unarmed 18-year-old Michael Brown on Aug. 9. More than 5,600 people have pledged toward a goal of $250,000. Many donors added remarks while making their donations, some of which were incendiary. GoFundMe responded early Friday on Twitter saying the "comments posted in violation of GoFundMe's terms have been removed."

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/31066137/media-kit/
According to the page, it was "created to support Officer Darren Wilson of the Ferguson Police Department. We stand behind Officer Darren Wilson and his family during this trying time in their lives. All proceeds will be sent directly to Darren Wilson and his family for any financial needs they may have including legal fees."

http://www.gofundme.com/justiceformikebrown that was set up for the family of Michael Brown, which as of Friday afternoon had raised $160,000 over eight days.

NEWS FLASH
#UNARMED TEEN SHOT DEAD AGAIN!
MILITARIZED POLICE CUNT GETS RICH!

The Pentagon Is Giving Grenade Launchers to Campus Police
By Hannah K. Gold | Sep 5 2014

http://www.tumblr.com/share
43 points onreddit
640px-Ohio-University-Police-Cruisers.jpg


Campus police at Ohio University. Photo viaWikimedia

In 1968, students at Columbia University staged a mass uprising, joining other college campuses in protesting not just the war in Vietnam, but their school’s collaboration with the Institute for Defense Analysis, a Defense Department affiliate that researches weapons technologies. Today, weapons produced by that institute are used by the US military throughout the world—and by campus police forces across the country. The war has come home.

The Pentagon’s 1033 program, which allows the Defense Department to unload its excess military equipment onto local police forces, has quietly overflowed onto college campuses. According to documents obtained by the website Muckrock, more than 100 campus police forces have received military materials from the Pentagon. Schools that participate in the program range from liberal arts to community colleges to the entire University of Texas system. Emory, Rice, Purdue, and the University of California, Berkeley, are all on the list.

In 1990, Congress enacted the National Defense Authorization Act, including the magnanimous section 1208, which since 1996 has been known as program 1033. Over the last 17 years, this trickle-down gift economy hasdistributed more than $4.3 billion worth of equipment, according to program administrators. As Ferguson police rolled up to peaceful protesters in military-grade tanks, firing tear gas and rubber bullets, President Obama ordered a review of the program, which reached new highs in regifting under his tenure.

It’s clear why a review of the program is in order, because it isn’t clear at all what sort of equipment these colleges are receiving. David Perry, the president of the International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators, told Politico that 1033 mostly funnels “small items” to college police forces for daily use. These could be anything from office supplies or uniforms or car parts, but it’s probably not all that tame. Campus Safety magazine recommends that universities take part in the 1033 program to cover a range of needs from storage units to grenade launchers. That is, after all, what the program was designed to achieve.

But program 1033 doesn’t even come close to explaining all the ways in which campus police have been militarized over the past two decades. Colleges can also apply for Homeland Security grants, the same ones made available to every municipal police department in the country after 9/11. In 2012, UC Berkeley tried to use the program to purchase an eight-ton armored truck. After a backlash, university officials ultimately decided the truck was “not the best choice for a university setting.” The following year, Ohio State University acquired amine-resistant ambush protected (MRAP) vehicle. So far, it has yet to be targeted.

Other college policies are even more difficult to quantify, though they pose immense obstacles to the cultures of free action and thought that academic institutions are supposed to cultivate. One such policy is Memorandum of Understanding, in which local law enforcement enters into an official partnership with campus “peace officers.” Sometimes memoranda of understanding can have positive impacts on students, as when they are established between universities and rape crisis centers to ensure that anyone seeking help receives proper care. In this sort of arrangement, universities work with centers and both institutions train one another, so that resources and knowledge are shared. This is what happens with local and campus police arrangements: The departments draft vague language to work in concert on operations both on and off campus, but the actual extent of this partnership is not well documented, with the line between campus police forces and those controlled by local government fuzzy at best.

Several campus police forces have also been vigorously trained in paramilitary tactics since 2007. In a country where SWAT teams raid private residencies more than 100 times a day, mostly in neighborhoods where people of color live, the decision to train campus officers in this overindulged art is on the part of institutions of higher education, even before the training is ever put to use.

In the 1960s, campuses went into lockdown because students were occupying buildings; now, they often go into lockdown campus police are itching to stretch their military muscles. Horrible crimes have been committed with guns at colleges, but using the Virginia Tech massacre and other shootings to justify turning universities into police states is disingenuous considering that campuses are still among the safest places in the country—and these tactics clearly aren’t making them any safer. But amped up fears have made it easy for the Pentagon and local law enforcement to align with campus police while being met with little pushback.

Just last month, campus police at Cal State San Marcos put the university on lockdown based on intelligence that a man was walking around campus with a gun. The suspect, they later learned, was armed only with an umbrella. In December 2013, American University in Washington, DC shut down its academic operations to search for a reported gunman who turned out to be an off-duty police officer. On Wednesday, Denison University and all other schools in the district of Granville, Ohio, werehttp://www.nbc4i.com/story/26439571/denison-university-granville-schools-on-lockdown-after-threat after police received a phony threat of an impending shooting.

Concurrent with increasing lockdown drills and stockpiling of weapons is the stifling of student dissent. In 2009, during the G-20 Summit, student protestors at the University of Pittsburgh were demonstrating peacefully on their campus when cops demanded they disperse, then quickly proceeded to arrest several of them. Police sprayed pepper gas at passersby and onto the balconies of residences where students were watching the scene below.

There was also the infamous mass pepper spraying of Occupy demonstrators at UC Davis in 2011. Police used CS gas, pepper pellets, and beanbag rounds on UC student protesters throughout 2012. When students and workers at UC Riverside publicly demanded the scaling back of university privatization in a number of sectors, they were met with batons and paintball pellets.

The list of infringements upon student dissent, student space, and student bodies, is too long to enumerate here. Yet, importantly, it is also impossible to quantify, because incidents are never added up and detailed funding records never corralled into a comprehensible database. In the absence of serious oversight and accounting, narratives are stitched together, stories swapped, and a picture of violent state surveillance and control emerges. The picture squares with what we see in cities, towns, and communities across America.

And it squares with much of what’s taken place in response to the killing of Michael Brown by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson in important ways, including the swiftness and brutality with which police met protestors in Ferguson and the importance of young people and youth culture in conveying images of that brutality to the world. Most of the protesters in Ferguson and those marching in solidarity across the country are young, and young people are more likely to support http://www.pewresearch.org/files/2014/08/FT_blacks-views-police-searches.pngthan their aged peers.

Perhaps this has something to do with the channels through which the story unfolding in Ferguson was most urgently told: grainy feeds on guerrilla news sites, social media, and, yes, websites geared toward millennials like VICE. It probably also has to do with the fact that so many young people mistrust the government, no matter who’s in charge. But perhaps most important, it’s young people, mostly young people of color, who are the targets of policies that feed the warrior cop ethos: increased surveillance, stop-and-frisk, and arrest quotas fueled by government grants. Joel Andersonwrote for Buzzfeed that most of the protestors in Ferguson “are young black men and some women from Ferguson and the surrounding inner suburbs of St. Louis who see themselves in Brown—not just because he was 18 and black, but also because they have their own tales of being harassed by police.”

A few weeks ago, activist and journalist Mariame Kaba asked on Twitter: “How can we build a movement to divest from police? Is there a way for us to do this? Can we go after local police budgets?”

One place to start is with those college campuses whose police forces receive 1033 and Homeland Security funding. The time is ripe for student journalists and activists to use the information furnished by Muckrock and to do their own digging to take on police divestment campaigns with the tenacity, political savvy, and exuberance that’s pushed universities nationwide to divest from fossil fuels, private prisons, and Israeli occupation. Young people in solidarity with the people of Ferguson and the families who have lost sons and daughters at the hands of militant police are poised to illuminate these connections between education, state surveillance, and state violence in a uniquely powerful way.
Sorry bout the lost post, kinda!
 
The people of ferguson and much more the civil right leaders such as Jesse Jackson disgust me and last night actions they pushed whether physically or simply as verbally only enhances your weaknesses. Way to go by promoting violence via judicial system slander by the way Jesse.

Nothing angers me more then putting civil service personnel at risk. Much more the firefighters and ems personel that are sworn to protect your neighborhoods. Not only endangering they're lives but further being capable to handicap families at home.
 
I live in the sticks and this shit boggles my mind.
It is a urban problem I think.
If this happens in or around my town people would think a zombie apocalypse was happening and start shooting the rioters.
If the cops show up in armored cars then we would have to break out the Barrett 50's
 
If anyone believes the cop was justified in killing him or mike brown was not a 18 year old thug they are kidding themselves.this 18 year told displayed actions of a criminal until he lost his life. Cop in this event never thought of mike brown as an human being after being ignored and disrespected. I wish I can say this is as black and white as it gets but it's not. It is the fear of a big Blackman and young cop that's holding the gun it's justified!!!! Not really it's the 100 years old fear that destroyed both lives. We may live right next to each other, but we don't live together as a community. If the officer had any empathy for the misguided black youth, his actions may have been different. Having said this, mike brown would still
Be alive today if he did not act like the scary thug he wanted to be that day. 18 years old we were all idiots.black community needs to stop lying to themselves about the youth. All the criminal activity that followed the protests shows you have no control over the youth. They are burning down your own Neighborhood. I am familiar with ferguson and Florissant neighborhoods. These were the only open minded communities back in the day for black families to be able to buy homes. But integration never happened. Resentment on both sides towards the other fuels the fear that caused a national tragedy. I pray for both officer Wilson and mike brown. THEY ARE THE PRODUCT OF THIS SOCIETY. We should all have an open mind for the others and their believes.
Pray for calm soon. All involved are HUMAN BEINGS misguided or not !!!!!!!!
 
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

"It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority."

"When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty"

"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent."

"But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever."

"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."

"...whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
 
Back
Top