Marijuana: did you know

I wouldn't wipe my ass with any of the drivel that "publication" puts out.

If anyone listened to the financial predictions (conspiracy theories) they spew out, they'd be bankrupt.

I understand that but my point was even Flenser conceded it with his post and he's as anti-Clinton as they get
 
I understand that but my point was even Flenser conceded it

Lol, I understand. Wasn't trying to rag on you. I just hate that site. Worthless.

They were supposed to be an up and coming financial site when they forecasted a "prediction" about a financial issue. I forget what it was now... Anyways, they turned out to be right. Problem was, they predicted 90% of future financial issues completely wrong. Basically, even a blind squirrel gets a nut from time to time. They are the national enquirer of finance sites... Political now too it appears.

he's as anti-Clinton as they get

Hmm. Never got that impression from him...? ;)
 
I heard Flenser wanted Hillary to be the godmother of his next child....but shhhhhhhhhh, it's supposed to be a secret :)
 
Lol, I understand. Wasn't trying to rag on you. I just hate that site. Worthless.

They were supposed to be an up and coming financial site when they forecasted a "prediction" about a financial issue. I forget what it was now... Anyways, they turned out to be right. Problem was, they predicted 90% of future financial issues completely wrong. Basically, even a blind squirrel gets a nut from time to time. They are the national enquirer of finance sites... Political now too it appears.



Hmm. Never got that impression from him...? ;)

I mentioned in the past they are a convenient repository of other people's research, and they cut and paste much easier than most sites. Anyway, they provide facts to back up any predictions made. I'm interested in the facts more than the predictions. It's one of the few sites that doesn't intentionally misrepresent the data, even if they are predisposed to a particular viewpoint. Me thinks it's that viewpoint you dislike.
 
I mentioned in the past they are a convenient repository of other people's research, and they cut and paste much easier than most sites. Anyway, they provide facts to back up any predictions made. I'm interested in the facts more than the predictions. It's one of the few sites that doesn't intentionally misrepresent the data, even if they are predisposed to a particular viewpoint. Me thinks it's that viewpoint you dislike.

Is it true you've asked Hillary to be the godmother of your next child????? Meso NEEDS to know.

:p
 
Me thinks it's that viewpoint you dislike.

Not necessarily. I find their viewpoints humorous for the most part. The "facts" they cite have never been actual facts either that I've read, I haven't read that many of their articles though admittedly. I wrote them off primarily because of there inane financial articles.

The Tyler's writing from behind a pseudonym in obvious support of Donald Trump are hard to take seriously... They are exiled hedge fund managing inside traders and political science douchebags.
 
Back
Top