Making Fina

Thanks for the replies guys. So your saying it can be done without the BB? Just run no more than 1.3ml of BA per cart, right?
 
Yes, it can be done without BB, and without BA, for that matter. But if not using BA then it is convenient to have a sonicator to aid with the dissolution.

What is the objection to the BB, by the way?

The difficulty with using only 1.33 mL of BA and no BB is that the convenience of having all the TA dissolve into solvent first may be lost. (I can't say that positively as I don't do it that way.) 1.33 mL of BA would be very little to dissolve 2.0 g of trenbolone acetate and might be insufficient.

Having another 5.33 mL of BB, giving a final concentration of 20% BB, provides more solvent for the TA to initially dissolve in.
 
There's no objection to running the BB just tryin to be cheap I guess?!?!:o No, the guy I talked to, runs the buisness that sold me the Daze'd kit for Synovex and he just said to run the 3ml of BA to make the tren. I was gonna get the BB along with the BA from him but he said the BB wasn't necessary? I figured he would have a good idea as to what he was talking bout.
 
Well, if running 75 mg/mL, for each 2.0 g of TA there will be 26.67 mL of final solution. 3 mL of BA works out to 11.2%.

Most consider that very excessive.

It would be even worse if planning to run 100 mg/mL: it would then come to 15%.

It's just needless and probably painful. For most it is definitely painful; the "probably" refers to a possibility that some individuals might differ in tolerance. I would even wonder if the 15% value might be tissue-damaging to some probably-slight extent, but don't know for a fact if it is. Certainly no pharmaceutical injectable preparation uses such a high BA content.
 
Back
Top