I would like to know what those of you who support trump will do when he loses the election?

This has been retweeted by Lin Wood, President Trump, and others. Just trolling the opposition? If it is true, the implications are monumental, and a whole lot of players are not gonna walk away....

 
This has been retweeted by Lin Wood, President Trump, and others. Just trolling the opposition? If it is true, the implications are monumental, and a whole lot of players are not gonna walk away....

Lol what a bunch of tripe that article is. Come on now who believes all that crap? Lets get real!
 
This has been retweeted by Lin Wood, President Trump, and others. Just trolling the opposition? If it is true, the implications are monumental, and a whole lot of players are not gonna walk away....

Oh gawd lol. I dont even know...
 
284351035-edgar-hoover-fbi-director.jpg

The Communist threat from without must not blind us to the Communist threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our republic.”​

~ J. Edgar Hoover
former FBI director

 
This has been retweeted by Lin Wood, President Trump, and others. Just trolling the opposition? If it is true, the implications are monumental, and a whole lot of players are not gonna walk away....

It's illegal for the DOD to spy on its own citizens. Also, the nature of the fraud accusations isn't something easily detected through "cyber warfare". More to the point, any of the FBI, CIA, NSA or DOD (and numerous others) could easily have disassembled the software on a Dominion machine to show it was written specifically to facilitate fraud - or they could have just read the user's manual which says just that.
 
Sydney Powell's civil suits against https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf and https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf.
 
It's illegal for the DOD to spy on its own citizens. Also, the nature of the fraud accusations isn't something easily detected through "cyber warfare". More to the point, any of the FBI, CIA, NSA or DOD (and numerous others) could easily have disassembled the software on a Dominion machine to show it was written specifically to facilitate fraud - or they could have just read the user's manual which says just that.
The illegality of spying on its own citizens can be said of the CIA too. Did that ever stop them? Are you saying that people in positions of power never do anything illegal?

Did you even read the article? Of course what you said about Dominion is true. That's half the focus of the article.

More to the point (to use your phrase) is that Lin Wood, Sidney Powell, POTUS and others tweeted about this article, so the question is why, and what importance might be inferred from them doing so. It strikes me as as a bit presumptive to just dismiss it as false. Much of what is said in it about corruption is most definitely true.
 
This has been retweeted by Lin Wood, President Trump, and others. Just trolling the opposition? If it is true, the implications are monumental, and a whole lot of players are not gonna walk away....

That article is... something. I don't even know what to call it.

The word "unhinged" comes close.
 
The illegality of spying on its own citizens can be said of the CIA too. Did that ever stop them? Are you saying that people in positions of power never do anything illegal?

Did you even read the article? Of course what you said about Dominion is true. That's half the focus of the article.

More to the point (to use your phrase) is that Lin Wood, Sidney Powell, POTUS and others tweeted about this article, so the question is why, and what importance might be inferred from them doing so. It strikes me as as a bit presumptive to just dismiss it as false. Much of what is said in it about corruption is most definitely true.
I did read the article. My approach is to always dismiss new info without a second source to confirm it, and to look for reasons it might be untrue. I'm not saying it's not true. I'm saying it's very unlikely as well as unnecessary given the existing evidence. And it's a rare event for any spook agency to expose their secret programs to the public.

In the case of the CIA, yes, they broke the law. But no, they didn't tweet about it.

The tweets from Lin Wood, et. al. are not confirmation IMO. Trump in particular sometimes retweets info I know is false. I don't know their strategy, and from what I've read in the last 4+ years, no one else does either.
 
I love it when people are skeptical about the main stream media (as they should be) but then they take every article and claim that they read at Joe's Shifty News Page as gospel.

It's comedic gold. Anything that agrees with my beliefs is truth, anything that challenges my beliefs is fake news.
 
I love it when people are skeptical about the main stream media (as they should be) but then they take every article and claim that they read at Joe's Shifty News Page as gospel.

It's comedic gold. Anything that agrees with my beliefs is truth, anything that challenges my beliefs is fake news.
I have found it very difficult to find reliable unbiased news sources for years. If you know of any, please share. I'm not looking for sources that cater to my personal beliefs, I only want facts so I can make my own informed decisions.
 
I have found it very difficult to find reliable unbiased news sources for years. If you know of any, please share. I'm not looking for sources that cater to my personal beliefs, I only want facts so I can make my own informed decisions.
I don't know of any, unfortunately. I tend to just look up information at multiple outlets with different bents and apply reason and logic to the information that's presented.

That's about as good as it gets, sadly. News these days is about "info-tainment," generating clicks and pushing agendas rather than informing the public.
 
I have found it very difficult to find reliable unbiased news sources for years. If you know of any, please share. I'm not looking for sources that cater to my personal beliefs, I only want facts so I can make my own informed decisions.
Good luck. I don't think you will find it.
Looking back to 1800, a time with no radio or television, Thomas Jefferson said that a person would be closer to the truth if he never read the newspapers.
 
I have found it very difficult to find reliable unbiased news sources for years. If you know of any, please share. I'm not looking for sources that cater to my personal beliefs, I only want facts so I can make my own informed decisions.
There are some Brett Baher is a straight shooter. Lester Holt is a favorite as well. Bill O Reilly was great and still hosts a pretty fair broadcast. Least he isnt with Fox any more. Redeye Radios Eric Harley and Gary McNamara has been a long time favorite. All 5 of these examples are capable of setting aside preferences to have an honest broadcast. OReilly has always suprised me in his brutal honesty.

All of CNN is a joke and everyone in it. I want to like Brian Williams of msnbc but some thing is a lil off about his delivery. I dont trust him.

Oh i know you can get fair news from Hannity and Rush:rolleyes: Watching Hannity always pisses me off. Really dislike that dude
 
The days of unbiased reporting are mostly gone. Hannity is the definition of a shill,he's awful. I thought shep wasn't bad when he was at fox.
To be fair i think everyone is aware shows like Hannity cater to the right and are not and never were intended to be news casts. Same with Rush and Tucker. Brett Baher by contrast is a journalist and a news caster and a damn good one.

The difference is CNN for example they parade around as news but are in actuality all just shows with zero journalism involved. Propoganda. Just like Hannity. But its understood Hannity exists for a sole purpose and should never be taken as news. Cooper, Cuomo, Zakaria, Lemon, Maddow and too many too list are in the same boat as Hannity just opposite spectrums. Equally as repulsive
 
To be fair i think everyone is aware shows like Hannity cater to the right and are not and never were intended to be news casts. Same with Rush and Tucker. Brett Baher by contrast is a journalist and a news caster and a damn good one.

The difference is CNN for example they parade around as news but are in actuality all just shows with zero journalism involved. Propoganda. Just like Hannity. But its understood Hannity exists for a sole purpose and should never be taken as news. Cooper, Cuomo, Zakaria, Lemon, Maddow and too many too list are in the same boat as Hannity just opposite spectrums. Equally as repulsive

Absolutely agree. I will say the best part of Hannity shows are when he tells how deadly his martial arts training is and he even released a video. He had Dana white on once that I remember and I'm not sure how Dana kept a straight face. A bit off topic but it struck me funny.
 
Back
Top